2018-2019年加拿大埃德蒙顿外展人群性传播疾病检测和治疗经济激励的回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Sexually transmitted diseases Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002068
Jessica Krahn, Jennifer Gratrix, MuhammadNaeem Khan, Garret Meyer, Petra Smyczek, Ameeta E Singh
{"title":"2018-2019年加拿大埃德蒙顿外展人群性传播疾病检测和治疗经济激励的回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Jessica Krahn, Jennifer Gratrix, MuhammadNaeem Khan, Garret Meyer, Petra Smyczek, Ameeta E Singh","doi":"10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STI) continues to increase worldwide. Patient incentives are one proposed intervention to increase STI testing and treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing incentivized versus routine care for STI outreach test and treat services between October 2018 and June 2019. Incentivized care included a $10 gift card for testing visits and an additional $10 gift card for results and/or treatment visits. Incentivized visits were offered to clients with a lack of housing, who were difficult to locate, or had a history of being lost to follow-up. All test and treatment visits included chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, and HIV testing and/or treatment by Registered Nurses and outreach workers from an STI Clinic. Outreach visits were offered at subsidized housing locations, community-based organizations, and street outreach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From October 2018 to June 2019, 2384 outreach clients were reached: 453 (19.0%) received incentives and 1931 (81.0%) received routine care. There were no significant differences in case-finding rates for chlamydia (4.8%), gonorrhea (2.9%), and HIV (0.1%); however, there was for syphilis (3.8% for incentivized vs. 1.9% for routine visits; P = 0.02). All newly diagnosed infections identified in the incentivized group received treatment compared with routine visits (chlamydia 100% vs 79.1%, P = 0.008, gonorrhea 100% vs 59.7%, P = 0.002, and syphilis 100% vs. 86.7%, P = 0.08).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incentives were associated with increased case-finding rates of syphilis and were associated with 100% treatment rates. Incentives are a promising approach to decreasing the burden of STI among outreach populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21837,"journal":{"name":"Sexually transmitted diseases","volume":" ","pages":"37-42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective Cohort Study of Financial Incentives for Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing and Treatment in an Outreach Population in Edmonton, Canada, 2018-2019.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Krahn, Jennifer Gratrix, MuhammadNaeem Khan, Garret Meyer, Petra Smyczek, Ameeta E Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STI) continues to increase worldwide. Patient incentives are one proposed intervention to increase STI testing and treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing incentivized versus routine care for STI outreach test and treat services between October 2018 and June 2019. Incentivized care included a $10 gift card for testing visits and an additional $10 gift card for results and/or treatment visits. Incentivized visits were offered to clients with a lack of housing, who were difficult to locate, or had a history of being lost to follow-up. All test and treatment visits included chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, and HIV testing and/or treatment by Registered Nurses and outreach workers from an STI Clinic. Outreach visits were offered at subsidized housing locations, community-based organizations, and street outreach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From October 2018 to June 2019, 2384 outreach clients were reached: 453 (19.0%) received incentives and 1931 (81.0%) received routine care. There were no significant differences in case-finding rates for chlamydia (4.8%), gonorrhea (2.9%), and HIV (0.1%); however, there was for syphilis (3.8% for incentivized vs. 1.9% for routine visits; P = 0.02). All newly diagnosed infections identified in the incentivized group received treatment compared with routine visits (chlamydia 100% vs 79.1%, P = 0.008, gonorrhea 100% vs 59.7%, P = 0.002, and syphilis 100% vs. 86.7%, P = 0.08).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incentives were associated with increased case-finding rates of syphilis and were associated with 100% treatment rates. Incentives are a promising approach to decreasing the burden of STI among outreach populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexually transmitted diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"37-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexually transmitted diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002068\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexually transmitted diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全世界性传播感染(STI)的发病率持续上升。激励患者是增加性传播感染检测和治疗的一项建议干预措施:我们开展了一项回顾性队列研究,比较了 2018 年 10 月至 2019 年 6 月期间性传播感染外展检测和治疗服务的激励护理与常规护理。激励性护理包括为检测就诊提供 10 美元的礼品卡,为检测结果和/或治疗就诊提供额外的 10 美元礼品卡。激励性就诊服务主要提供给没有住房、难以找到或有过随访失访史的客户。所有检测和治疗访问都包括衣原体、淋病、梅毒和艾滋病毒的检测和/或治疗,由注册护士和性传播感染诊所的外展工作人员进行。外展访问在补贴住房地点、社区组织和街头外展活动中提供:从 2018 年 10 月到 2019 年 6 月,共接触了 2384 名外联客户:453人(19.0%)接受了奖励,1931人(81.0%)接受了常规护理。衣原体(4.8%)、淋病(2.9%)和艾滋病病毒(0.1%)的病例发现率没有明显差异;但梅毒的病例发现率有明显差异(接受激励的病例发现率为 3.8%,接受常规访问的病例发现率为 1.9%;P = 0.02)。与常规就诊相比,激励组中所有新确诊的感染病例都得到了治疗(衣原体 100% 对 79.1%,p = 0.008;淋病 100% 对 59.7%,p = 0.002;梅毒 100% 对 86.7%,p = 0.08):结论:激励措施与梅毒病例发现率的提高有关,并且与100%的治疗率有关。激励措施是减轻外展人群性传播疾病负担的一种可行方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Retrospective Cohort Study of Financial Incentives for Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing and Treatment in an Outreach Population in Edmonton, Canada, 2018-2019.

