前期综合疗法时代新发转移性前列腺癌患者的治疗趋势。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY International Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1111/iju.15550
Hikari Miura, Shingo Hatakeyama, Ryuji Tabata, Daiji Fujimori, Yohei Kawashima, Shingo Moriyama, Takuya Oishi, Hirotaka Horiguchi, Osamu Soma, Daisuke Noro, Toshikazu Tanaka, Teppei Okamoto, Hayato Yamamoto, Satoshi Sato, Chikara Ohyama
{"title":"前期综合疗法时代新发转移性前列腺癌患者的治疗趋势。","authors":"Hikari Miura, Shingo Hatakeyama, Ryuji Tabata, Daiji Fujimori, Yohei Kawashima, Shingo Moriyama, Takuya Oishi, Hirotaka Horiguchi, Osamu Soma, Daisuke Noro, Toshikazu Tanaka, Teppei Okamoto, Hayato Yamamoto, Satoshi Sato, Chikara Ohyama","doi":"10.1111/iju.15550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to assess the trends in treatment selection for patients with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer in the era of upfront combination therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study included 595 patients treated with either upfront combination therapy (upfront novel hormonal therapies and taxane-based chemotherapy) or vintage therapy (androgen deprivation therapy with or without bicalutamide) between 2016 and 2021. High tumor burden metastatic disease was defined when a patient met the CHAARTED or LATITUDE criteria. We evaluated trends in treatment selection and reasons for selecting vintage therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 595, 123 and 472 patients were classified as having low and high tumor-burden disease, respectively. The Use of upfront combination therapy was found to be rapidly increasing with utilization rates of 72% and 54% in 2021 for high and low tumor-burden disease, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis found older age, poor performance status, and nonacademic center were significantly associated with the selection of vintage therapy. Of the 163 patients who received vintage hormone therapy after approval of upfront therapy, 74.2% had a specific reason for avoiding upfront therapy. The reasons for selecting vintage therapy included refusal (39.8%), older age (67.6%), frailty (56.3%), and comorbidity (40.8%). Furthermore, 16.9% of patients declined upfront combination therapy due to cost concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Upfront combination therapy use has 72% and 54% prevalence among patients with high and low tumor burden diseases, respectively, in this current practice. Older age, poor performance status, and facility bias were negatively associated with the use of upfront combination therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment trends in patients with de novo metastatic prostate cancer in the era of upfront combination therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Hikari Miura, Shingo Hatakeyama, Ryuji Tabata, Daiji Fujimori, Yohei Kawashima, Shingo Moriyama, Takuya Oishi, Hirotaka Horiguchi, Osamu Soma, Daisuke Noro, Toshikazu Tanaka, Teppei Okamoto, Hayato Yamamoto, Satoshi Sato, Chikara Ohyama\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/iju.15550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to assess the trends in treatment selection for patients with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer in the era of upfront combination therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study included 595 patients treated with either upfront combination therapy (upfront novel hormonal therapies and taxane-based chemotherapy) or vintage therapy (androgen deprivation therapy with or without bicalutamide) between 2016 and 2021. High tumor burden metastatic disease was defined when a patient met the CHAARTED or LATITUDE criteria. We evaluated trends in treatment selection and reasons for selecting vintage therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 595, 123 and 472 patients were classified as having low and high tumor-burden disease, respectively. The Use of upfront combination therapy was found to be rapidly increasing with utilization rates of 72% and 54% in 2021 for high and low tumor-burden disease, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis found older age, poor performance status, and nonacademic center were significantly associated with the selection of vintage therapy. Of the 163 patients who received vintage hormone therapy after approval of upfront therapy, 74.2% had a specific reason for avoiding upfront therapy. The reasons for selecting vintage therapy included refusal (39.8%), older age (67.6%), frailty (56.3%), and comorbidity (40.8%). Furthermore, 16.9% of patients declined upfront combination therapy due to cost concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Upfront combination therapy use has 72% and 54% prevalence among patients with high and low tumor burden diseases, respectively, in this current practice. Older age, poor performance status, and facility bias were negatively associated with the use of upfront combination therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.15550\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.15550","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估新发转移性阉割敏感性前列腺癌患者在前期联合疗法时代的治疗选择趋势:这项多中心回顾性研究纳入了2016年至2021年间接受前期联合疗法(前期新型激素疗法和基于类固醇的化疗)或复古疗法(使用或不使用比卡鲁胺的雄激素剥夺疗法)治疗的595名患者。当患者符合 CHAARTED 或 LATITUDE 标准时,即定义为高肿瘤负荷转移性疾病。我们评估了治疗选择的趋势以及选择复古疗法的原因:在 595 例患者中,分别有 123 例和 472 例患者被归类为低肿瘤负担和高肿瘤负担疾病。发现前期联合疗法的使用率正在迅速上升,2021 年高肿瘤负荷和低肿瘤负荷疾病的使用率分别为 72% 和 54%。多变量逻辑回归分析发现,年龄偏大、表现不佳和非学术中心与选择新疗法有显著相关性。163名患者在前期治疗获批后接受了复古激素治疗,其中74.2%的患者有避免前期治疗的具体原因。选择老式疗法的原因包括拒绝(39.8%)、年龄较大(67.6%)、体弱(56.3%)和合并症(40.8%)。此外,16.9%的患者因费用问题而拒绝前期联合治疗:结论:在目前的临床实践中,高肿瘤负荷和低肿瘤负荷患者使用前期综合疗法的比例分别为 72% 和 54%。高龄、表现不佳和设施偏差与前期综合治疗的使用呈负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treatment trends in patients with de novo metastatic prostate cancer in the era of upfront combination therapy.

