认知行为疗法中的单案例方法:促进个性化心理治疗研究中的良好实践

Lucien Rochat , Rumen Manolov
{"title":"认知行为疗法中的单案例方法:促进个性化心理治疗研究中的良好实践","authors":"Lucien Rochat ,&nbsp;Rumen Manolov","doi":"10.1016/j.jbct.2024.100502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Psychotherapy continually evolves through innovative approaches, with single-case methodology gaining prominence for its detailed insights into individual psychological interventions. This article briefly explores the historical roots and empirical foundation of the single-case methodology and underlines the significance of single-case methodology in psychotherapy by stressing the limitations of group studies and advantages of single-case studies. It then exposes some of the most frequent designs with their pros and cons, presents a scale to assess methodological biases relevant for appraising the scientific literature on single-case studies and for planning research in the field, exposes guidelines to publish single-case research articles as well as briefly introduces relevant elements related to data analyses and statistics. The resurgence of single-case methodology in the 21st century, driven by advancements in statistical methods and influences from evidence-based medicine and education, underscores their growing importance. The flexibility of this methodology allows for adaptation to various research and clinical settings, accommodating complex and individualized treatment plans.</p><p>This article aims to guide clinicians and researchers in the field of cognitive and behavior therapy in conducting and publishing single-case studies with a rigorous methodological approach, highlighting the value of single-case methodology in advancing personalized, evidence-based psychotherapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","volume":"34 3","pages":"Article 100502"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589979124000209/pdfft?md5=bae72dd0605c1765a0e7bd9db265d450&pid=1-s2.0-S2589979124000209-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-case methodology in cognitive behavior therapy: Promoting good practice within personalized psychotherapy research\",\"authors\":\"Lucien Rochat ,&nbsp;Rumen Manolov\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbct.2024.100502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Psychotherapy continually evolves through innovative approaches, with single-case methodology gaining prominence for its detailed insights into individual psychological interventions. This article briefly explores the historical roots and empirical foundation of the single-case methodology and underlines the significance of single-case methodology in psychotherapy by stressing the limitations of group studies and advantages of single-case studies. It then exposes some of the most frequent designs with their pros and cons, presents a scale to assess methodological biases relevant for appraising the scientific literature on single-case studies and for planning research in the field, exposes guidelines to publish single-case research articles as well as briefly introduces relevant elements related to data analyses and statistics. The resurgence of single-case methodology in the 21st century, driven by advancements in statistical methods and influences from evidence-based medicine and education, underscores their growing importance. The flexibility of this methodology allows for adaptation to various research and clinical settings, accommodating complex and individualized treatment plans.</p><p>This article aims to guide clinicians and researchers in the field of cognitive and behavior therapy in conducting and publishing single-case studies with a rigorous methodological approach, highlighting the value of single-case methodology in advancing personalized, evidence-based psychotherapy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100502\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589979124000209/pdfft?md5=bae72dd0605c1765a0e7bd9db265d450&pid=1-s2.0-S2589979124000209-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589979124000209\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589979124000209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心理疗法通过创新方法不断发展,其中单案例方法学因其对个体心理干预的细致洞察力而备受瞩目。本文简要探讨了单病例方法的历史渊源和实证基础,通过强调团体研究的局限性和单病例研究的优势,强调了单病例方法在心理治疗中的重要意义。然后,它揭示了一些最常见的设计及其利弊,提出了一个评估方法偏差的量表,该量表与评估有关单病例研究的科学文献和规划该领域的研究相关,它还揭示了发表单病例研究文章的指南,并简要介绍了与数据分析和统计相关的内容。在统计方法进步的推动下,以及循证医学和教育的影响,单一病例研究方法在 21 世纪再次兴起,凸显了其日益增长的重要性。本文旨在指导认知与行为疗法领域的临床医生和研究人员以严谨的方法论开展并发表单病例研究,强调单病例方法论在推进个性化循证心理疗法方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Single-case methodology in cognitive behavior therapy: Promoting good practice within personalized psychotherapy research

Psychotherapy continually evolves through innovative approaches, with single-case methodology gaining prominence for its detailed insights into individual psychological interventions. This article briefly explores the historical roots and empirical foundation of the single-case methodology and underlines the significance of single-case methodology in psychotherapy by stressing the limitations of group studies and advantages of single-case studies. It then exposes some of the most frequent designs with their pros and cons, presents a scale to assess methodological biases relevant for appraising the scientific literature on single-case studies and for planning research in the field, exposes guidelines to publish single-case research articles as well as briefly introduces relevant elements related to data analyses and statistics. The resurgence of single-case methodology in the 21st century, driven by advancements in statistical methods and influences from evidence-based medicine and education, underscores their growing importance. The flexibility of this methodology allows for adaptation to various research and clinical settings, accommodating complex and individualized treatment plans.

This article aims to guide clinicians and researchers in the field of cognitive and behavior therapy in conducting and publishing single-case studies with a rigorous methodological approach, highlighting the value of single-case methodology in advancing personalized, evidence-based psychotherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
60 days
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of online mental health education on occupational burnout among medical staff Analyzing data in single-case experimental designs: Objectives and available software options The effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy in mental health problems of children and adolescents in child protection system: A meta-analysis Assessing user acceptance of a mental health app & its impact on depression and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder related knowledge: A mixed method experimental study Morphological changes and body representation: A study of the link between weight cycling and body schema disturbances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1