心理健康服务提供者对支持远程测量护理的移动医疗应用程序的看法:挑战与影响。

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychological Services Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1037/ser0000884
Bella Etingen, Mark S Zocchi, Robin T Higashi, Jennifer A Palmer, Eric Richardson, Felicia R Bixler, Jamie Patrianakos, Nicholas McMahon, Bridget M Smith, Ibuola Kale, John C Fortney, Carolyn Turvey, Jessica M Lipschitz, Jennifer A Evans, Kathleen L Frisbee, Timothy P Hogan
{"title":"心理健康服务提供者对支持远程测量护理的移动医疗应用程序的看法:挑战与影响。","authors":"Bella Etingen, Mark S Zocchi, Robin T Higashi, Jennifer A Palmer, Eric Richardson, Felicia R Bixler, Jamie Patrianakos, Nicholas McMahon, Bridget M Smith, Ibuola Kale, John C Fortney, Carolyn Turvey, Jessica M Lipschitz, Jennifer A Evans, Kathleen L Frisbee, Timothy P Hogan","doi":"10.1037/ser0000884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measurement-based care (MBC) comprises collecting patient-reported outcomes data using validated assessments and using that information to support treatment. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has developed technology platforms to support MBC, including the Mental Health Checkup (MHC) mobile health application (app). Our objective was to examine VHA mental health provider perspectives on the MHC app. We completed a mixed-methods, sequential explanatory evaluation of MHC. We surveyed 284 VHA mental health providers who used MHC, then conducted semistructured telephone interviews with a purposefully selected subset of survey respondents (<i>n</i> = 20). Approximately half of survey respondents agreed that MHC allowed them to collect assessment data from veterans more frequently than before (51%) and that they more frequently discussed assessment results with veterans because of MHC (50%) and used those results to inform goal-setting discussions (50%) and treatment decision making (51%). Bivariate analyses indicated a positive relationship between frequency of MHC use and the aforementioned impacts on care. Interview data conveyed both advantages (e.g., increased treatment efficiency, improved treatment decision making) and challenges (e.g., limited assessment availability, difficulties engaging veterans in completing assessments through the app) to using MHC. This evaluation demonstrated how MHC supported providers working to implement MBC. The app enhanced their ability to reach and engage veterans and incorporate assessment data into clinical encounters. Still, many did not perceive that MHC was impactful on mental health care delivery; given that providers who used MHC more frequently reported more positive impressions of MHC, this may be related to how frequently they used the app. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mental health provider perspectives on a mobile health application to support remote measurement-based care: Challenges and impacts.\",\"authors\":\"Bella Etingen, Mark S Zocchi, Robin T Higashi, Jennifer A Palmer, Eric Richardson, Felicia R Bixler, Jamie Patrianakos, Nicholas McMahon, Bridget M Smith, Ibuola Kale, John C Fortney, Carolyn Turvey, Jessica M Lipschitz, Jennifer A Evans, Kathleen L Frisbee, Timothy P Hogan\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ser0000884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Measurement-based care (MBC) comprises collecting patient-reported outcomes data using validated assessments and using that information to support treatment. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has developed technology platforms to support MBC, including the Mental Health Checkup (MHC) mobile health application (app). Our objective was to examine VHA mental health provider perspectives on the MHC app. We completed a mixed-methods, sequential explanatory evaluation of MHC. We surveyed 284 VHA mental health providers who used MHC, then conducted semistructured telephone interviews with a purposefully selected subset of survey respondents (<i>n</i> = 20). Approximately half of survey respondents agreed that MHC allowed them to collect assessment data from veterans more frequently than before (51%) and that they more frequently discussed assessment results with veterans because of MHC (50%) and used those results to inform goal-setting discussions (50%) and treatment decision making (51%). Bivariate