Objectives: The objective of this study is to assess the trends in treatment selection for patients with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer in the era of upfront combination therapy.

Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 595 patients treated with either upfront combination therapy (upfront novel hormonal therapies and taxane-based chemotherapy) or vintage therapy (androgen deprivation therapy with or without bicalutamide) between 2016 and 2021. High tumor burden metastatic disease was defined when a patient met the CHAARTED or LATITUDE criteria. We evaluated trends in treatment selection and reasons for selecting vintage therapy.

Results: Of the 595, 123 and 472 patients were classified as having low and high tumor-burden disease, respectively. The Use of upfront combination therapy was found to be rapidly increasing with utilization rates of 72% and 54% in 2021 for high and low tumor-burden disease, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis found older age, poor performance status, and nonacademic center were significantly associated with the selection of vintage therapy. Of the 163 patients who received vintage hormone therapy after approval of upfront therapy, 74.2% had a specific reason for avoiding upfront therapy. The reasons for selecting vintage therapy included refusal (39.8%), older age (67.6%), frailty (56.3%), and comorbidity (40.8%). Furthermore, 16.9% of patients declined upfront combination therapy due to cost concerns.

Conclusion: Upfront combination therapy use has 72% and 54% prevalence among patients with high and low tumor burden diseases, respectively, in this current practice. Older age, poor performance status, and facility bias were negatively associated with the use of upfront combination therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Urology
International Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
340
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urology is the official English language journal of the Japanese Urological Association, publishing articles of scientific excellence in urology. Submissions of papers from all countries are considered for publication. All manuscripts are subject to peer review and are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation.
期刊最新文献
Comparative clinical trials with a novel approach: Utilizing the shiny method for investigational urothelial carcinoma therapies. Feasibility of approximate measurement of bladder volume in children using the Lilium α-200 portable bladder scanner. The role of lipidic balance on erectile dysfunction in prostate cancer patients undergoing robotic surgery. Efficacy and safety of dose-dense gemcitabine plus cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Preservation of the native urethral plate and corpus spongiosum combined with buccal mucosa graft plus Orandi's penile skin flap as an alternative to staged urethroplasty for narrow penile strictures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1