炎症性肠病患者皮下注射英夫利西单抗的临界点。来自 ENEIDA 登记处的数据。

Marisa Iborra, Berta Caballol, Alejandro Garrido, José María Huguet, Francisco Mesonero, Ángel Ponferrada, Lara Arias García, Marta Maia Boscá Watts, Samuel J Fernández Prada, Eduard Brunet Mas, Ana Gutiérrez Casbas, Elena Cerrillo, Ingrid Ordás, Lucía Ruiz, Irene García de la Filia, Jaime Escobar Ortiz, Beatriz Sicilia, Elena Ricart, Eugeni Domènech, Pilar Nos
{"title":"炎症性肠病患者皮下注射英夫利西单抗的临界点。来自 ENEIDA 登记处的数据。","authors":"Marisa Iborra, Berta Caballol, Alejandro Garrido, José María Huguet, Francisco Mesonero, Ángel Ponferrada, Lara Arias García, Marta Maia Boscá Watts, Samuel J Fernández Prada, Eduard Brunet Mas, Ana Gutiérrez Casbas, Elena Cerrillo, Ingrid Ordás, Lucía Ruiz, Irene García de la Filia, Jaime Escobar Ortiz, Beatriz Sicilia, Elena Ricart, Eugeni Domènech, Pilar Nos","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Switching from the intravenous to the subcutaneous biosimilar infliximab (SC-IFX) has been shown to safely maintain clinical remission and increase drug levels in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term outcomes after switching from intravenous IFX (IV-IFX) to SC-IFX, the drug concentration thresholds for maintaining remission and other predictors for loss of response after the switch.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multicenter observational study involving CD and UC patients who were in clinical remission for at least 24 weeks and scheduled to switch from IV-IFX to SC-IFX.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and twenty patients were included [74 UC (34%) and 146 (66%) CD]. IV-IFX was administered for 52.5 months [range 25-89]. Pre-switch, 106 (49%) patients were receiving intensified IV-IFX. While SC-IFX levels significantly increased following the switch from IV to SC-IFX, clinical parameters, C-reactive protein and faecal calprotectin remained unchanged during follow-up. SC-IFX levels were significantly higher between patients receiving the standard IV-IFX dose than those with the intensified dose. Immunomodulator therapy at baseline and perianal disease had no effect on IFX trough levels, whereas higher body mass index was associated with increased levels. The suggested optimal SC-IFX cut-off concentration for clinical and biochemical remission based on ROC analysis was 12.2 μg/mL (AUC: 0.62) at week 12 and 13.2 μg/mL (AUC: 0.57) at week 52. Drug persistence was 92% at week 52, with a good safety profile.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Switching from IV-IFX to SC-IFX safely maintains long-term remission in patients with CD and UC. In maintenance, the optimal cut-off point associated with remission was 12-13 μg/mL.</p>","PeriodicalId":94074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohn's & colitis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subcutaneous infliximab cut-off points in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Data from the ENEIDA registry.\",\"authors\":\"Marisa Iborra, Berta Caballol, Alejandro Garrido, José María Huguet, Francisco Mesonero, Ángel Ponferrada, Lara Arias García, Marta Maia Boscá Watts, Samuel J Fernández Prada, Eduard Brunet Mas, Ana Gutiérrez Casbas, Elena Cerrillo, Ingrid Ordás, Lucía Ruiz, Irene García de la Filia, Jaime Escobar Ortiz, Beatriz Sicilia, Elena Ricart, Eugeni Domènech, Pilar Nos\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Switching from the intravenous to the subcutaneous biosimilar infliximab (SC-IFX) has been shown to safely maintain clinical remission and increase drug levels in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term outcomes after switching from intravenous IFX (IV-IFX) to SC-IFX, the drug concentration thresholds for maintaining remission and other predictors for loss of response after the switch.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multicenter observational study involving CD and UC patients who were in clinical remission for at least 24 weeks and scheduled to switch from IV-IFX to SC-IFX.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and twenty patients were included [74 UC (34%) and 146 (66%) CD]. IV-IFX was administered for 52.5 months [range 25-89]. Pre-switch, 106 (49%) patients were receiving intensified IV-IFX. While SC-IFX levels significantly increased following the switch from IV to SC-IFX, clinical parameters, C-reactive protein and faecal calprotectin remained unchanged during follow-up. SC-IFX levels were significantly higher between patients receiving the standard IV-IFX dose than those with the intensified dose. Immunomodulator therapy at baseline and perianal disease had no effect on IFX trough levels, whereas higher body mass index was associated with increased levels. The suggested optimal SC-IFX cut-off concentration for clinical and biochemical remission based on ROC analysis was 12.2 μg/mL (AUC: 0.62) at week 12 and 13.2 μg/mL (AUC: 0.57) at week 52. Drug persistence was 92% at week 52, with a good safety profile.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Switching from IV-IFX to SC-IFX safely maintains long-term remission in patients with CD and UC. In maintenance, the optimal cut-off point associated with remission was 12-13 μg/mL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Crohn's & colitis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Crohn's & colitis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohn's & colitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:研究表明,从静脉注射英夫利西单抗(IFX)转为皮下注射生物仿制药英夫利西单抗(SC-IFX)可安全地维持克罗恩病(CD)和溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者的临床缓解并提高药物浓度。本研究旨在评估从静脉注射IFX(IV-IFX)转为SC-IFX后的长期疗效、维持缓解的药物浓度阈值以及转药后反应消失的其他预测因素:多中心观察性研究:纳入临床缓解至少24周、计划从静脉注射IFX转为SC-IFX的CD和UC患者:研究共纳入 220 名患者[74 名 UC 患者(34%)和 146 名 CD 患者(66%)]。IV-IFX用药52.5个月[25-89个月不等]。切换前,106 名(49%)患者接受了强化 IV-IFX。从静脉注射转为 SC-IFX 后,SC-IFX 水平明显升高,但临床参数、C 反应蛋白和粪便钙蛋白在随访期间保持不变。接受标准 IV-IFX 剂量治疗的患者的 SC-IFX 水平明显高于接受强化剂量治疗的患者。基线免疫调节剂治疗和肛周疾病对IFX谷值水平没有影响,而体重指数越高,IFX谷值水平越高。根据ROC分析,临床和生化缓解的最佳SC-IFX临界浓度在第12周为12.2微克/毫升(AUC:0.62),在第52周为13.2微克/毫升(AUC:0.57)。第52周的药物持续率为92%,安全性良好:结论:从IV-IFX转为SC-IFX可安全地维持CD和UC患者的长期缓解。在维持治疗中,与缓解相关的最佳临界点为12-13 μg/mL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Subcutaneous infliximab cut-off points in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Data from the ENEIDA registry.

