当代血液恶性肿瘤造血细胞移植中的人类白细胞抗原不匹配与存活率。

IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Journal of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1200/JCO.24.00582
Esteban Arrieta-Bolaños, Edouard F Bonneville, Pietro Crivello, Marie Robin, Tobias Gedde-Dahl, Urpu Salmenniemi, Nicolaus Kröger, Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha, Charles Crawley, Goda Choi, Annoek E C Broers, Edouard Forcade, Martin Carre, Xavier Poiré, Anne Huynh, Stig Lenhoff, Fabio Ciceri, Eleni Tholouli, Thomas Schroeder, Eric Deconinck, Kristina Carlson, Liesbeth C de Wreede, Jorinde D Hoogenboom, Florent Malard, Annalisa Ruggeri, Katharina Fleischhauer
{"title":"当代血液恶性肿瘤造血细胞移植中的人类白细胞抗原不匹配与存活率。","authors":"Esteban Arrieta-Bolaños, Edouard F Bonneville, Pietro Crivello, Marie Robin, Tobias Gedde-Dahl, Urpu Salmenniemi, Nicolaus Kröger, Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha, Charles Crawley, Goda Choi, Annoek E C Broers, Edouard Forcade, Martin Carre, Xavier Poiré, Anne Huynh, Stig Lenhoff, Fabio Ciceri, Eleni Tholouli, Thomas Schroeder, Eric Deconinck, Kristina Carlson, Liesbeth C de Wreede, Jorinde D Hoogenboom, Florent Malard, Annalisa Ruggeri, Katharina Fleischhauer","doi":"10.1200/JCO.24.00582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PURPOSEHuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatching can reduce survival of patients with blood cancer after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). How recent advances in HCT practice, in particular graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis by post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), influence HLA risk associations is unknown.PATIENTS AND METHODSThe study included 17,292 unrelated HCTs with 6-locus high-resolution HLA typing, performed mainly for acute leukemia or related myeloid neoplasms between 2016 and 2020, including 1,523 transplants with PTCy. HLA risk associations were evaluated by multivariable Cox regression models, with overall survival (OS) as primary end point.RESULTSOS was lower in HLA mismatched compared with fully matched transplants (hazard ratio [HR], 1.23 [99% CI, 1.14 to 1.33]; <i>P</i> < .001). This was driven by class I HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C (HR, 1.29 [99% CI, 1.19 to 1.41]; <i>P</i> < .001) but not class II HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1 (HR, 1.07 [99% CI, 0.93 to 1.23]; <i>P</i> = .19). Class I antigen-level mismatches were associated with worse OS than allele-level mismatches (HR, 1.36 [99% CI, 1.24 to 1.49]; <i>P</i> < .001), as were class I graft-versus-host peptide-binding motif (PBM) mismatches compared with matches (HR, 1.42 [99% CI, 1.28 to 1.59]; <i>P</i> < .001). The use of PTCy improved GVHD, relapse-free survival compared with conventional prophylaxis in HLA-matched transplants (HR, 0.77 [0.66 to 0.9]; <i>P</i> < .001). HLA mismatching increased mortality in PTCy transplants (HR, 1.32 [1.04 to 1.68]; <i>P</i> = .003) similarly as in non-PTCy transplants (interaction <i>P</i> = .43).CONCLUSIONClass I but not class II HLA mismatches, especially at the antigen and PBM level, are associated with inferior survival in contemporary unrelated HCT. These effects are not significantly different between non-PTCy compared with PTCy transplants. Optimized HLA matching should still be considered in modern HCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human Leukocyte Antigen Mismatching and Survival in Contemporary Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies.\",\"authors\":\"Esteban Arrieta-Bolaños, Edouard F Bonneville, Pietro Crivello, Marie Robin, Tobias Gedde-Dahl, Urpu Salmenniemi, Nicolaus Kröger, Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha, Charles Crawley, Goda Choi, Annoek E C Broers, Edouard Forcade, Martin Carre, Xavier Poiré, Anne Huynh, Stig Lenhoff, Fabio Ciceri, Eleni Tholouli, Thomas Schroeder, Eric Deconinck, Kristina Carlson, Liesbeth C de Wreede, Jorinde D Hoogenboom, Florent Malard, Annalisa Ruggeri, Katharina Fleischhauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/JCO.24.00582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>PURPOSEHuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatching can reduce survival of patients with blood cancer after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). How recent advances in HCT practice, in particular graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis by post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), influence HLA risk associations is unknown.PATIENTS AND METHODSThe study included 17,292 unrelated HCTs with 6-locus high-resolution HLA typing, performed mainly for acute leukemia or related myeloid neoplasms between 2016 and 2020, including 1,523 transplants with PTCy. HLA risk associations were evaluated by multivariable Cox regression models, with overall survival (OS) as primary end point.RESULTSOS was lower in HLA mismatched compared with fully matched transplants (hazard ratio [HR], 1.23 [99% CI, 1.14 to 1.33]; <i>P</i> < .001). This was driven by class I HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C (HR, 1.29 [99% CI, 1.19 to 