在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,短期双联抗血小板疗法后的替卡格雷单药治疗与持续双联抗血小板疗法的比较:最新荟萃分析。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Coronary artery disease Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1097/MCA.0000000000001417
Zeeshan Mansuri, Hadiah Ashraf, Thahsin Taikadan, Gokul Rajith, Ayesha Ayesha, Urooj Fatima, Gabriel Erzinger
{"title":"在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,短期双联抗血小板疗法后的替卡格雷单药治疗与持续双联抗血小板疗法的比较:最新荟萃分析。","authors":"Zeeshan Mansuri, Hadiah Ashraf, Thahsin Taikadan, Gokul Rajith, Ayesha Ayesha, Urooj Fatima, Gabriel Erzinger","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimum duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remains controversial. Ticagrelor monotherapy after short duration of DAPT (1-3 months) is a subject of research. We conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the ticagrelor monotherapy with continued DAPT after short duration of DAPT in patients with ACS undergoing PCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies comparing ticagrelor monotherapy to DAPT after PCI and reported the outcomes of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE); net adverse clinical events (NACE); myocardial infarction (MI); major bleeding; death from any cause; definite or probable stent thrombosis; and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Data were extracted from published reports and quality assessment was performed per Cochrane recommendations. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager (Cochrane collaboration). Heterogeneity was examined with I2 test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3,208 results, five studies with 21,407 patients were included of which 50% received ticagrelor monotherapy. Studies had reported follow up of 12 months. Major bleeding [hazard ratio 0.47; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37-0.61; P  < 0.001], NACE (hazard ratio 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56-0.90; P  = 0.005), and all-cause death (hazard ratio 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.98; P  = 0.04) were significantly less with ticagrelor monotherapy. Other outcomes were comparable in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with ACS undergoing PCI, ticagrelor monotherapy reduces major bleeding, NACE and all-cause death as compared to continued DAPT for 12 months. Major ischemic outcomes were similar. Ticagrelor monotherapy is the way forward after short duration of DAPT after PCI in ACS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ticagrelor monotherapy after short duration of dual antiplatelet therapy compared to continued dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: an updated meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zeeshan Mansuri, Hadiah Ashraf, Thahsin Taikadan, Gokul Rajith, Ayesha Ayesha, Urooj Fatima, Gabriel Erzinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimum duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remains controversial. Ticagrelor monotherapy after short duration of DAPT (1-3 months) is a subject of research. We conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the ticagrelor monotherapy with continued DAPT after short duration of DAPT in patients with ACS undergoing PCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies comparing ticagrelor monotherapy to DAPT after PCI and reported the outcomes of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE); net adverse clinical events (NACE); myocardial infarction (MI); major bleeding; death from any cause; definite or probable stent thrombosis; and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Data were extracted from published reports and quality assessment was performed per Cochrane recommendations. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager (Cochrane collaboration). Heterogeneity was examined with I2 test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3,208 results, five studies with 21,407 patients were included of which 50% received ticagrelor monotherapy. Studies had reported follow up of 12 months. Major bleeding [hazard ratio 0.47; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37-0.61; P  < 0.001], NACE (hazard ratio 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56-0.90; P  = 0.005), and all-cause death (hazard ratio 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.98; P  = 0.04) were significantly less with ticagrelor monotherapy. Other outcomes were comparable in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with ACS undergoing PCI, ticagrelor monotherapy reduces major bleeding, NACE and all-cause death as compared to continued DAPT for 12 months. Major ischemic outcomes were similar. Ticagrelor monotherapy is the way forward after short duration of DAPT after PCI in ACS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coronary artery disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coronary artery disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001417\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronary artery disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001417","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后双联抗血小板疗法(DAPT)的最佳疗程仍存在争议。DAPT持续时间较短(1-3个月)后的替卡格雷单药治疗是一个研究课题。我们进行了一项最新的系统综述和荟萃分析,比较了在接受 PCI 治疗的 ACS 患者中,DAPT 持续时间较短后,替卡格雷单药治疗与持续 DAPT 治疗的效果:在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库中检索了PCI术后替卡格雷单药治疗与DAPT的比较研究,并报告了主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)、净不良临床事件(NACE)、心肌梗死(MI)、大出血、任何原因导致的死亡、明确或可能的支架血栓形成以及靶血管血运重建(TVR)的结果。从已发表的报告中提取数据,并根据 Cochrane 建议进行质量评估。统计分析使用Review Manager(Cochrane协作)进行。异质性采用I2检验:在 3208 项研究结果中,有 5 项研究纳入了 21 407 例患者,其中 50%接受了替卡格雷单药治疗。研究报告的随访时间为 12 个月。大出血[危险比为0.47;95%置信区间(CI)为0.37-0.61;P 结论:在接受PCI治疗的ACS患者中,大出血的危险比为0.47:对于接受 PCI 治疗的 ACS 患者,与持续 12 个月的 DAPT 相比,替卡格雷单药治疗可减少大出血、NACE 和全因死亡。主要缺血性结果相似。在 ACS 患者接受 PCI 后短期 DAPT 后,替卡格雷单药治疗是未来的发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ticagrelor monotherapy after short duration of dual antiplatelet therapy compared to continued dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: an updated meta-analysis.

Background: The optimum duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remains controversial. Ticagrelor monotherapy after short duration of DAPT (1-3 months) is a subject of research. We conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the ticagrelor monotherapy with continued DAPT after short duration of DAPT in patients with ACS undergoing PCI.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies comparing ticagrelor monotherapy to DAPT after PCI and reported the outcomes of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE); net adverse clinical events (NACE); myocardial infarction (MI); major bleeding; death from any cause; definite or probable stent thrombosis; and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Data were extracted from published reports and quality assessment was performed per Cochrane recommendations. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager (Cochrane collaboration). Heterogeneity was examined with I2 test.

Results: Of 3,208 results, five studies with 21,407 patients were included of which 50% received ticagrelor monotherapy. Studies had reported follow up of 12 months. Major bleeding [hazard ratio 0.47; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37-0.61; P  < 0.001], NACE (hazard ratio 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56-0.90; P  = 0.005), and all-cause death (hazard ratio 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.98; P  = 0.04) were significantly less with ticagrelor monotherapy. Other outcomes were comparable in both groups.

Conclusion: In patients with ACS undergoing PCI, ticagrelor monotherapy reduces major bleeding, NACE and all-cause death as compared to continued DAPT for 12 months. Major ischemic outcomes were similar. Ticagrelor monotherapy is the way forward after short duration of DAPT after PCI in ACS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Coronary artery disease
Coronary artery disease 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Coronary Artery Disease welcomes reports of original research with a clinical emphasis, including observational studies, clinical trials, translational research, novel imaging, pharmacology and interventional approaches as well as advances in laboratory research that contribute to the understanding of coronary artery disease. Each issue of Coronary Artery Disease is divided into four areas of focus: Original Research articles, Review in Depth articles by leading experts in the field, Editorials and Images in Coronary Artery Disease. The Editorials will comment on selected original research published in each issue of Coronary Artery Disease, as well as highlight controversies in coronary artery disease understanding and management. Submitted artcles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and​ peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between uric acid to albumin ratio and saphenous vein graft disease in patients with coronary artery bypass graft. Impact of prior coronary artery bypass grafting and coronary lesion complexity on outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis. Burden of cardiovascular disease on coronavirus disease 2019 hospitalizations in the USA. Non-chest pain symptoms and likelihood of coronary occlusion in emergency department patients with ST segment elevation undergoing emergent coronary angiography. Impact of serum iron levels on in-hospital mortality and clinical outcomes in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1