Myobolica:一种估算生理肌肉控制变异性的随机方法。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3447791
Alex Bersani;Mercy Amankwah;Daniela Calvetti;Erkki Somersalo;Marco Viceconti;Giorgio Davico
{"title":"Myobolica:一种估算生理肌肉控制变异性的随机方法。","authors":"Alex Bersani;Mercy Amankwah;Daniela Calvetti;Erkki Somersalo;Marco Viceconti;Giorgio Davico","doi":"10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3447791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The inherent redundancy of the musculoskeletal systems is traditionally solved by optimizing a cost function. This approach may not be correct to model non-adult or pathological populations likely to adopt a “non-optimal” motor control strategy. Over the years, various methods have been developed to address this limitation, such as the stochastic approach. A well-known implementation of this approach, Metabolica, samples a wide number of plausible solutions instead of searching for a single one, leveraging Bayesian statistics and Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm, yet allowing muscles to abruptly change their activation levels. To overcome this and other limitations, we developed a new implementation of the stochastic approach (Myobolica), adding constraints and parameters to ensure the identification of physiological solutions. The aim of this study was to evaluate Myobolica, and quantify the differences in terms of width of the solution band (muscle control variability) compared to Metabolica. To this end, both muscle forces and knee joint force solutions bands estimated by the two approaches were compared to one another, and against (i) the solution identified by static optimization and (ii) experimentally measured knee joint forces. The use of Myobolica led to a marked narrowing of the solution band compared to Metabolica. Furthermore, the Myobolica solutions well correlated with the experimental data (R\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$^{{2}} = 0.92$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n, RMSE = 0.3 BW), but not as much with the optimal solution (R\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$^{{2}} = 0.82$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n, RMSE = 0.63 BW). Additional analyses are required to confirm the findings and further improve this implementation.","PeriodicalId":13419,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering","volume":"32 ","pages":"3270-3277"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10643582","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Myobolica: A Stochastic Approach to Estimate Physiological Muscle Control Variability\",\"authors\":\"Alex Bersani;Mercy Amankwah;Daniela Calvetti;Erkki Somersalo;Marco Viceconti;Giorgio Davico\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3447791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The inherent redundancy of the musculoskeletal systems is traditionally solved by optimizing a cost function. This approach may not be correct to model non-adult or pathological populations likely to adopt a “non-optimal” motor control strategy. Over the years, various methods have been developed to address this limitation, such as the stochastic approach. A well-known implementation of this approach, Metabolica, samples a wide number of plausible solutions instead of searching for a single one, leveraging Bayesian statistics and Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm, yet allowing muscles to abruptly change their activation levels. To overcome this and other limitations, we developed a new implementation of the stochastic approach (Myobolica), adding constraints and parameters to ensure the identification of physiological solutions. The aim of this study was to evaluate Myobolica, and quantify the differences in terms of width of the solution band (muscle control variability) compared to Metabolica. To this end, both muscle forces and knee joint force solutions bands estimated by the two approaches were compared to one another, and against (i) the solution identified by static optimization and (ii) experimentally measured knee joint forces. The use of Myobolica led to a marked narrowing of the solution band compared to Metabolica. Furthermore, the Myobolica solutions well correlated with the experimental data (R\\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$^{{2}} = 0.92$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n, RMSE = 0.3 BW), but not as much with the optimal solution (R\\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$^{{2}} = 0.82$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n, RMSE = 0.63 BW). Additional analyses are required to confirm the findings and further improve this implementation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering\",\"volume\":\"32 \",\"pages\":\"3270-3277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10643582\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10643582/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10643582/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肌肉骨骼系统固有的冗余性传统上是通过优化成本函数来解决的。这种方法对于可能采用 "非最佳 "运动控制策略的非成人或病理人群建模可能并不正确。多年来,人们开发了各种方法来解决这一局限性,例如随机方法。这种方法的一个著名实施方案是 Metabolica,它利用贝叶斯统计和马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗算法,对大量似是而非的解决方案进行采样,而不是寻找单一的解决方案,但允许肌肉突然改变其激活水平。为了克服这一局限性和其他局限性,我们开发了随机方法的新实施方案(Myobolica),增加了约束条件和参数,以确保识别生理解决方案。本研究的目的是评估 Myobolica,并量化与 Metabolica 相比在解决方案带宽(肌肉控制变异性)方面的差异。为此,将两种方法估算出的肌肉力和膝关节力解决方案带进行了比较,并与(i) 静态优化确定的解决方案和(ii) 实验测量的膝关节力进行了比较。与 Metabolica 相比,Myobolica 的使用明显缩小了解决方案的范围。此外,Myobolica 解决方案与实验数据的相关性很好(R2 = 0.92,RMSE = 0.3 BW),但与最优解决方案的相关性较差(R2 = 0.82,RMSE = 0.63 BW)。还需要进行更多的分析,以确认研究结果并进一步改进这一实施方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Myobolica: A Stochastic Approach to Estimate Physiological Muscle Control Variability
The inherent redundancy of the musculoskeletal systems is traditionally solved by optimizing a cost function. This approach may not be correct to model non-adult or pathological populations likely to adopt a “non-optimal” motor control strategy. Over the years, various methods have been developed to address this limitation, such as the stochastic approach. A well-known implementation of this approach, Metabolica, samples a wide number of plausible solutions instead of searching for a single one, leveraging Bayesian statistics and Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm, yet allowing muscles to abruptly change their activation levels. To overcome this and other limitations, we developed a new implementation of the stochastic approach (Myobolica), adding constraints and parameters to ensure the identification of physiological solutions. The aim of this study was to evaluate Myobolica, and quantify the differences in terms of width of the solution band (muscle control variability) compared to Metabolica. To this end, both muscle forces and knee joint force solutions bands estimated by the two approaches were compared to one another, and against (i) the solution identified by static optimization and (ii) experimentally measured knee joint forces. The use of Myobolica led to a marked narrowing of the solution band compared to Metabolica. Furthermore, the Myobolica solutions well correlated with the experimental data (R $^{{2}} = 0.92$ , RMSE = 0.3 BW), but not as much with the optimal solution (R $^{{2}} = 0.82$ , RMSE = 0.63 BW). Additional analyses are required to confirm the findings and further improve this implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
8.20%
发文量
479
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rehabilitative and neural aspects of biomedical engineering, including functional electrical stimulation, acoustic dynamics, human performance measurement and analysis, nerve stimulation, electromyography, motor control and stimulation; and hardware and software applications for rehabilitation engineering and assistive devices.
期刊最新文献
Semi-Autonomous Continuous Robotic Arm Control Using an Augmented Reality Brain-Computer Interface Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Stimulation on Fingertip Can Evoke Fine Tactile Sensations and Different Local Hemodynamic Responses The Neural Basis of the Effect of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Emotion Regulation Related Brain Regions: An rs-fMRI Study An Asynchronous Training-free SSVEP-BCI Detection Algorithm for Non-Equal Prior Probability Scenarios. A Swing-Assist Controller for Enhancing Knee Flexion in a Semi-Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1