巴西变性妇女和 travestis 中用于检测性传播感染的体检:可接受性及相关因素。

Daniel Jason McCartney, Layana Guedes Carvalhal, Camila de Albuquerque Moraes, Philippe Mayaud, Maria Amélia de Sousa Mascena Veras
{"title":"巴西变性妇女和 travestis 中用于检测性传播感染的体检:可接受性及相关因素。","authors":"Daniel Jason McCartney, Layana Guedes Carvalhal, Camila de Albuquerque Moraes, Philippe Mayaud, Maria Amélia de Sousa Mascena Veras","doi":"10.1590/1980-549720240009.supl.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the acceptability and factors associated with uptake of a physical examination for the detection of symptomatic sexually transmitted infections (STIs) by transgender women and travestis in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TransOdara was a multi-centric, cross-sectional STI prevalence study conducted among transgender women and travestis in five capital cities (Campo Grande, Manaus, Porto Alegre, Salvador and São Paulo) representing all Brazilian regions, between December 2019 and July 2021. A total of 1,317 self-identified transgender women and travestis aged ≥18 years were recruited using respondent-driven sampling and responded to a standard questionnaire. A medical consultation was offered including a physical examination and collection of samples from multiple sites to detect various STIs. Factors associated with uptake were investigated by reviewing demographic characteristics of participants who gave permission for physical examination (general, genital, and anorectal).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants (65.4%, 95% confidence interval - 95%CI 62.7-68.0) gave permission for a general examination (including oropharyngeal), with fewer permitting genital (42.3%, 95%CI 39.6-46.0) or anorectal (42.1%, 95%CI 39.4-44.9) examinations. Overall, 34.4% (95%CI 31.8-37.0) of participants refused all examinations. Participants with STI symptoms were significantly more likely to give permission for full examination than asymptomatic participants (64.3 vs. 37.4%, adjusted odds ratio - AOR=3.6, 95%CI 2.4-5.5). Other factors significantly associated with uptake of a full examination in multivariate analysis included age (AOR=1.5 for ≥25 years), religion (AOR=1.7 for Afro-Brazilian, AOR=1.9 for other religions compared to no religion), and education (AOR=2.0 for higher-level).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the context of STI management, this study found limited acceptance of anogenital examinations among transgender women and travestis, with higher acceptance among those with STI symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":74697,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology","volume":"27Suppl 1 Suppl 1","pages":"e240009.supl.1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11338536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical examination for the detection of sexually transmitted infections among transgender women and travestis in Brazil: acceptability and associated factors.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Jason McCartney, Layana Guedes Carvalhal, Camila de Albuquerque Moraes, Philippe Mayaud, Maria Amélia de Sousa Mascena Veras\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1980-549720240009.supl.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the acceptability and factors associated with uptake of a physical examination for the detection of symptomatic sexually transmitted infections (STIs) by transgender women and travestis in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TransOdara was a multi-centric, cross-sectional STI prevalence study conducted among transgender women and travestis in five capital cities (Campo Grande, Manaus, Porto Alegre, Salvador and São Paulo) representing all Brazilian regions, between December 2019 and July 2021. A total of 1,317 self-identified transgender women and travestis aged ≥18 years were recruited using respondent-driven sampling and responded to a standard questionnaire. A medical consultation was offered including a physical examination and collection of samples from multiple sites to detect various STIs. Factors associated with uptake were investigated by reviewing demographic characteristics of participants who gave permission for physical examination (general, genital, and anorectal).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants (65.4%, 95% confidence interval - 95%CI 62.7-68.0) gave permission for a general examination (including oropharyngeal), with fewer permitting genital (42.3%, 95%CI 39.6-46.0) or anorectal (42.1%, 95%CI 39.4-44.9) examinations. Overall, 34.4% (95%CI 31.8-37.0) of participants refused all examinations. Participants with STI symptoms were significantly more likely to give permission for full examination than asymptomatic participants (64.3 vs. 37.4%, adjusted odds ratio - AOR=3.6, 95%CI 2.4-5.5). Other factors significantly associated with uptake of a full examination in multivariate analysis included age (AOR=1.5 for ≥25 years), religion (AOR=1.7 for Afro-Brazilian, AOR=1.9 for other religions compared to no religion), and education (AOR=2.0 for higher-level).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the context of STI management, this study found limited acceptance of anogenital examinations among transgender women and travestis, with higher acceptance among those with STI symptoms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"27Suppl 1 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"e240009.supl.1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11338536/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720240009.supl.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720240009.supl.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在确定巴西变性妇女和性工作者接受体检以检测无症状性传播感染(STI)的可接受性及其相关因素:TransOdara 是一项多中心、横断面性传播感染流行率研究,于 2019 年 12 月至 2021 年 7 月期间在代表巴西所有地区的五个首府城市(大坎波、马瑙斯、阿雷格里港、萨尔瓦多和圣保罗)对变性妇女和性工作者进行了调查。通过受访者驱动的抽样调查,共招募了 1317 名年龄≥18 岁的自我认同的变性女性和变性人,并对标准问卷进行了回答。他们接受了医疗咨询,包括身体检查和从多个部位采集样本以检测各种性传播感染。通过审查允许进行体检(全身、生殖器和肛门直肠)的参与者的人口统计学特征,调查了与接受体检相关的因素:结果:大多数参与者(65.4%,95% 置信区间 - 95%CI 62.7-68.0)允许进行一般检查(包括口咽检查),而允许进行生殖器检查(42.3%,95%CI 39.6-46.0)或肛门直肠检查(42.1%,95%CI 39.4-44.9)的人数较少。总体而言,34.4%(95%CI 31.8-37.0)的参与者拒绝所有检查。与无症状的参与者相比,有性传播感染症状的参与者更有可能同意接受全面检查(64.3% 对 37.4%,调整后的几率比 - AOR=3.6, 95%CI 2.4-5.5)。在多变量分析中,与接受全面检查明显相关的其他因素包括年龄(≥25 岁的 AOR=1.5 )、宗教信仰(非洲裔巴西人的 AOR=1.7 ,与无宗教信仰相比,其他宗教信仰的 AOR=1.9 )和教育程度(教育程度较高的 AOR=2.0 ):本研究发现,在性传播感染管理方面,变性妇女和性工作者对肛门生殖器检查的接受程度有限,而有性传播感染症状的变性妇女和性工作者对肛门生殖器检查的接受程度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Physical examination for the detection of sexually transmitted infections among transgender women and travestis in Brazil: acceptability and associated factors.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the acceptability and factors associated with uptake of a physical examination for the detection of symptomatic sexually transmitted infections (STIs) by transgender women and travestis in Brazil.

