比较辅助生殖技术和自然受孕的妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症妇女的风险因素和新生儿结局。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1002/ijgo.15878
Jingwei Yang, Jing Gao, Danni Zhou, Hong Ye, Guoning Huang, Xuemei Lian, Xiaodong Zhang
{"title":"比较辅助生殖技术和自然受孕的妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症妇女的风险因素和新生儿结局。","authors":"Jingwei Yang, Jing Gao, Danni Zhou, Hong Ye, Guoning Huang, Xuemei Lian, Xiaodong Zhang","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the present study was to investigate the incidence of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) as well as neonatal outcomes between conception via in vitro fertilization (IVF) compared with spontaneous conception (SC) and screen the risk factors of ICP in IVF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 4467 puerperae who conceived via IVF, and 28 336 puerperae who conceived spontaneously and linked the information from neonates. The general linear model (GLM), multivariate logistic regression analysis, a forest plot, and nomogram were used to assess impact factors and risk prediction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Logistic analysis adjusted for confounders revealed significant differences in the ICP rate of singleton delivery (4.24% vs 3.41%, adjusted OR [aOR] = 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.53, P = 0.025) and in groups with total bile acids (TBA) ≥40 and <100 μmol/L (14.77% vs 10.39%, aOR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.06-1.63, P = 0.023) between IVF and SC. When we divided newborns into singleton and twins delivery, the GLM revealed a higher rate with Apgar score <7 (13.44% vs 3.87%, aOR = 3.85; 95% CI: 2.07-7.17, P < 0.001) and fetal distress for IVF in comparison with SC (19.32% vs 5.55%, OR = 3.48; 95% CI: 2.39-6.95, P < 0.001) in the singleton group. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, body mass index (BMI) (aOR = 1.29; P = 0.031), number of embryo transfers (ET) (single ET vs double ET, aOR = 2.82; P < 0.001), E<sub>2</sub> level on the ET day (aOR = 2.79; P = 0.011), fresh ET which compared with frozen ET (FET) (aOR = 1.45; P = 0.014), embryo stage (cleavage embryo vs blastocyst, aOR = 1.75; P = 0.009) and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) which compared with non-OHSS (aOR = 3.73; P = 0.006) were independent predictors of ICP. These predictive factors in the logistic regression model were integrated into the nomogram (C-index = 0.735; 95% CI: 0.702-0.764); for each patient, higher total points indicated a higher risk of ICP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed that the ICP rate of singleton delivery was higher in IVF than in SC. In ICP patients, there were higher rates of neonatal Apgar score <7 and fetal distress in IVF than SC and found the predictors of ICP in IVF.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":"663-672"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing risk factors and neonatal outcomes in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy between assisted reproductive technology and spontaneous conception.\",\"authors\":\"Jingwei Yang, Jing Gao, Danni Zhou, Hong Ye, Guoning Huang, Xuemei Lian, Xiaodong Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijgo.15878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the present study was to investigate the incidence of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) as well as neonatal outcomes between conception via in vitro fertilization (IVF) compared with spontaneous conception (SC) and screen the risk factors of ICP in IVF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 4467 puerperae who conceived via IVF, and 28 336 puerperae who conceived spontaneously and linked the information from neonates. The general linear model (GLM), multivariate logistic regression analysis, a forest plot, and nomogram were used to assess impact factors and risk prediction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Logistic analysis adjusted for confounders revealed significant differences in the ICP rate of singleton delivery (4.24% vs 3.41%, adjusted OR [aOR] = 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.53, P = 0.025) and in groups with total bile acids (TBA) ≥40 and <100 μmol/L (14.77% vs 10.39%, aOR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.06-1.63, P = 0.023) between IVF and SC. When we divided newborns into singleton and twins delivery, the GLM revealed a higher rate with Apgar score <7 (13.44% vs 3.87%, aOR = 3.85; 95% CI: 2.07-7.17, P < 0.001) and fetal distress for IVF in comparison with SC (19.32% vs 5.55%, OR = 3.48; 95% CI: 2.39-6.95, P < 0.001) in the singleton group. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, body mass index (BMI) (aOR = 1.29; P = 0.031), number of embryo transfers (ET) (single ET vs double ET, aOR = 2.82; P < 0.001), E<sub>2</sub> level on the ET day (aOR = 2.79; P = 0.011), fresh ET which compared with frozen ET (FET) (aOR = 1.45; P = 0.014), embryo stage (cleavage embryo vs blastocyst, aOR = 1.75; P = 0.009) and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) which compared with non-OHSS (aOR = 3.73; P = 0.006) were independent predictors of ICP. These predictive factors in the logistic regression model were integrated into the nomogram (C-index = 0.735; 95% CI: 0.702-0.764); for each patient, higher total points indicated a higher risk of ICP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed that the ICP rate of singleton delivery was higher in IVF than in SC. In ICP patients, there were higher rates of neonatal Apgar score <7 and fetal distress in IVF than SC and found the predictors of ICP in IVF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"663-672\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15878\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15878","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在调查体外受精(IVF)受孕与自然受孕(SC)之间妊娠肝内胆汁淤积症(ICP)的发生率和新生儿结局,并筛选体外受精ICP的风险因素:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了4467名通过体外受精受孕的产褥期妇女和28 336名自然受孕的产褥期妇女,并将新生儿的信息联系起来。研究采用一般线性模型(GLM)、多变量逻辑回归分析、森林图和提名图来评估影响因素和风险预测:结果:经混杂因素调整的逻辑分析显示,单胎分娩的 ICP 率(4.24% vs 3.41%,调整 OR [aOR] = 1.26;95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.03-1.53,P = 0.025)与 ET 日总胆汁酸 (TBA) ≥40 和 2 水平的组别存在显著差异(aOR = 2.79;P = 0.011)、新鲜 ET 与冷冻 ET(FET)相比(aOR = 1.45;P = 0.014)、胚胎阶段(卵裂胚胎与囊胚相比,aOR = 1.75;P = 0.009)和严重卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)与非 OHSS 相比(aOR = 3.73;P = 0.006)都是 ICP 的独立预测因素。逻辑回归模型中的这些预测因素被整合到提名图中(C-指数=0.735;95% CI:0.702-0.764);对每位患者而言,总分越高,ICP 的风险越高:我们观察到,试管婴儿的单胎ICP率高于顺产。在 ICP 患者中,新生儿 Apgar 评分较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing risk factors and neonatal outcomes in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy between assisted reproductive technology and spontaneous conception.

