Daniel J Vis, Patricia Jaaks, Nanne Aben, Elizabeth A Coker, Syd Barthorpe, Alexandra Beck, Caitlin Hall, James Hall, Howard Lightfoot, Ermira Lleshi, Tatiana Mironenko, Laura Richardson, Charlotte Tolley, Mathew J Garnett, Lodewyk F A Wessels
{"title":"泛癌症筛选可在个体和群体水平上确定联合用药对癌症细胞系的益处。","authors":"Daniel J Vis, Patricia Jaaks, Nanne Aben, Elizabeth A Coker, Syd Barthorpe, Alexandra Beck, Caitlin Hall, James Hall, Howard Lightfoot, Ermira Lleshi, Tatiana Mironenko, Laura Richardson, Charlotte Tolley, Mathew J Garnett, Lodewyk F A Wessels","doi":"10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Combining drugs can enhance their clinical efficacy, but the number of possible combinations and inter-tumor heterogeneity make identifying effective combinations challenging, while existing approaches often overlook clinically relevant activity. We screen one of the largest cell line panels (N = 757) with 51 clinically relevant combinations and identify responses at the level of individual cell lines and tissue populations. We establish three response classes to model cellular effects beyond monotherapy: synergy, Bliss additivity, and independent drug action (IDA). Synergy is rare (11% of responses) and frequently efficacious (>50% viability reduction), whereas Bliss and IDA are more frequent but less frequently efficacious. We introduce \"efficacious combination benefit\" (ECB) to describe high-efficacy responses classified as either synergy, Bliss, or IDA. We identify ECB biomarkers in vitro and show that ECB predicts response in patient-derived xenografts better than synergy alone. Our work here provides a valuable resource and framework for preclinical evaluation and the development of combination treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":9822,"journal":{"name":"Cell Reports Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384948/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A pan-cancer screen identifies drug combination benefit in cancer cell lines at the individual and population level.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel J Vis, Patricia Jaaks, Nanne Aben, Elizabeth A Coker, Syd Barthorpe, Alexandra Beck, Caitlin Hall, James Hall, Howard Lightfoot, Ermira Lleshi, Tatiana Mironenko, Laura Richardson, Charlotte Tolley, Mathew J Garnett, Lodewyk F A Wessels\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Combining drugs can enhance their clinical efficacy, but the number of possible combinations and inter-tumor heterogeneity make identifying effective combinations challenging, while existing approaches often overlook clinically relevant activity. We screen one of the largest cell line panels (N = 757) with 51 clinically relevant combinations and identify responses at the level of individual cell lines and tissue populations. We establish three response classes to model cellular effects beyond monotherapy: synergy, Bliss additivity, and independent drug action (IDA). Synergy is rare (11% of responses) and frequently efficacious (>50% viability reduction), whereas Bliss and IDA are more frequent but less frequently efficacious. We introduce \\\"efficacious combination benefit\\\" (ECB) to describe high-efficacy responses classified as either synergy, Bliss, or IDA. We identify ECB biomarkers in vitro and show that ECB predicts response in patient-derived xenografts better than synergy alone. Our work here provides a valuable resource and framework for preclinical evaluation and the development of combination treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cell Reports Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384948/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cell Reports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101687\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Reports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101687","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
联合用药可以提高药物的临床疗效,但可能的联合用药数量和肿瘤间的异质性使得确定有效的联合用药具有挑战性,而现有的方法往往忽略了临床相关的活性。我们用 51 种临床相关组合筛选了最大的细胞系面板之一(N = 757),并确定了单个细胞系和组织群水平的反应。我们建立了三个反应类别,以模拟单药治疗以外的细胞效应:协同作用、布利斯加成作用和独立药物作用(IDA)。协同作用很少见(占反应的 11%),但经常有效(存活率降低 >50%),而 Bliss 和 IDA 更常见,但疗效较差。我们引入了 "高效联合效益"(ECB)来描述被归类为协同作用、Bliss 或 IDA 的高效反应。我们在体外确定了 ECB 的生物标志物,并证明 ECB 比单独的协同作用更能预测患者衍生异种移植物的反应。我们在此开展的工作为临床前评估和开发联合疗法提供了宝贵的资源和框架。
A pan-cancer screen identifies drug combination benefit in cancer cell lines at the individual and population level.
Combining drugs can enhance their clinical efficacy, but the number of possible combinations and inter-tumor heterogeneity make identifying effective combinations challenging, while existing approaches often overlook clinically relevant activity. We screen one of the largest cell line panels (N = 757) with 51 clinically relevant combinations and identify responses at the level of individual cell lines and tissue populations. We establish three response classes to model cellular effects beyond monotherapy: synergy, Bliss additivity, and independent drug action (IDA). Synergy is rare (11% of responses) and frequently efficacious (>50% viability reduction), whereas Bliss and IDA are more frequent but less frequently efficacious. We introduce "efficacious combination benefit" (ECB) to describe high-efficacy responses classified as either synergy, Bliss, or IDA. We identify ECB biomarkers in vitro and show that ECB predicts response in patient-derived xenografts better than synergy alone. Our work here provides a valuable resource and framework for preclinical evaluation and the development of combination treatments.
Cell Reports MedicineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
231
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍:
Cell Reports Medicine is an esteemed open-access journal by Cell Press that publishes groundbreaking research in translational and clinical biomedical sciences, influencing human health and medicine.
Our journal ensures wide visibility and accessibility, reaching scientists and clinicians across various medical disciplines. We publish original research that spans from intriguing human biology concepts to all aspects of clinical work. We encourage submissions that introduce innovative ideas, forging new paths in clinical research and practice. We also welcome studies that provide vital information, enhancing our understanding of current standards of care in diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. This encompasses translational studies, clinical trials (including long-term follow-ups), genomics, biomarker discovery, and technological advancements that contribute to diagnostics, treatment, and healthcare. Additionally, studies based on vertebrate model organisms are within the scope of the journal, as long as they directly relate to human health and disease.