analyses indicated a positive relationship between frequency of MHC use and the aforementioned impacts on care. Interview data conveyed both advantages (e.g., increased treatment efficiency, improved treatment decision making) and challenges (e.g., limited assessment availability, difficulties engaging veterans in completing assessments through the app) to using MHC. This evaluation demonstrated how MHC supported providers working to implement MBC. The app enhanced their ability to reach and engage veterans and incorporate assessment data into clinical encounters. Still, many did not perceive that MHC was impactful on mental health care delivery; given that providers who used MHC more frequently reported more positive impressions of MHC, this may be related to how frequently they used the app. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Services\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000884\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000884","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于测量的护理(MBC)包括使用经过验证的评估方法收集患者报告的结果数据,并利用这些信息来支持治疗。退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)开发了支持 MBC 的技术平台,包括心理健康检查(MHC)移动健康应用程序(App)。我们的目标是研究退伍军人健康管理局心理健康提供者对 MHC 应用程序的看法。我们采用混合方法对 MHC 进行了顺序解释性评估。我们调查了 284 名使用 MHC 的退伍军人管理局心理健康服务提供者,然后对调查对象中特意挑选出的一个子集(n = 20)进行了半结构化电话访谈。约有一半的调查对象认为,MHC 使他们能够比以前更频繁地收集退伍军人的评估数据(51%),而且由于使用了 MHC,他们更频繁地与退伍军人讨论评估结果(50%),并将这些结果用于目标设定讨论(50%)和治疗决策制定(51%)。双变量分析表明,MHC 的使用频率与上述对护理的影响之间存在正相关关系。访谈数据显示了使用 MHC 的优势(如提高治疗效率、改善治疗决策)和挑战(如评估可用性有限、难以让退伍军人通过应用程序完成评估)。这项评估显示了 MHC 如何支持医疗服务提供者努力实施 MBC。该应用程序提高了医疗服务提供者接触和吸引退伍军人的能力,并将评估数据纳入临床治疗。尽管如此,许多人并不认为心理健康中心对心理健康护理的提供产生了影响;鉴于那些更频繁使用心理健康中心的医疗服务提供者对心理健康中心的印象更为正面,这可能与他们使用该应用程序的频率有关。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mental health provider perspectives on a mobile health application to support remote measurement-based care: Challenges and impacts.

Measurement-based care (MBC) comprises collecting patient-reported outcomes data using validated assessments and using that information to support treatment. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has developed technology platforms to support MBC, including the Mental Health Checkup (MHC) mobile health application (app). Our objective was to examine VHA mental health provider perspectives on the MHC app. We completed a mixed-methods, sequential explanatory evaluation of MHC. We surveyed 284 VHA mental health providers who used MHC, then conducted semistructured telephone interviews with a purposefully selected subset of survey respondents (n = 20). Approximately half of survey respondents agreed that MHC allowed them to collect assessment data from veterans more frequently than before (51%) and that they more frequently discussed assessment results with veterans because of MHC (50%) and used those results to inform goal-setting discussions (50%) and treatment decision making (51%). Bivariate analyses indicated a positive relationship between frequency of MHC use and the aforementioned impacts on care. Interview data conveyed both advantages (e.g., increased treatment efficiency, improved treatment decision making) and challenges (e.g., limited assessment availability, difficulties engaging veterans in completing assessments through the app) to using MHC. This evaluation demonstrated how MHC supported providers working to implement MBC. The app enhanced their ability to reach and engage veterans and incorporate assessment data into clinical encounters. Still, many did not perceive that MHC was impactful on mental health care delivery; given that providers who used MHC more frequently reported more positive impressions of MHC, this may be related to how frequently they used the app. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
期刊最新文献
Equity and access of a civilian-based crisis response model. An evaluation of youth mental health first aid training with law enforcement officers. Implementing family-based interventions in opioid treatment programs: Preferences for method of delivery. Professional firefighters: Findings from the National Wellness Survey for Public Safety Personnel. A qualitative study of special operations forces chaplaincy teams' relationship building for suicide prevention, intervention, and postvention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1