预测无功能肾上腺偶发瘤患者的恶性程度,为治疗指明方向

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Surgical Oncology-Oxford Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102122
Jongwon Jung , Byung-Chang Kim , Douk Kwon , Won Woong Kim , Yu-mi Lee , Kye Jin Park , Seung Hun Lee , Ki-Wook Chung , Tae-Yon Sung
{"title":"预测无功能肾上腺偶发瘤患者的恶性程度,为治疗指明方向","authors":"Jongwon Jung ,&nbsp;Byung-Chang Kim ,&nbsp;Douk Kwon ,&nbsp;Won Woong Kim ,&nbsp;Yu-mi Lee ,&nbsp;Kye Jin Park ,&nbsp;Seung Hun Lee ,&nbsp;Ki-Wook Chung ,&nbsp;Tae-Yon Sung","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Adrenal incidentalomas (AI) are predominantly nonfunctional and benign, and their detection and differential diagnosis are aided by computed tomography (CT). A nonfunctioning adrenal incidentaloma (NFAI) usually requires regular follow-up; however, adrenalectomy may be necessary in certain patients. This study aimed to evaluate prognostic predictors to guide the treatment approach for AIs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective, single-center study involved patients diagnosed with NFAI from January 2000 to December 2020. Patients were divided into surgery and observation groups. A subgroup analysis compared malignant and benign adenoma within the surgery group.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 307 patients were included, with 127 in the surgery group and 180 in the observation group. The surgery group displayed distinct morphological and malignant potential features in CT scans more frequently than the observational group did. The malignant subgroup exhibited more irregular borders on CT, and a higher number of patients with absolute washout under 60 % and relative washout under 40 % compared with the benign adenoma subgroup. Interestingly, within the surgery group, the mean tumor size was &lt;4 cm for the both malignant and benign adenoma subgroups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Characterizing NFAI is important for appropriate treatment, as not all AIs have a favorable prognosis. CT findings associated with malignant potential, such as Hounsfield unit and washout values, were useful in determining the need for surgical treatment. However, the conventional criterion of a 4-cm size threshold for surgery was not a reliable malignancy predictor. Surgical resection should be considered for specific patient groups to ensure proper treatment over mere observation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 102122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of malignancy for treatment direction in patients with nonfunctioning adrenal incidentaloma\",\"authors\":\"Jongwon Jung ,&nbsp;Byung-Chang Kim ,&nbsp;Douk Kwon ,&nbsp;Won Woong Kim ,&nbsp;Yu-mi Lee ,&nbsp;Kye Jin Park ,&nbsp;Seung Hun Lee ,&nbsp;Ki-Wook Chung ,&nbsp;Tae-Yon Sung\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Adrenal incidentalomas (AI) are predominantly nonfunctional and benign, and their detection and differential diagnosis are aided by computed tomography (CT). A nonfunctioning adrenal incidentaloma (NFAI) usually requires regular follow-up; however, adrenalectomy may be necessary in certain patients. This study aimed to evaluate prognostic predictors to guide the treatment approach for AIs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective, single-center study involved patients diagnosed with NFAI from January 2000 to December 2020. Patients were divided into surgery and observation groups. A subgroup analysis compared malignant and benign adenoma within the surgery group.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 307 patients were included, with 127 in the surgery group and 180 in the observation group. The surgery group displayed distinct morphological and malignant potential features in CT scans more frequently than the observational group did. The malignant subgroup exhibited more irregular borders on CT, and a higher number of patients with absolute washout under 60 % and relative washout under 40 % compared with the benign adenoma subgroup. Interestingly, within the surgery group, the mean tumor size was &lt;4 cm for the both malignant and benign adenoma subgroups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Characterizing NFAI is important for appropriate treatment, as not all AIs have a favorable prognosis. CT findings associated with malignant potential, such as Hounsfield unit and washout values, were useful in determining the need for surgical treatment. However, the conventional criterion of a 4-cm size threshold for surgery was not a reliable malignancy predictor. Surgical resection should be considered for specific patient groups to ensure proper treatment over mere observation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Oncology-Oxford\",\"volume\":\"56 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Oncology-Oxford\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960740424000902\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960740424000902","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景肾上腺偶发瘤(AI)主要是无功能的良性肿瘤,计算机断层扫描(CT)有助于其检测和鉴别诊断。无功能性肾上腺偶发瘤(NFAI)通常需要定期随访,但某些患者可能需要进行肾上腺切除术。本研究旨在评估预后预测因素,为肾上腺偶发瘤的治疗方法提供指导。方法这项回顾性单中心研究涉及 2000 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间确诊的 NFAI 患者。患者被分为手术组和观察组。结果 共纳入 307 例患者,其中手术组 127 例,观察组 180 例。与观察组相比,手术组在 CT 扫描中更多地显示出明显的形态学特征和恶性潜在特征。与良性腺瘤亚组相比,恶性亚组在 CT 上显示出更多不规则的边界,绝对冲洗度低于 60% 和相对冲洗度低于 40% 的患者人数也更多。有趣的是,在手术组中,恶性腺瘤亚组和良性腺瘤亚组的平均肿瘤大小均为 4 厘米。与恶性潜能相关的 CT 结果,如 Hounsfield 单位和冲洗值,有助于确定是否需要手术治疗。然而,4 厘米大小的手术阈值这一传统标准并不是可靠的恶性肿瘤预测指标。对于特定的患者群体,应考虑进行手术切除,以确保治疗的正确性,而不是单纯的观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictors of malignancy for treatment direction in patients with nonfunctioning adrenal incidentaloma