Background and aims: Switching from the intravenous to the subcutaneous biosimilar infliximab (SC-IFX) has been shown to safely maintain clinical remission and increase drug levels in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term outcomes after switching from intravenous IFX (IV-IFX) to SC-IFX, the drug concentration thresholds for maintaining remission and other predictors for loss of response after the switch.

Methods: Multicenter observational study involving CD and UC patients who were in clinical remission for at least 24 weeks and scheduled to switch from IV-IFX to SC-IFX.

Results: Two hundred and twenty patients were included [74 UC (34%) and 146 (66%) CD]. IV-IFX was administered for 52.5 months [range 25-89]. Pre-switch, 106 (49%) patients were receiving intensified IV-IFX. While SC-IFX levels significantly increased following the switch from IV to SC-IFX, clinical parameters, C-reactive protein and faecal calprotectin remained unchanged during follow-up. SC-IFX levels were significantly higher between patients receiving the standard IV-IFX dose than those with the intensified dose. Immunomodulator therapy at baseline and perianal disease had no effect on IFX trough levels, whereas higher body mass index was associated with increased levels. The suggested optimal SC-IFX cut-off concentration for clinical and biochemical remission based on ROC analysis was 12.2 μg/mL (AUC: 0.62) at week 12 and 13.2 μg/mL (AUC: 0.57) at week 52. Drug persistence was 92% at week 52, with a good safety profile.

Conclusion: Switching from IV-IFX to SC-IFX safely maintains long-term remission in patients with CD and UC. In maintenance, the optimal cut-off point associated with remission was 12-13 μg/mL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Etrasimod Corticosteroid-Free Efficacy, Impact of Concomitant Corticosteroids on Efficacy and Safety, and Corticosteroid-Sparing Effect in UC: Analyses of the ELEVATE UC Clinical Programme. Outcomes of patients with prior biologic intolerance are better than those with biologic failure in clinical trials of inflammatory bowel disease. Preventing Post-Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer in Inflammatory Bowel Disease-"The Big Five". Letter: Change in bowel urgency in active ulcerative colitis patients treated with Curcumin-QingDai (CurQD): A post-hoc analysis of a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Comparative Efficacy of Novel Biologics, Antitumour Necrosis Factor Agents, and Immunomodulators to Prevent Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1