泛癌症筛选可在个体和群体水平上确定联合用药对癌症细胞系的益处。

IF 11.7 1区 医学 Q1 CELL BIOLOGY Cell Reports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101687
Daniel J Vis, Patricia Jaaks, Nanne Aben, Elizabeth A Coker, Syd Barthorpe, Alexandra Beck, Caitlin Hall, James Hall, Howard Lightfoot, Ermira Lleshi, Tatiana Mironenko, Laura Richardson, Charlotte Tolley, Mathew J Garnett, Lodewyk F A Wessels
{"title":"泛癌症筛选可在个体和群体水平上确定联合用药对癌症细胞系的益处。","authors":"Daniel J Vis, Patricia Jaaks, Nanne Aben, Elizabeth A Coker, Syd Barthorpe, Alexandra Beck, Caitlin Hall, James Hall, Howard Lightfoot, Ermira Lleshi, Tatiana Mironenko, Laura Richardson, Charlotte Tolley, Mathew J Garnett, Lodewyk F A Wessels","doi":"10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Combining drugs can enhance their clinical efficacy, but the number of possible combinations and inter-tumor heterogeneity make identifying effective combinations challenging, while existing approaches often overlook clinically relevant activity. We screen one of the largest cell line panels (N = 757) with 51 clinically relevant combinations and identify responses at the level of individual cell lines and tissue populations. We establish three response classes to model cellular effects beyond monotherapy: synergy, Bliss additivity, and independent drug action (IDA). Synergy is rare (11% of responses) and frequently efficacious (>50% viability reduction), whereas Bliss and IDA are more frequent but less frequently efficacious. We introduce \"efficacious combination benefit\" (ECB) to describe high-efficacy responses classified as either synergy, Bliss, or IDA. We identify ECB biomarkers in vitro and show that ECB predicts response in patient-derived xenografts better than synergy alone. Our work here provides a valuable resource and framework for preclinical evaluation and the development of combination treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":9822,"journal":{"name":"Cell Reports Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384948/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A pan-cancer screen identifies drug combination benefit in cancer cell lines at the individual and population level.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel J Vis, Patricia Jaaks, Nanne Aben, Elizabeth A Coker, Syd Barthorpe, Alexandra Beck, Caitlin Hall, James Hall, Howard Lightfoot, Ermira Lleshi, Tatiana Mironenko, Laura Richardson, Charlotte Tolley, Mathew J Garnett, Lodewyk F A Wessels\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Combining drugs can enhance their clinical efficacy, but the number of possible combinations and inter-tumor heterogeneity make identifying effective combinations challenging, while existing approaches often overlook clinically relevant activity. We screen one of the largest cell line panels (N = 757) with 51 clinically relevant combinations and identify responses at the level of individual cell lines and tissue populations. We establish three response classes to model cellular effects beyond monotherapy: synergy, Bliss additivity, and independent drug action (IDA). Synergy is rare (11% of responses) and frequently efficacious (>50% viability reduction), whereas Bliss and IDA are more frequent but less frequently efficacious. We introduce \\\"efficacious combination benefit\\\" (ECB) to describe high-efficacy responses classified as either synergy, Bliss, or IDA. We identify ECB biomarkers in vitro and show that ECB predicts response in patient-derived xenografts better than synergy alone. Our work here provides a valuable resource and framework for preclinical evaluation and the development of combination treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cell Reports Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384948/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cell Reports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101687\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Reports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101687","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

联合用药可以提高药物的临床疗效,但可能的联合用药数量和肿瘤间的异质性使得确定有效的联合用药具有挑战性,而现有的方法往往忽略了临床相关的活性。我们用 51 种临床相关组合筛选了最大的细胞系面板之一(N = 757),并确定了单个细胞系和组织群水平的反应。我们建立了三个反应类别,以模拟单药治疗以外的细胞效应:协同作用、布利斯加成作用和独立药物作用(IDA)。协同作用很少见(占反应的 11%),但经常有效(存活率降低 >50%),而 Bliss 和 IDA 更常见,但疗效较差。我们引入了 "高效联合效益"(ECB)来描述被归类为协同作用、Bliss 或 IDA 的高效反应。我们在体外确定了 ECB 的生物标志物,并证明 ECB 比单独的协同作用更能预测患者衍生异种移植物的反应。我们在此开展的工作为临床前评估和开发联合疗法提供了宝贵的资源和框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A pan-cancer screen identifies drug combination benefit in cancer cell lines at the individual and population level.

Combining drugs can enhance their clinical efficacy, but the number of possible combinations and inter-tumor heterogeneity make identifying effective combinations challenging, while existing approaches often overlook clinically relevant activity. We screen one of the largest cell line panels (N = 757) with 51 clinically relevant combinations and identify responses at the level of individual cell lines and tissue populations. We establish three response classes to model cellular effects beyond monotherapy: synergy, Bliss additivity, and independent drug action (IDA). Synergy is rare (11% of responses) and frequently efficacious (>50% viability reduction), whereas Bliss and IDA are more frequent but less frequently efficacious. We introduce "efficacious combination benefit" (ECB) to describe high-efficacy responses classified as either synergy, Bliss, or IDA. We identify ECB biomarkers in vitro and show that ECB predicts response in patient-derived xenografts better than synergy alone. Our work here provides a valuable resource and framework for preclinical evaluation and the development of combination treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cell Reports Medicine
Cell Reports Medicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
231
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Cell Reports Medicine is an esteemed open-access journal by Cell Press that publishes groundbreaking research in translational and clinical biomedical sciences, influencing human health and medicine. Our journal ensures wide visibility and accessibility, reaching scientists and clinicians across various medical disciplines. We publish original research that spans from intriguing human biology concepts to all aspects of clinical work. We encourage submissions that introduce innovative ideas, forging new paths in clinical research and practice. We also welcome studies that provide vital information, enhancing our understanding of current standards of care in diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. This encompasses translational studies, clinical trials (including long-term follow-ups), genomics, biomarker discovery, and technological advancements that contribute to diagnostics, treatment, and healthcare. Additionally, studies based on vertebrate model organisms are within the scope of the journal, as long as they directly relate to human health and disease.
期刊最新文献
Concurrent SOS1 and MEK suppression inhibits signaling and growth of NF1-null melanoma. Degradation of IKZF1 prevents epigenetic progression of T cell exhaustion in an antigen-specific assay. Bifidobacteria with indole-3-lactic acid-producing capacity exhibit psychobiotic potential via reducing neuroinflammation. Lnc-H19-derived protein shapes the immunosuppressive microenvironment of glioblastoma. Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on cerebral circulation time in severe carotid artery stenosis: Results from the RIC-CCT trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1