Michail Arvanitidis, Deborah Falla, Andy Sanderson, Eduardo Martinez-Valdes
{"title":"疼痛会影响肌肉力量的控制吗?系统回顾与荟萃分析。","authors":"Michail Arvanitidis, Deborah Falla, Andy Sanderson, Eduardo Martinez-Valdes","doi":"10.1002/ejp.4716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>In the presence of pain, whether clinical or experimentally induced, individuals commonly show impairments in the control of muscle force (commonly known as force steadiness). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we synthesized the available evidence on the influence of clinical and experimental pain on force steadiness.</p><p><strong>Databases and data treatment: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL Plus and Web of Science databases were searched from their inception to 19 December 2023, using MeSH terms and pre-selected keywords related to pain and force steadiness. Two independent reviewers screened studies for inclusion and assessed their methodological quality using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa risk of bias tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 32 studies (19 clinical pain and 13 experimental pain) were included. Meta-analyses revealed reduced force steadiness in the presence of clinical pain as measured by the coefficient of variation (CoV) and standard deviation (SD) of force (standardized mean difference; SMD = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.31-1.28 and SMD = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.11-1.11). These findings were supported by moderate and low strength of evidence respectively. In the presence of experimental pain, meta-analyses revealed reductions in force steadiness when measured by the CoV of force but not by the SD of force (SMD = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.01-0.99; and SMD = 0.44, 95% CI = -0.04 to 0.92), each supported by very low strength of evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work demonstrates that pain, particularly clinical pain, impairs force steadiness. Such impairments likely have clinical relevance and could become targets for treatment when managing people experiencing musculoskeletal pain.</p><p><strong>Significance statement: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analyses enhances our understanding of motor impairments observed in people experiencing musculoskeletal pain. It underscores the significance of incorporating force steadiness assessment when managing individuals experiencing musculoskeletal pain. Additionally, it suggests that future research should explore the potential benefits of force steadiness training in alleviating patients' symptoms and enhancing their functional performance. This could potentially lead to the development of innovative therapeutic approaches for individuals suffering from musculoskeletal pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does pain influence control of muscle force? A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Michail Arvanitidis, Deborah Falla, Andy Sanderson, Eduardo Martinez-Valdes\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejp.4716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>In the presence of pain, whether clinical or experimentally induced, individuals commonly show impairments in the control of muscle force (commonly known as force steadiness). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we synthesized the available evidence on the influence of clinical and experimental pain on force steadiness.</p><p><strong>Databases and data treatment: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL Plus and Web of Science databases were searched from their inception to 19 December 2023, using MeSH terms and pre-selected keywords related to pain and force steadiness. Two independent reviewers screened studies for inclusion and assessed their methodological quality using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa risk of bias tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 32 studies (19 clinical pain and 13 experimental pain) were included. Meta-analyses revealed reduced force steadiness in the presence of clinical pain as measured by the coefficient of variation (CoV) and standard deviation (SD) of force (standardized mean difference; SMD = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.31-1.28 and SMD = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.11-1.11). These findings were supported by moderate and low strength of evidence respectively. In the presence of experimental pain, meta-analyses revealed reductions in force steadiness when measured by the CoV of force but not by the SD of force (SMD = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.01-0.99; and SMD = 0.44, 95% CI = -0.04 to 0.92), each supported by very low strength of evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work demonstrates that pain, particularly clinical pain, impairs force steadiness. Such impairments likely have clinical relevance and could become targets for treatment when managing people experiencing musculoskeletal pain.