Zhangfan Shen, Tiantian Chen, Yi Wang, Moke Li, Jiaxiang Chen, Zhanpeng Hu
{"title":"天马行空还是平面化?图标风格对视觉搜索和识别性能的影响","authors":"Zhangfan Shen, Tiantian Chen, Yi Wang, Moke Li, Jiaxiang Chen, Zhanpeng Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.displa.2024.102813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although there have been many previous studies on icon visual search and recognition performance, only a few have considered the effects of both the internal and external characteristics of icons. In this behavioral study, we employed a visual search task and a semantic recognition task to explore the effects of icon style, semantic distance (SD), and task difficulty on users’ performance in perceiving and identifying icons. First, we created and filtered 64 new icons, which were divided into four different groups (flat design & close SD, flat design & far SD, skeuomorphic design & close SD, skeuomorphic design & far SD) through expert evaluation. A total of 40 participants (13 men and 27 women, ages ranging from 19 to 25 years, mean age = 21.9 years, SD=1.93) were asked to perform an icon visual search task and an icon recognition task after a round of learning. Participants’ accuracy and response time were measured as a function of the following independent variables: two icon styles (flat or skeuomorphic style), two levels of SD (close or far), and two levels of task difficulty (easy or difficult). The results showed that flat icons had better visual search performance than skeuomorphic icons; this beneficial effect increased as the task difficulty increased. However, in the icon recognition task, participants’ performance in recalling skeuomorphic icons was significantly better than that in recalling flat icons. Furthermore, a strong interaction effect between icon style and task difficulty was observed for response time. As the task difficulty decreased, the difference in recognition performance between these two different icon styles increased significantly. These findings provide valuable guidance for the design of icons in human–computer interaction interfaces.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50570,"journal":{"name":"Displays","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 102813"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Skeuomorphic or flat? The effects of icon style on visual search and recognition performance\",\"authors\":\"Zhangfan Shen, Tiantian Chen, Yi Wang, Moke Li, Jiaxiang Chen, Zhanpeng Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.displa.2024.102813\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Although there have been many previous studies on icon visual search and recognition performance, only a few have considered the effects of both the internal and external characteristics of icons. In this behavioral study, we employed a visual search task and a semantic recognition task to explore the effects of icon style, semantic distance (SD), and task difficulty on users’ performance in perceiving and identifying icons. First, we created and filtered 64 new icons, which were divided into four different groups (flat design & close SD, flat design & far SD, skeuomorphic design & close SD, skeuomorphic design & far SD) through expert evaluation. A total of 40 participants (13 men and 27 women, ages ranging from 19 to 25 years, mean age = 21.9 years, SD=1.93) were asked to perform an icon visual search task and an icon recognition task after a round of learning. Participants’ accuracy and response time were measured as a function of the following independent variables: two icon styles (flat or skeuomorphic style), two levels of SD (close or far), and two levels of task difficulty (easy or difficult). The results showed that flat icons had better visual search performance than skeuomorphic icons; this beneficial effect increased as the task difficulty increased. However, in the icon recognition task, participants’ performance in recalling skeuomorphic icons was significantly better than that in recalling flat icons. Furthermore, a strong interaction effect between icon style and task difficulty was observed for response time. As the task difficulty decreased, the difference in recognition performance between these two different icon styles increased significantly. These findings provide valuable guidance for the design of icons in human–computer interaction interfaces.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Displays\",\"volume\":\"84 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102813\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Displays\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014193822400177X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Displays","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014193822400177X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
尽管以前有很多关于图标视觉搜索和识别性能的研究,但只有少数研究考虑了图标内部和外部特征的影响。在这项行为研究中,我们采用了视觉搜索任务和语义识别任务来探讨图标风格、语义距离(SD)和任务难度对用户感知和识别图标表现的影响。首先,我们创建并筛选了64个新图标,并通过专家评估将其分为四组(扁平设计& close SD、扁平设计& far SD、skeuomorphic design & close SD、skeuomorphic design & far SD)。共有 40 名参与者(13 名男性和 27 名女性,年龄在 19 至 25 岁之间,平均年龄 = 21.9 岁,SD=1.93)被要求在一轮学习后完成图标视觉搜索任务和图标识别任务。参与者的准确率和反应时间是由以下自变量决定的:两种图标风格(扁平或偏斜风格)、两种标距水平(近或远)和两种任务难度(易或难)。结果表明,扁平图标的视觉搜索性能优于斜体图标;随着任务难度的增加,这种有利影响也在增加。然而,在图标识别任务中,参与者回忆斜体图标的表现明显优于回忆扁平图标的表现。此外,在反应时间方面,图标风格与任务难度之间存在强烈的交互效应。随着任务难度的降低,这两种不同图标风格之间的识别成绩差异明显增大。这些发现为人机交互界面中的图标设计提供了宝贵的指导。
Skeuomorphic or flat? The effects of icon style on visual search and recognition performance
Although there have been many previous studies on icon visual search and recognition performance, only a few have considered the effects of both the internal and external characteristics of icons. In this behavioral study, we employed a visual search task and a semantic recognition task to explore the effects of icon style, semantic distance (SD), and task difficulty on users’ performance in perceiving and identifying icons. First, we created and filtered 64 new icons, which were divided into four different groups (flat design & close SD, flat design & far SD, skeuomorphic design & close SD, skeuomorphic design & far SD) through expert evaluation. A total of 40 participants (13 men and 27 women, ages ranging from 19 to 25 years, mean age = 21.9 years, SD=1.93) were asked to perform an icon visual search task and an icon recognition task after a round of learning. Participants’ accuracy and response time were measured as a function of the following independent variables: two icon styles (flat or skeuomorphic style), two levels of SD (close or far), and two levels of task difficulty (easy or difficult). The results showed that flat icons had better visual search performance than skeuomorphic icons; this beneficial effect increased as the task difficulty increased. However, in the icon recognition task, participants’ performance in recalling skeuomorphic icons was significantly better than that in recalling flat icons. Furthermore, a strong interaction effect between icon style and task difficulty was observed for response time. As the task difficulty decreased, the difference in recognition performance between these two different icon styles increased significantly. These findings provide valuable guidance for the design of icons in human–computer interaction interfaces.
期刊介绍:
Displays is the international journal covering the research and development of display technology, its effective presentation and perception of information, and applications and systems including display-human interface.
Technical papers on practical developments in Displays technology provide an effective channel to promote greater understanding and cross-fertilization across the diverse disciplines of the Displays community. Original research papers solving ergonomics issues at the display-human interface advance effective presentation of information. Tutorial papers covering fundamentals intended for display technologies and human factor engineers new to the field will also occasionally featured.