Jing Wang, Pujiao Song, Meng Zhang, Wei Liu, Xi Zeng, Nanshan Chen, Yuxia Li, Minghua Wang
{"title":"基于深度学习和 DWI 放射组学特征的预测模型,用于评估子宫内膜癌的微卫星不稳定性。","authors":"Jing Wang, Pujiao Song, Meng Zhang, Wei Liu, Xi Zeng, Nanshan Chen, Yuxia Li, Minghua Wang","doi":"10.1002/cam4.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>To explore the efficacy of a prediction model based on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) features extracted from deep learning (DL) and radiomics combined with clinical parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values to identify microsatellite instability (MSI) in endometrial cancer (EC).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study included a cohort of 116 patients with EC, who were subsequently divided into training (<i>n</i> = 81) and test (<i>n</i> = 35) sets. From DWI, conventional radiomics features and convolutional neural network-based DL features were extracted. Random forest (RF) and logistic regression were adopted as classifiers. DL features, radiomics features, clinical variables, ADC values, and their combinations were applied to establish DL, radiomics, clinical, ADC, and combined models, respectively. The predictive performance was evaluated through the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), total integrated discrimination index (IDI), net reclassification index (NRI), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The optimal predictive model, based on an RF classifier, comprised four DL features, three radiomics features, two clinical variables, and an ADC value. In the training and test sets, this model exhibited AUC values of 0.989 (95% CI: 0.935–1.000) and 0.885 (95% CI: 0.731–0.967), respectively, demonstrating different degrees of improvement compared with the clinical, DL, radiomics, and ADC models (AUC-training = 0.671, 0.873, 0.833, and 0.814, AUC-test = 0.685, 0.783, 0.708, and 0.713, respectively). The NRI and IDI analyses revealed that the combined model resulted in improved risk reclassification of the MSI status compared to the clinical, radiomics, DL, and ADC models. The calibration curves and DCA indicated good consistency and clinical utility of this model, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The predictive model based on DWI features extracted from DL and radiomics combined with clinical parameters and ADC values could effectively assess the MSI status in EC.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.70046","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A prediction model based on deep learning and radiomics features of DWI for the assessment of microsatellite instability in endometrial cancer\",\"authors\":\"Jing Wang, Pujiao Song, Meng Zhang, Wei Liu, Xi Zeng, Nanshan Chen, Yuxia Li, Minghua Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cam4.70046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>To explore the efficacy of a prediction model based on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) features extracted from deep learning (DL) and radiomics combined with clinical parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values to identify microsatellite instability (MSI) in endometrial cancer (EC).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study included a cohort of 116 patients with EC, who were subsequently divided into training (<i>n</i> = 81) and test (<i>n</i> = 35) sets. From DWI, conventional radiomics features and convolutional neural network-based DL features were extracted. Random forest (RF) and logistic regression were adopted as classifiers. DL features, radiomics features, clinical variables, ADC values, and their combinations were applied to establish DL, radiomics, clinical, ADC, and combined models, respectively. The predictive performance was evaluated through the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), total integrated discrimination index (IDI), net reclassification index (NRI), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The optimal predictive model, based on an RF classifier, comprised four DL features, three radiomics features, two clinical variables, and an ADC value. In the training and test sets, this model exhibited AUC values of 0.989 (95% CI: 0.935–1.000) and 0.885 (95% CI: 0.731–0.967), respectively, demonstrating different degrees of improvement compared with the clinical, DL, radiomics, and ADC models (AUC-training = 0.671, 0.873, 0.833, and 0.814, AUC-test = 0.685, 0.783, 0.708, and 0.713, respectively). The NRI and IDI analyses revealed that the combined model resulted in improved risk reclassification of the MSI status compared to the clinical, radiomics, DL, and ADC models. The calibration curves and DCA indicated good consistency and clinical utility of this model, respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The predictive model based on DWI features extracted from DL and radiomics combined with clinical parameters and ADC values could effectively assess the MSI status in EC.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.70046\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70046\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A prediction model based on deep learning and radiomics features of DWI for the assessment of microsatellite instability in endometrial cancer
Background
To explore the efficacy of a prediction model based on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) features extracted from deep learning (DL) and radiomics combined with clinical parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values to identify microsatellite instability (MSI) in endometrial cancer (EC).
Methods
This study included a cohort of 116 patients with EC, who were subsequently divided into training (n = 81) and test (n = 35) sets. From DWI, conventional radiomics features and convolutional neural network-based DL features were extracted. Random forest (RF) and logistic regression were adopted as classifiers. DL features, radiomics features, clinical variables, ADC values, and their combinations were applied to establish DL, radiomics, clinical, ADC, and combined models, respectively. The predictive performance was evaluated through the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), total integrated discrimination index (IDI), net reclassification index (NRI), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).
Results
The optimal predictive model, based on an RF classifier, comprised four DL features, three radiomics features, two clinical variables, and an ADC value. In the training and test sets, this model exhibited AUC values of 0.989 (95% CI: 0.935–1.000) and 0.885 (95% CI: 0.731–0.967), respectively, demonstrating different degrees of improvement compared with the clinical, DL, radiomics, and ADC models (AUC-training = 0.671, 0.873, 0.833, and 0.814, AUC-test = 0.685, 0.783, 0.708, and 0.713, respectively). The NRI and IDI analyses revealed that the combined model resulted in improved risk reclassification of the MSI status compared to the clinical, radiomics, DL, and ADC models. The calibration curves and DCA indicated good consistency and clinical utility of this model, respectively.
Conclusions
The predictive model based on DWI features extracted from DL and radiomics combined with clinical parameters and ADC values could effectively assess the MSI status in EC.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas:
Clinical Cancer Research
Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations
Cancer Biology:
Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery.
Cancer Prevention:
Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach.
Bioinformatics:
Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers.
Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.