1.41]; <i>P</i> < .001) but not class II HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1 (HR, 1.07 [99% CI, 0.93 to 1.23]; <i>P</i> = .19). Class I antigen-level mismatches were associated with worse OS than allele-level mismatches (HR, 1.36 [99% CI, 1.24 to 1.49]; <i>P</i> < .001), as were class I graft-versus-host peptide-binding motif (PBM) mismatches compared with matches (HR, 1.42 [99% CI, 1.28 to 1.59]; <i>P</i> < .001). The use of PTCy improved GVHD, relapse-free survival compared with conventional prophylaxis in HLA-matched transplants (HR, 0.77 [0.66 to 0.9]; <i>P</i> < .001). HLA mismatching increased mortality in PTCy transplants (HR, 1.32 [1.04 to 1.68]; <i>P</i> = .003) similarly as in non-PTCy transplants (interaction <i>P</i> = .43).CONCLUSIONClass I but not class II HLA mismatches, especially at the antigen and PBM level, are associated with inferior survival in contemporary unrelated HCT. These effects are not significantly different between non-PTCy compared with PTCy transplants. Optimized HLA matching should still be considered in modern HCT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":42.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00582\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00582","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:人类白细胞抗原(HLA)不匹配会降低造血细胞移植(HCT)后血癌患者的生存率。最近在造血干细胞移植实践中取得的进展,尤其是通过移植后环磷酰胺(PTCy)预防移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)如何影响 HLA 风险关联尚不清楚:该研究纳入了17,292例进行了6个位点高分辨率HLA分型的非亲缘HCT,主要是在2016年至2020年间进行的急性白血病或相关髓系肿瘤移植,其中包括1,523例进行了PTCy的移植。以总生存期(OS)为主要终点,通过多变量考克斯回归模型评估了HLA风险关联:结果:与完全匹配的移植相比,HLA不匹配的移植患者的OS较低(危险比[HR],1.23[99% CI, 1.14 to 1.33];P < .001)。造成这种情况的原因是 I 类 HLA-A、HLA-B、HLA-C(HR,1.29 [99% CI,1.19 至 1.41];P < .001),而非 II 类 HLA-DRB1 和 HLA-DQB1(HR,1.07 [99% CI,0.93 至 1.23];P = .19)。与等位基因水平错配相比,I类抗原水平错配与更差的OS相关(HR,1.36 [99% CI,1.24至1.49];P < .001),与匹配相比,I类移植物抗宿主肽结合基序(PBM)错配与更差的OS相关(HR,1.42 [99% CI,1.28至1.59];P < .001)。在HLA匹配的移植中,与传统预防相比,使用PTCy可提高GVHD和无复发生存率(HR,0.77 [0.66 to 0.9];P < .001)。HLA不匹配会增加PTCy移植患者的死亡率(HR,1.32 [1.04 至 1.68];P = .003),与非PTCy移植患者类似(交互作用P = .43):结论:第一类而非第二类 HLA 错配(尤其是抗原和 PBM 水平)与当代非亲缘 HCT 的低存活率有关。这些影响在非 PTCy 移植与 PTCy 移植之间没有明显差异。现代 HCT 仍应考虑优化 HLA 匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Human Leukocyte Antigen Mismatching and Survival in Contemporary Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies.

PURPOSEHuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatching can reduce survival of patients with blood cancer after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). How recent advances in HCT practice, in particular graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis by post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), influence HLA risk associations is unknown.PATIENTS AND METHODSThe study included 17,292 unrelated HCTs with 6-locus high-resolution HLA typing, performed mainly for acute leukemia or related myeloid neoplasms between 2016 and 2020, including 1,523 transplants with PTCy. HLA risk associations were evaluated by multivariable Cox regression models, with overall survival (OS) as primary end point.RESULTSOS was lower in HLA mismatched compared with fully matched transplants (hazard ratio [HR], 1.23 [99% CI, 1.14 to 1.33]; P < .001). This was driven by class I HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C (HR, 1.29 [99% CI, 1.19 to 1.41]; P < .001) but not class II HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1 (HR, 1.07 [99% CI, 0.93 to 1.23]; P = .19). Class I antigen-level mismatches were associated with worse OS than allele-level mismatches (HR, 1.36 [99% CI, 1.24 to 1.49]; P < .001), as were class I graft-versus-host peptide-binding motif (PBM) mismatches compared with matches (HR, 1.42 [99% CI, 1.28 to 1.59]; P < .001). The use of PTCy improved GVHD, relapse-free survival compared with conventional prophylaxis in HLA-matched transplants (HR, 0.77 [0.66 to 0.9]; P < .001). HLA mismatching increased mortality in PTCy transplants (HR, 1.32 [1.04 to 1.68]; P = .003) similarly as in non-PTCy transplants (interaction P = .43).CONCLUSIONClass I but not class II HLA mismatches, especially at the antigen and PBM level, are associated with inferior survival in contemporary unrelated HCT. These effects are not significantly different between non-PTCy compared with PTCy transplants. Optimized HLA matching should still be considered in modern HCT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
8215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Study Report and Individual Participant Data Transparency for US Food and Drug Administration-Approved Anticancer Drugs: A Call for Systematic Data Availability. Stockholm3 in a Multiethnic Cohort for Prostate Cancer Detection (SEPTA): A Prospective Multicentered Trial. Prospective Study of Supplemental Screening With Contrast-Enhanced Mammography in Women With Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer: Results of the Prevalence Round. How Could We Further Improve the Gilteritinib Maintenance After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in FLT3-Mutated AML? Reply to S. Fuji.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1