Background: The incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STI) continues to increase worldwide. Patient incentives are one proposed intervention to increase STI testing and treatment.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing incentivized versus routine care for STI outreach test and treat services between October 2018 and June 2019. Incentivized care included a $10 gift card for testing visits and an additional $10 gift card for results and/or treatment visits. Incentivized visits were offered to clients with a lack of housing, who were difficult to locate, or had a history of being lost to follow-up. All test and treatment visits included chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, and HIV testing and/or treatment by Registered Nurses and outreach workers from an STI Clinic. Outreach visits were offered at subsidized housing locations, community-based organizations, and street outreach.

Results: From October 2018 to June 2019, 2384 outreach clients were reached: 453 (19.0%) received incentives and 1931 (81.0%) received routine care. There were no significant differences in case-finding rates for chlamydia (4.8%), gonorrhea (2.9%), and HIV (0.1%); however, there was for syphilis (3.8% for incentivized vs. 1.9% for routine visits; P = 0.02). All newly diagnosed infections identified in the incentivized group received treatment compared with routine visits (chlamydia 100% vs 79.1%, P = 0.008, gonorrhea 100% vs 59.7%, P = 0.002, and syphilis 100% vs. 86.7%, P = 0.08).

Conclusions: Incentives were associated with increased case-finding rates of syphilis and were associated with 100% treatment rates. Incentives are a promising approach to decreasing the burden of STI among outreach populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sexually transmitted diseases
Sexually transmitted diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.10%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Sexually Transmitted Diseases, the official journal of the American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association​, publishes peer-reviewed, original articles on clinical, laboratory, immunologic, epidemiologic, behavioral, public health, and historical topics pertaining to sexually transmitted diseases and related fields. Reports from the CDC and NIH provide up-to-the-minute information. A highly respected editorial board is composed of prominent scientists who are leaders in this rapidly changing field. Included in each issue are studies and developments from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Willingness of Joining Online Support Groups Among Men Who Have Sex With Men Living With HIV in Shandong Province of China: A Mixed Methods Study. Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Opt-Out Screening of Justice-Involved Women During Intake at the Los Angeles County Jail: The Pivotal Role of Correctional Health Systems. Retrospective Cohort Study of Financial Incentives for Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing and Treatment in an Outreach Population in Edmonton, Canada, 2018-2019. Multilevel Drivers of Congenital Syphilis, Oregon, 2013 to 2021. Clinical Studies Are Needed to Determine the Efficacy of Ceftriaxone and Other Interventions in Addressing Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1