</p><p><strong>Significance statement: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analyses enhances our understanding of motor impairments observed in people experiencing musculoskeletal pain. It underscores the significance of incorporating force steadiness assessment when managing individuals experiencing musculoskeletal pain. Additionally, it suggests that future research should explore the potential benefits of force steadiness training in alleviating patients' symptoms and enhancing their functional performance. This could potentially lead to the development of innovative therapeutic approaches for individuals suffering from musculoskeletal pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.4716\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.4716","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:无论是临床疼痛还是实验性疼痛,患者在控制肌肉力量(俗称力量稳定性)时通常会出现障碍。在这篇系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们综合了临床和实验性疼痛对肌力稳定性影响的现有证据:我们使用与疼痛和用力稳定性相关的 MeSH 术语和预选关键词检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、PubMed、CINAHL Plus 和 Web of Science 数据库,检索期从开始到 2023 年 12 月 19 日。两位独立审稿人对纳入的研究进行了筛选,并使用修改后的纽卡斯尔-渥太华偏倚风险工具对研究的方法学质量进行了评估:共纳入 32 项研究(19 项临床疼痛研究和 13 项实验疼痛研究)。元分析表明,临床疼痛会降低力量稳定性,以力量的变异系数(CoV)和标准差(SD)来衡量(标准化平均差;SMD = 0.80,95% CI = 0.31-1.28 和 SMD = 0.61,95% CI = 0.11-1.11)。这些结果分别得到中度和低度证据支持。在存在实验性疼痛的情况下,荟萃分析表明,以力的CoV而非力的SD来衡量时,力的稳定性会降低(SMD = 0.50,95% CI = 0.01-0.99;SMD = 0.44,95% CI = -0.04-0.92),这两项结果均得到了极低证据强度的支持:这项研究表明,疼痛,尤其是临床疼痛,会影响用力的稳定性。这种损伤可能具有临床意义,可以成为肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的治疗目标:本系统综述和荟萃分析加深了我们对肌肉骨骼疼痛患者运动障碍的了解。它强调了在管理肌肉骨骼疼痛患者时纳入力量稳定性评估的重要性。此外,它还建议未来的研究应探索力稳定性训练在缓解患者症状和提高其功能表现方面的潜在益处。这有可能为肌肉骨骼疼痛患者开发出创新的治疗方法。
Does pain influence control of muscle force? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background and objective: In the presence of pain, whether clinical or experimentally induced, individuals commonly show impairments in the control of muscle force (commonly known as force steadiness). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we synthesized the available evidence on the influence of clinical and experimental pain on force steadiness.
Databases and data treatment: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL Plus and Web of Science databases were searched from their inception to 19 December 2023, using MeSH terms and pre-selected keywords related to pain and force steadiness. Two independent reviewers screened studies for inclusion and assessed their methodological quality using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa risk of bias tool.
Results: In total, 32 studies (19 clinical pain and 13 experimental pain) were included. Meta-analyses revealed reduced force steadiness in the presence of clinical pain as measured by the coefficient of variation (CoV) and standard deviation (SD) of force (standardized mean difference; SMD = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.31-1.28 and SMD = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.11-1.11). These findings were supported by moderate and low strength of evidence respectively. In the presence of experimental pain, meta-analyses revealed reductions in force steadiness when measured by the CoV of force but not by the SD of force (SMD = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.01-0.99; and SMD = 0.44, 95% CI = -0.04 to 0.92), each supported by very low strength of evidence.
Conclusions: This work demonstrates that pain, particularly clinical pain, impairs force steadiness. Such impairments likely have clinical relevance and could become targets for treatment when managing people experiencing musculoskeletal pain.
Significance statement: This systematic review and meta-analyses enhances our understanding of motor impairments observed in people experiencing musculoskeletal pain. It underscores the significance of incorporating force steadiness assessment when managing individuals experiencing musculoskeletal pain. Additionally, it suggests that future research should explore the potential benefits of force steadiness training in alleviating patients' symptoms and enhancing their functional performance. This could potentially lead to the development of innovative therapeutic approaches for individuals suffering from musculoskeletal pain.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Pain (EJP) publishes clinical and basic science research papers relevant to all aspects of pain and its management, including specialties such as anaesthesia, dentistry, neurology and neurosurgery, orthopaedics, palliative care, pharmacology, physiology, psychiatry, psychology and rehabilitation; socio-economic aspects of pain are also covered.
Regular sections in the journal are as follows:
• Editorials and Commentaries
• Position Papers and Guidelines
• Reviews
• Original Articles
• Letters
• Bookshelf
The journal particularly welcomes clinical trials, which are published on an occasional basis.
Research articles are published under the following subject headings:
• Neurobiology
• Neurology
• Experimental Pharmacology
• Clinical Pharmacology
• Psychology
• Behavioural Therapy
• Epidemiology
• Cancer Pain
• Acute Pain
• Clinical Trials.