2024 年,盆腔器官脱垂和压力性尿失禁手术治疗材料的发展情况如何?

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Current Opinion in Urology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1097/MOU.0000000000001217
Christopher R Chapple, Anthony J Bullock, Sheila MacNeil
{"title":"2024 年,盆腔器官脱垂和压力性尿失禁手术治疗材料的发展情况如何?","authors":"Christopher R Chapple, Anthony J Bullock, Sheila MacNeil","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>There is a long history of implantation of absorbable and nonabsorbable materials to treat stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The focus of this review is to review the development of new materials for use in the surgical management of both pelvic conditions following an unacceptable level of severe complications in the use of polypropylene mesh (PPM). We discuss current concepts relating to the development of new materials with particular reference to our experience with polyurethane mesh.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Our review highlights the strategies that manufacturers and researchers are employing to improve PPM using collagen gels and stem cells, or to find alternatives. We conclude that current preclinical safety testing is inadequate, and the field requires better in vivo testing. Specifically, we highlight novel techniques demonstrating the degradation of polypropylene potentially elucidating the link between PPM degradation and induction of inflammation leading to adverse side effects.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This field badly needs innovation in developing new materials and in testing these to ensure materials will benefit patients. A collaboration between materials scientists and clinicians is needed to facilitate the translation of basic research and preclinical testing into patient benefit for the treatment of SUI and POP.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"433-437"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where are we in 2024 in the development of materials for surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence?\",\"authors\":\"Christopher R Chapple, Anthony J Bullock, Sheila MacNeil\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>There is a long history of implantation of absorbable and nonabsorbable materials to treat stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The focus of this review is to review the development of new materials for use in the surgical management of both pelvic conditions following an unacceptable level of severe complications in the use of polypropylene mesh (PPM). We discuss current concepts relating to the development of new materials with particular reference to our experience with polyurethane mesh.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Our review highlights the strategies that manufacturers and researchers are employing to improve PPM using collagen gels and stem cells, or to find alternatives. We conclude that current preclinical safety testing is inadequate, and the field requires better in vivo testing. Specifically, we highlight novel techniques demonstrating the degradation of polypropylene potentially elucidating the link between PPM degradation and induction of inflammation leading to adverse side effects.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This field badly needs innovation in developing new materials and in testing these to ensure materials will benefit patients. A collaboration between materials scientists and clinicians is needed to facilitate the translation of basic research and preclinical testing into patient benefit for the treatment of SUI and POP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"433-437\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001217\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001217","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

审查目的:植入可吸收和不可吸收材料治疗压力性尿失禁 (SUI) 和盆腔器官脱垂 (POP) 的历史悠久。本综述的重点是回顾在使用聚丙烯网片 (PPM) 出现不可接受的严重并发症后,用于手术治疗这两种盆腔疾病的新材料的发展情况。我们讨论了当前与开发新材料有关的概念,并特别提到了我们在聚氨酯网方面的经验:我们的综述重点介绍了制造商和研究人员为利用胶原凝胶和干细胞改进聚丙烯网或寻找替代品而采取的策略。我们的结论是,目前的临床前安全性测试还不够充分,该领域需要更好的体内测试。具体而言,我们重点介绍了展示聚丙烯降解的新技术,这些技术有可能阐明 PPM 降解与诱发炎症导致不良副作用之间的联系。材料科学家和临床医生之间需要开展合作,以促进将基础研究和临床前测试转化为治疗 SUI 和 POP 的患者福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Where are we in 2024 in the development of materials for surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence?

Purpose of review: There is a long history of implantation of absorbable and nonabsorbable materials to treat stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The focus of this review is to review the development of new materials for use in the surgical management of both pelvic conditions following an unacceptable level of severe complications in the use of polypropylene mesh (PPM). We discuss current concepts relating to the development of new materials with particular reference to our experience with polyurethane mesh.

Recent findings: Our review highlights the strategies that manufacturers and researchers are employing to improve PPM using collagen gels and stem cells, or to find alternatives. We conclude that current preclinical safety testing is inadequate, and the field requires better in vivo testing. Specifically, we highlight novel techniques demonstrating the degradation of polypropylene potentially elucidating the link between PPM degradation and induction of inflammation leading to adverse side effects.

Summary: This field badly needs innovation in developing new materials and in testing these to ensure materials will benefit patients. A collaboration between materials scientists and clinicians is needed to facilitate the translation of basic research and preclinical testing into patient benefit for the treatment of SUI and POP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Urology
Current Opinion in Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Urology delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in urology from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring ten key topics – including focuses on prostate cancer, bladder cancer and minimally invasive urology – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
期刊最新文献
Medical therapy for male infertility. A narrative review on the performance and outcomes of penile and scrotal surgery in the ambulatory setting. The role of MRI in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: an update from the last two years. Prostatectomy and other local treatments for oligometastatic prostate cancer: recent and ongoing trials. The changing landscape of nonobstructive azoospermia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1