Objective: The aim of the present study was to investigate the incidence of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) as well as neonatal outcomes between conception via in vitro fertilization (IVF) compared with spontaneous conception (SC) and screen the risk factors of ICP in IVF.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 4467 puerperae who conceived via IVF, and 28 336 puerperae who conceived spontaneously and linked the information from neonates. The general linear model (GLM), multivariate logistic regression analysis, a forest plot, and nomogram were used to assess impact factors and risk prediction.

Results: Logistic analysis adjusted for confounders revealed significant differences in the ICP rate of singleton delivery (4.24% vs 3.41%, adjusted OR [aOR] = 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.53, P = 0.025) and in groups with total bile acids (TBA) ≥40 and <100 μmol/L (14.77% vs 10.39%, aOR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.06-1.63, P = 0.023) between IVF and SC. When we divided newborns into singleton and twins delivery, the GLM revealed a higher rate with Apgar score <7 (13.44% vs 3.87%, aOR = 3.85; 95% CI: 2.07-7.17, P < 0.001) and fetal distress for IVF in comparison with SC (19.32% vs 5.55%, OR = 3.48; 95% CI: 2.39-6.95, P < 0.001) in the singleton group. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, body mass index (BMI) (aOR = 1.29; P = 0.031), number of embryo transfers (ET) (single ET vs double ET, aOR = 2.82; P < 0.001), E2 level on the ET day (aOR = 2.79; P = 0.011), fresh ET which compared with frozen ET (FET) (aOR = 1.45; P = 0.014), embryo stage (cleavage embryo vs blastocyst, aOR = 1.75; P = 0.009) and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) which compared with non-OHSS (aOR = 3.73; P = 0.006) were independent predictors of ICP. These predictive factors in the logistic regression model were integrated into the nomogram (C-index = 0.735; 95% CI: 0.702-0.764); for each patient, higher total points indicated a higher risk of ICP.

Conclusion: We observed that the ICP rate of singleton delivery was higher in IVF than in SC. In ICP patients, there were higher rates of neonatal Apgar score <7 and fetal distress in IVF than SC and found the predictors of ICP in IVF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
期刊最新文献
Birth companionship: The effect of introducing Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) intervention on improving quality of care: An implementation study. Analyzing the performance of ChatGPT in answering inquiries about cervical cancer. Laparoscopic excision of a large 25 cm adnexal mass with ovarian preservation while minimizing spillage. Aggregate index of systemic inflammation: A novel systemic inflammatory index for prediction of neonatal outcomes and chorioamnionitis in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes. De novo urethral hypermobility at 6 months after first delivery as a risk factor for stress urinary incontinence 12 years postpartum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1