免疫检查点抑制剂临床试验中少数种族和族裔群体的代表性不足和报告不足。

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JCO oncology practice Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1200/OP.24.00033
Alfredo V Chua, Jennifer Delmerico, Haiyang Sheng, Xin-Wei Huang, Emily Liang, Li Yan, Shipra Gandhi, Igor Puzanov, Prantesh Jain, Lori C Sakoda, Gary R Morrow, Christine B Ambrosone, Charles Kamen, Song Yao
{"title":"免疫检查点抑制剂临床试验中少数种族和族裔群体的代表性不足和报告不足。","authors":"Alfredo V Chua, Jennifer Delmerico, Haiyang Sheng, Xin-Wei Huang, Emily Liang, Li Yan, Shipra Gandhi, Igor Puzanov, Prantesh Jain, Lori C Sakoda, Gary R Morrow, Christine B Ambrosone, Charles Kamen, Song Yao","doi":"10.1200/OP.24.00033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Minoritized racial/ethnic groups are historically under-represented in cancer clinical trials, which may be exacerbated in recent trials on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We examined the representation and reporting of the racial/ethnic composition of participants in clinical trials on ICIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined English full-text trials on ICIs published from 2007 to 2022. Information on trial characteristics and racial/ethnic composition of participants was extracted from published papers or ClinicalTrials.gov. Differences in participation by publication year, ICI agent, and cancer site were analyzed. Enrollment-incidence ratio (EIR) was calculated to compare the proportion of minoritized racial/ethnic group patients in US-based trials against age-adjusted cancer incidence data available for the US population. An EIR > 1 signified over-representation, whereas an EIR <1 signified under-representation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 471 trials examined, racial composition was unreported in 146 (31%), whereas Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity was unreported in 278 (59%). Only 30 (6%) trials reported race/ethnicity-specific results. In US-only trials (n = 174), White patients were over-represented (EIR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.17 to 1.22]), whereas Hispanic/Latinx patients were the most under-represented (EIR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.24 to 0.48]), followed by Black/African American patients (EIR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.79]). Subgroup analyses consistently indicated over-representation of White patients across publication years (EIR, 1.19-1.24), ICI classes (EIR, 1.16-1.23), and cancer sites (EIR, 1.11-1.31), whereas Hispanic/Latinx patients were consistently under-represented. An upward trend of trial representation and reporting was observed for all minoritized racial/ethnic groups over time (trend <i>P</i> values ≤.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Disparities in the representation and reporting of minoritized racial/ethnic groups persist in recent trials on ICIs, necessitating collaborative efforts for improved diversity and equitable cancer treatment access.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Under-Representation and Under-Reporting of Minoritized Racial and Ethnic Groups in Clinical Trials on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.\",\"authors\":\"Alfredo V Chua, Jennifer Delmerico, Haiyang Sheng, Xin-Wei Huang, Emily Liang, Li Yan, Shipra Gandhi, Igor Puzanov, Prantesh Jain, Lori C Sakoda, Gary R Morrow, Christine B Ambrosone, Charles Kamen, Song Yao\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/OP.24.00033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Minoritized racial/ethnic groups are historically under-represented in cancer clinical trials, which may be exacerbated in recent trials on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We examined the representation and reporting of the racial/ethnic composition of participants in clinical trials on ICIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined English full-text trials on ICIs published from 2007 to 2022. Information on trial characteristics and racial/ethnic composition of participants was extracted from published papers or ClinicalTrials.gov. Differences in participation by publication year, ICI agent, and cancer site were analyzed. Enrollment-incidence ratio (EIR) was calculated to compare the proportion of minoritized racial/ethnic group patients in US-based trials against age-adjusted cancer incidence data available for the US population. An EIR > 1 signified over-representation, whereas an EIR <1 signified under-representation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 471 trials examined, racial composition was unreported in 146 (31%), whereas Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity was unreported in 278 (59%). Only 30 (6%) trials reported race/ethnicity-specific results. In US-only trials (n = 174), White patients were over-represented (EIR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.17 to 1.22]), whereas Hispanic/Latinx patients were the most under-represented (EIR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.24 to 0.48]), followed by Black/African American patients (EIR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.79]). Subgroup analyses consistently indicated over-representation of White patients across publication years (EIR, 1.19-1.24), ICI classes (EIR, 1.16-1.23), and cancer sites (EIR, 1.11-1.31), whereas Hispanic/Latinx patients were consistently under-represented. An upward trend of trial representation and reporting was observed for all minoritized racial/ethnic groups over time (trend <i>P</i> values ≤.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Disparities in the representation and reporting of minoritized racial/ethnic groups persist in recent trials on ICIs, necessitating collaborative efforts for improved diversity and equitable cancer treatment access.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.24.00033\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.24.00033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:少数种族/族裔群体在癌症临床试验中的代表性历来不足,这种情况在最近的免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)试验中可能会加剧。我们研究了 ICIs 临床试验中参与者种族/民族构成的代表性和报告情况:我们研究了 2007 年至 2022 年间发表的 ICIs 英文全文试验。从发表的论文或ClinicalTrials.gov中提取了有关试验特征和参与者种族/民族构成的信息。分析了按发表年份、ICI药物和癌症部位划分的参与者差异。通过计算入组-发病率比(EIR),将美国试验中的少数种族/人种患者比例与美国人口的年龄调整后癌症发病率数据进行比较。EIR > 1 表示比例过高,EIR > 2 表示比例过低:在接受检查的 471 项试验中,146 项(31%)试验未报告种族构成,278 项(59%)试验未报告西班牙裔/拉丁裔种族构成。只有 30 项(6%)试验报告了特定种族/人种的结果。在仅针对美国的试验中(n = 174),白人患者比例过高(EIR,1.20 [95% CI,1.17 至 1.22]),而西班牙裔/拉丁裔患者比例最低(EIR,0.35 [95% CI,0.24 至 0.48]),其次是黑人/非洲裔美国人患者(EIR,0.66 [95% CI,0.54 至 0.79])。亚组分析表明,在不同的发表年份(EIR,1.19-1.24)、不同的 ICI 类别(EIR,1.16-1.23)和不同的癌症部位(EIR,1.11-1.31),白人患者的代表性始终偏高,而西班牙裔/拉丁裔患者的代表性始终偏低。随着时间的推移,所有少数种族/族裔群体的试验代表性和报告率均呈上升趋势(趋势 P 值≤.05):结论:在最近的 ICIs 试验中,少数种族/族裔群体在代表性和报告方面仍然存在差异,因此有必要通力合作,以改善多样性和公平的癌症治疗机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Under-Representation and Under-Reporting of Minoritized Racial and Ethnic Groups in Clinical Trials on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Purpose: Minoritized racial/ethnic groups are historically under-represented in cancer clinical trials, which may be exacerbated in recent trials on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We examined the representation and reporting of the racial/ethnic composition of participants in clinical trials on ICIs.

