改善严重脑损伤患者精神能力的系统筛查和记录:精神能力筛查评估工具(MCScreen)。

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1016/j.clinme.2024.100236
Lynne Turner-Stokes, Karima Benaichouche-Motam, William Goodison, Adam Altaie, Alice Howard, Patrick McKnight, Jessie Alfonso
{"title":"改善严重脑损伤患者精神能力的系统筛查和记录:精神能力筛查评估工具(MCScreen)。","authors":"Lynne Turner-Stokes, Karima Benaichouche-Motam, William Goodison, Adam Altaie, Alice Howard, Patrick McKnight, Jessie Alfonso","doi":"10.1016/j.clinme.2024.100236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For patients who may lack capacity, the Mental Capacity Act 2005 requires capacity to be assessed for each decision at the time that treatment is offered, but this is not practical for every element of basic care and intervention delivered to patients undergoing rehabilitation following acquired brain injury, especially if their needs are changing. In this quality improvement project, we introduced a system for screening Mental Capacity and documentation to identify patients with a) largely intact cognition for whom capacity may be reasonably be presumed, and b) those in prolonged disorders of consciousness who clearly lacked capacity for all decisions. This enabled the multidisciplinary team to concentrate on evaluation of capacity in the third group who had more nuanced ability and required detailed assessment or support for decision-making. Two rounds of audit demonstrated that implementation improved the consistency of assessment and documentation. Multicentre roll-out of this approach is now required.</p>","PeriodicalId":10492,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"100236"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11415571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the systematic screening and documentation of mental capacity for patients with severe brain injury: The Mental Capacity Screening assessment tool (MCScreen).\",\"authors\":\"Lynne Turner-Stokes, Karima Benaichouche-Motam, William Goodison, Adam Altaie, Alice Howard, Patrick McKnight, Jessie Alfonso\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinme.2024.100236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>For patients who may lack capacity, the Mental Capacity Act 2005 requires capacity to be assessed for each decision at the time that treatment is offered, but this is not practical for every element of basic care and intervention delivered to patients undergoing rehabilitation following acquired brain injury, especially if their needs are changing. In this quality improvement project, we introduced a system for screening Mental Capacity and documentation to identify patients with a) largely intact cognition for whom capacity may be reasonably be presumed, and b) those in prolonged disorders of consciousness who clearly lacked capacity for all decisions. This enabled the multidisciplinary team to concentrate on evaluation of capacity in the third group who had more nuanced ability and required detailed assessment or support for decision-making. Two rounds of audit demonstrated that implementation improved the consistency of assessment and documentation. Multicentre roll-out of this approach is now required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11415571/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinme.2024.100236\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinme.2024.100236","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于可能缺乏行为能力的患者,2005 年《心智能力法》要求在提供治疗时对每项决定的行为能力进行评估,但这对于为后天性脑损伤后接受康复治疗的患者提供基本护理和干预的每项内容来说都不切实际,尤其是当他们的需求在不断变化时。在这一质量改进项目中,我们引入了一套精神行为能力筛查系统和文件系统,以识别 a) 认知能力基本完好、可合理推定具有行为能力的患者,以及 b) 意识障碍持续时间较长、明显缺乏做出所有决定能力的患者。这样,多学科团队就能集中精力对第三类患者的能力进行评估,这些患者的能力更为细微,需要详细评估或决策支持。两轮审核结果表明,该方法的实施提高了评估和文件记录的一致性。现在需要在多中心推广这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving the systematic screening and documentation of mental capacity for patients with severe brain injury: The Mental Capacity Screening assessment tool (MCScreen).

For patients who may lack capacity, the Mental Capacity Act 2005 requires capacity to be assessed for each decision at the time that treatment is offered, but this is not practical for every element of basic care and intervention delivered to patients undergoing rehabilitation following acquired brain injury, especially if their needs are changing. In this quality improvement project, we introduced a system for screening Mental Capacity and documentation to identify patients with a) largely intact cognition for whom capacity may be reasonably be presumed, and b) those in prolonged disorders of consciousness who clearly lacked capacity for all decisions. This enabled the multidisciplinary team to concentrate on evaluation of capacity in the third group who had more nuanced ability and required detailed assessment or support for decision-making. Two rounds of audit demonstrated that implementation improved the consistency of assessment and documentation. Multicentre roll-out of this approach is now required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Medicine
Clinical Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Medicine is aimed at practising physicians in the UK and overseas and has relevance to all those managing or working within the healthcare sector. Available in print and online, the journal seeks to encourage high standards of medical care by promoting good clinical practice through original research, review and comment. The journal also includes a dedicated continuing medical education (CME) section in each issue. This presents the latest advances in a chosen specialty, with self-assessment questions at the end of each topic enabling CPD accreditation to be acquired. ISSN: 1470-2118 E-ISSN: 1473-4893 Frequency: 6 issues per year
期刊最新文献
Impact on clinical outcomes, surgical interventions, anaesthetic decisions and complication rates following implementation of the NICE OSA guidelines during preoperative screening. Thromboelastography for Rapid Diagnosis of Heparin-Like Anticoagulant Release During Anaphylaxis-Induced Coagulopathy in Systemic Mastocytosis: A Case Report. The feasibility of a novel national Quality Improvement programme for Tobacco Dependency Treatment Pathways in acute UK hospitals. KEY CONCEPTS IN DIAGNOSING INFECTION- WHEN TO TREAT AND WHEN NOT TO. Diabetic Ketoacidosis and Hyperglycemic Hyperosmolar Syndrome in Patients with Cancer: A Multicenter Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1