不同能量来源对心房颤动球囊消融术中凝血生物标志物和无声脑事件的影响

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart Rhythm O2 Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hroo.2024.06.009
Masayuki Koshikawa MD, PhD , Masahide Harada MD, PhD , Yoshihiro Nomura MD , Asuka Nishimura MD , Yuji Motoike MD, PhD , Eiichi Watanabe MD, PhD , Yukio Ozaki MD, PhD , Hideo Izawa MD, PhD
{"title":"不同能量来源对心房颤动球囊消融术中凝血生物标志物和无声脑事件的影响","authors":"Masayuki Koshikawa MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Masahide Harada MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Nomura MD ,&nbsp;Asuka Nishimura MD ,&nbsp;Yuji Motoike MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Eiichi Watanabe MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yukio Ozaki MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hideo Izawa MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2024.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Different energy sources of balloon-based ablation for pulmonary vein isolation cause different kinds of endothelial damage and coagulation responses associated with thromboembolic risk.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The study sought to compare the impact of different balloon-based ablation, cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and laser balloon ablation (LBA), on coagulation/fibrinolysis biomarkers and silent cerebral events (SCEs) in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients who underwent pulmonary vein isolation using either CBA (n = 52) or LBA (n = 53) without radiofrequency touch-up ablation were eligible. Time course (day 0 [before ablation], day 1, day 2, and day 28) of myocardial enzymes and inflammatory and coagulation/fibrinolysis biomarkers was evaluated during the perioperative period. Brain magnetic resonance imaging was performed within 2 days after the procedure to evaluate SCEs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no difference in patient characteristics between CBA and LBA.CBA had greater myocardial injury (troponin I and creatine kinase-MB) and lower inflammatory reaction (white blood cell count and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio) than LBA. The coagulation biomarkers maximally increased by day 2 and then decreased in both groups. In day 28, the serum prothrombin fragment 1+2 and D-dimer levels in LBA were significantly higher than the values in CBA. The fibrinolysis biomarker (plasmin-α2 plasmin inhibitor complex) did not increase after the procedure in either group. The incidence of SCEs was comparable between CBA and LBA (11% vs 15%; <em>P =</em> .591). No thromboembolic event was observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CBA and LBA had different effects on myocardial injury, inflammatory reaction, and coagulation activity but did not affect the incidence of thromboembolic events. LBA had significantly higher coagulation activity in day 28 and may require more careful postprocedural anticoagulation than CBA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"5 8","pages":"Pages 520-528"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824001880/pdfft?md5=94804cafd76e32de73f22c1d48669cf0&pid=1-s2.0-S2666501824001880-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of different energy sources on coagulation biomarkers and silent cerebral events in balloon-based ablation for atrial fibrillation\",\"authors\":\"Masayuki Koshikawa MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Masahide Harada MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Nomura MD ,&nbsp;Asuka Nishimura MD ,&nbsp;Yuji Motoike MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Eiichi Watanabe MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yukio Ozaki MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hideo Izawa MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hroo.2024.06.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Different energy sources of balloon-based ablation for pulmonary vein isolation cause different kinds of endothelial damage and coagulation responses associated with thromboembolic risk.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The study sought to compare the impact of different balloon-based ablation, cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and laser balloon ablation (LBA), on coagulation/fibrinolysis biomarkers and silent cerebral events (SCEs) in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients who underwent pulmonary vein isolation using either CBA (n = 52) or LBA (n = 53) without radiofrequency touch-up ablation were eligible. Time course (day 0 [before ablation], day 1, day 2, and day 28) of myocardial enzymes and inflammatory and coagulation/fibrinolysis biomarkers was evaluated during the perioperative period. Brain magnetic resonance imaging was performed within 2 days after the procedure to evaluate SCEs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no difference in patient characteristics between CBA and LBA.CBA had greater myocardial injury (troponin I and creatine kinase-MB) and lower inflammatory reaction (white blood cell count and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio) than LBA. The coagulation biomarkers maximally increased by day 2 and then decreased in both groups. In day 28, the serum prothrombin fragment 1+2 and D-dimer levels in LBA were significantly higher than the values in CBA. The fibrinolysis biomarker (plasmin-α2 plasmin inhibitor complex) did not increase after the procedure in either group. The incidence of SCEs was comparable between CBA and LBA (11% vs 15%; <em>P =</em> .591). No thromboembolic event was observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CBA and LBA had different effects on myocardial injury, inflammatory reaction, and coagulation activity but did not affect the incidence of thromboembolic events. LBA had significantly higher coagulation activity in day 28 and may require more careful postprocedural anticoagulation than CBA.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart Rhythm O2\",\"volume\":\"5 8\",\"pages\":\"Pages 520-528\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824001880/pdfft?md5=94804cafd76e32de73f22c1d48669cf0&pid=1-s2.0-S2666501824001880-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart Rhythm O2\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824001880\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Rhythm O2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501824001880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景用于肺静脉隔离的不同能量来源的球囊消融会导致不同类型的内皮损伤和与血栓栓塞风险相关的凝血反应。该研究旨在比较不同的球囊消融(冷冻球囊消融(CBA)和激光球囊消融(LBA))对阵发性房颤患者凝血/纤溶生物标志物和无声脑事件(SCE)的影响。在围手术期评估了心肌酶、炎症和凝血/纤维蛋白溶解生物标志物的时间进程(第0天[消融前]、第1天、第2天和第28天)。与 LBA 相比,CBA 的心肌损伤(肌钙蛋白 I 和肌酸激酶-MB)更严重,炎症反应(白细胞计数和中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比率)更低。两组的凝血生物标志物都在第 2 天达到最大值,然后下降。第 28 天,LBA 组的血清凝血酶原片段 1+2 和 D-二聚体水平明显高于 CBA 组。两组的纤溶生物标志物(plasmin-α2 plasmin inhibitor complex)在术后均未增加。CBA和LBA的SCE发生率相当(11% vs 15%;P = .591)。结论CBA和LBA对心肌损伤、炎症反应和凝血活性的影响不同,但不影响血栓栓塞事件的发生率。LBA 在第 28 天的凝血活性明显更高,可能需要比 CBA 更谨慎的术后抗凝治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of different energy sources on coagulation biomarkers and silent cerebral events in balloon-based ablation for atrial fibrillation

