Christopher R Chapple, Anthony J Bullock, Sheila MacNeil
{"title":"2024 年,盆腔器官脱垂和压力性尿失禁手术治疗材料的发展情况如何?","authors":"Christopher R Chapple, Anthony J Bullock, Sheila MacNeil","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>There is a long history of implantation of absorbable and nonabsorbable materials to treat stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The focus of this review is to review the development of new materials for use in the surgical management of both pelvic conditions following an unacceptable level of severe complications in the use of polypropylene mesh (PPM). We discuss current concepts relating to the development of new materials with particular reference to our experience with polyurethane mesh.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Our review highlights the strategies that manufacturers and researchers are employing to improve PPM using collagen gels and stem cells, or to find alternatives. We conclude that current preclinical safety testing is inadequate, and the field requires better in vivo testing. Specifically, we highlight novel techniques demonstrating the degradation of polypropylene potentially elucidating the link between PPM degradation and induction of inflammation leading to adverse side effects.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This field badly needs innovation in developing new materials and in testing these to ensure materials will benefit patients. A collaboration between materials scientists and clinicians is needed to facilitate the translation of basic research and preclinical testing into patient benefit for the treatment of SUI and POP.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"433-437"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where are we in 2024 in the development of materials for surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence?\",\"authors\":\"Christopher R Chapple, Anthony J Bullock, Sheila MacNeil\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>There is a long history of implantation of absorbable and nonabsorbable materials to treat stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The focus of this review is to review the development of new materials for use in the surgical management of both pelvic conditions following an unacceptable level of severe complications in the use of polypropylene mesh (PPM). We discuss current concepts relating to the development of new materials with particular reference to our experience with polyurethane mesh.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Our review highlights the strategies that manufacturers and researchers are employing to improve PPM using collagen gels and stem cells, or to find alternatives. We conclude that current preclinical safety testing is inadequate, and the field requires better in vivo testing. Specifically, we highlight novel techniques demonstrating the degradation of polypropylene potentially elucidating the link between PPM degradation and induction of inflammation leading to adverse side effects.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This field badly needs innovation in developing new materials and in testing these to ensure materials will benefit patients. A collaboration between materials scientists and clinicians is needed to facilitate the translation of basic research and preclinical testing into patient benefit for the treatment of SUI and POP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"433-437\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001217\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001217","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
审查目的:植入可吸收和不可吸收材料治疗压力性尿失禁 (SUI) 和盆腔器官脱垂 (POP) 的历史悠久。本综述的重点是回顾在使用聚丙烯网片 (PPM) 出现不可接受的严重并发症后,用于手术治疗这两种盆腔疾病的新材料的发展情况。我们讨论了当前与开发新材料有关的概念,并特别提到了我们在聚氨酯网方面的经验:我们的综述重点介绍了制造商和研究人员为利用胶原凝胶和干细胞改进聚丙烯网或寻找替代品而采取的策略。我们的结论是,目前的临床前安全性测试还不够充分,该领域需要更好的体内测试。具体而言,我们重点介绍了展示聚丙烯降解的新技术,这些技术有可能阐明 PPM 降解与诱发炎症导致不良副作用之间的联系。材料科学家和临床医生之间需要开展合作,以促进将基础研究和临床前测试转化为治疗 SUI 和 POP 的患者福利。
Where are we in 2024 in the development of materials for surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence?
Purpose of review: There is a long history of implantation of absorbable and nonabsorbable materials to treat stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The focus of this review is to review the development of new materials for use in the surgical management of both pelvic conditions following an unacceptable level of severe complications in the use of polypropylene mesh (PPM). We discuss current concepts relating to the development of new materials with particular reference to our experience with polyurethane mesh.
Recent findings: Our review highlights the strategies that manufacturers and researchers are employing to improve PPM using collagen gels and stem cells, or to find alternatives. We conclude that current preclinical safety testing is inadequate, and the field requires better in vivo testing. Specifically, we highlight novel techniques demonstrating the degradation of polypropylene potentially elucidating the link between PPM degradation and induction of inflammation leading to adverse side effects.
Summary: This field badly needs innovation in developing new materials and in testing these to ensure materials will benefit patients. A collaboration between materials scientists and clinicians is needed to facilitate the translation of basic research and preclinical testing into patient benefit for the treatment of SUI and POP.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Urology delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in urology from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring ten key topics – including focuses on prostate cancer, bladder cancer and minimally invasive urology – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.