Methods: We examined English full-text trials on ICIs published from 2007 to 2022. Information on trial characteristics and racial/ethnic composition of participants was extracted from published papers or ClinicalTrials.gov. Differences in participation by publication year, ICI agent, and cancer site were analyzed. Enrollment-incidence ratio (EIR) was calculated to compare the proportion of minoritized racial/ethnic group patients in US-based trials against age-adjusted cancer incidence data available for the US population. An EIR > 1 signified over-representation, whereas an EIR <1 signified under-representation.

Results: Of the 471 trials examined, racial composition was unreported in 146 (31%), whereas Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity was unreported in 278 (59%). Only 30 (6%) trials reported race/ethnicity-specific results. In US-only trials (n = 174), White patients were over-represented (EIR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.17 to 1.22]), whereas Hispanic/Latinx patients were the most under-represented (EIR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.24 to 0.48]), followed by Black/African American patients (EIR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.79]). Subgroup analyses consistently indicated over-representation of White patients across publication years (EIR, 1.19-1.24), ICI classes (EIR, 1.16-1.23), and cancer sites (EIR, 1.11-1.31), whereas Hispanic/Latinx patients were consistently under-represented. An upward trend of trial representation and reporting was observed for all minoritized racial/ethnic groups over time (trend P values ≤.05).

Conclusion: Disparities in the representation and reporting of minoritized racial/ethnic groups persist in recent trials on ICIs, necessitating collaborative efforts for improved diversity and equitable cancer treatment access.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
期刊最新文献
Patient, Parent, and Oncologist Perspectives and Recommendations on the Right Way to Talk About Prognosis in Advanced Childhood Cancer. Management of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: ASCO Guideline Clinical Insights. "Rehabbed to Death" in Oncology: Where Do We Go From Here? Impact of an Etoposide Chemotherapy Shortage on Patients With Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of a Natural Experiment. Association of Community-Level Social Vulnerability With Clinical Trial Discussion and Participation Among Cancer Survivors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1