Background

Different energy sources of balloon-based ablation for pulmonary vein isolation cause different kinds of endothelial damage and coagulation responses associated with thromboembolic risk.

Objectives

The study sought to compare the impact of different balloon-based ablation, cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and laser balloon ablation (LBA), on coagulation/fibrinolysis biomarkers and silent cerebral events (SCEs) in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Methods

Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients who underwent pulmonary vein isolation using either CBA (n = 52) or LBA (n = 53) without radiofrequency touch-up ablation were eligible. Time course (day 0 [before ablation], day 1, day 2, and day 28) of myocardial enzymes and inflammatory and coagulation/fibrinolysis biomarkers was evaluated during the perioperative period. Brain magnetic resonance imaging was performed within 2 days after the procedure to evaluate SCEs.

Results

There was no difference in patient characteristics between CBA and LBA.CBA had greater myocardial injury (troponin I and creatine kinase-MB) and lower inflammatory reaction (white blood cell count and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio) than LBA. The coagulation biomarkers maximally increased by day 2 and then decreased in both groups. In day 28, the serum prothrombin fragment 1+2 and D-dimer levels in LBA were significantly higher than the values in CBA. The fibrinolysis biomarker (plasmin-α2 plasmin inhibitor complex) did not increase after the procedure in either group. The incidence of SCEs was comparable between CBA and LBA (11% vs 15%; P = .591). No thromboembolic event was observed.

Conclusion

CBA and LBA had different effects on myocardial injury, inflammatory reaction, and coagulation activity but did not affect the incidence of thromboembolic events. LBA had significantly higher coagulation activity in day 28 and may require more careful postprocedural anticoagulation than CBA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart Rhythm O2
Heart Rhythm O2 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Global voices on atrial fibrillation: South/Southeast Asia Global voices on atrial fibrillation management: Brazil Ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall reduced atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence during catheter ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis The global burden of atrial fibrillation: Voices from Asia and Brazil Ventricular stimulation in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 may not predict future ventricular arrhythmias
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1