Methods: TransOdara was a multi-centric, cross-sectional STI prevalence study conducted among transgender women and travestis in five capital cities (Campo Grande, Manaus, Porto Alegre, Salvador and São Paulo) representing all Brazilian regions, between December 2019 and July 2021. A total of 1,317 self-identified transgender women and travestis aged ≥18 years were recruited using respondent-driven sampling and responded to a standard questionnaire. A medical consultation was offered including a physical examination and collection of samples from multiple sites to detect various STIs. Factors associated with uptake were investigated by reviewing demographic characteristics of participants who gave permission for physical examination (general, genital, and anorectal).

Results: Most participants (65.4%, 95% confidence interval - 95%CI 62.7-68.0) gave permission for a general examination (including oropharyngeal), with fewer permitting genital (42.3%, 95%CI 39.6-46.0) or anorectal (42.1%, 95%CI 39.4-44.9) examinations. Overall, 34.4% (95%CI 31.8-37.0) of participants refused all examinations. Participants with STI symptoms were significantly more likely to give permission for full examination than asymptomatic participants (64.3 vs. 37.4%, adjusted odds ratio - AOR=3.6, 95%CI 2.4-5.5). Other factors significantly associated with uptake of a full examination in multivariate analysis included age (AOR=1.5 for ≥25 years), religion (AOR=1.7 for Afro-Brazilian, AOR=1.9 for other religions compared to no religion), and education (AOR=2.0 for higher-level).

Conclusion: In the context of STI management, this study found limited acceptance of anogenital examinations among transgender women and travestis, with higher acceptance among those with STI symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Erratum. Socio-occupational conditions and health of fishers exposed to the oil disaster-crime in Pernambuco, Brazil. Places to purchase food in urban and rural areas of Brazil. Erratum. Erratum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1