Background

Adrenal incidentalomas (AI) are predominantly nonfunctional and benign, and their detection and differential diagnosis are aided by computed tomography (CT). A nonfunctioning adrenal incidentaloma (NFAI) usually requires regular follow-up; however, adrenalectomy may be necessary in certain patients. This study aimed to evaluate prognostic predictors to guide the treatment approach for AIs.

Methods

This retrospective, single-center study involved patients diagnosed with NFAI from January 2000 to December 2020. Patients were divided into surgery and observation groups. A subgroup analysis compared malignant and benign adenoma within the surgery group.

Results

A total of 307 patients were included, with 127 in the surgery group and 180 in the observation group. The surgery group displayed distinct morphological and malignant potential features in CT scans more frequently than the observational group did. The malignant subgroup exhibited more irregular borders on CT, and a higher number of patients with absolute washout under 60 % and relative washout under 40 % compared with the benign adenoma subgroup. Interestingly, within the surgery group, the mean tumor size was <4 cm for the both malignant and benign adenoma subgroups.

Conclusions

Characterizing NFAI is important for appropriate treatment, as not all AIs have a favorable prognosis. CT findings associated with malignant potential, such as Hounsfield unit and washout values, were useful in determining the need for surgical treatment. However, the conventional criterion of a 4-cm size threshold for surgery was not a reliable malignancy predictor. Surgical resection should be considered for specific patient groups to ensure proper treatment over mere observation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical Oncology-Oxford
Surgical Oncology-Oxford 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
169
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Surgical Oncology is a peer reviewed journal publishing review articles that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in surgical oncology and related fields of interest. Articles represent a spectrum of current technology in oncology research as well as those concerning clinical trials, surgical technique, methods of investigation and patient evaluation. Surgical Oncology publishes comprehensive Reviews that examine individual topics in considerable detail, in addition to editorials and commentaries which focus on selected papers. The journal also publishes special issues which explore topics of interest to surgical oncologists in great detail - outlining recent advancements and providing readers with the most up to date information.
期刊最新文献
Radioembolization prior to liver resection may increase the risk of severe biliary complications: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study performed in France. Commentary: Wide-field isthmusectomy for localized isthmic thyroid tumors. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases: A pragmatic comparison of oncological outcomes in synchronous versus metachronous disease. Impact of structured surveillance of patients with esophageal cancer following surgical resection with curative intent. Comparison between bipolar scissors, monopolar electrocautery, and hydrodissection in nipple-sparing mastectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1