利用牙科图像检测骨质疏松症的人工智能模型的诊断准确性:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Osteoporosis International Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1007/s00198-024-07229-8
Gita Khadivi, Abtin Akhtari, Farshad Sharifi, Nicolette Zargarian, Saharnaz Esmaeili, Mitra Ghazizadeh Ahsaie, Soheil Shahbazi
{"title":"利用牙科图像检测骨质疏松症的人工智能模型的诊断准确性:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Gita Khadivi, Abtin Akhtari, Farshad Sharifi, Nicolette Zargarian, Saharnaz Esmaeili, Mitra Ghazizadeh Ahsaie, Soheil Shahbazi","doi":"10.1007/s00198-024-07229-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study aimed to systematically review the literature on the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) models for osteoporosis (OP) diagnosis using dental images. A thorough literature search was executed in October 2022 and updated in November 2023 across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The research targeted studies using AI models for OP diagnosis from dental radiographs. The main outcomes were the sensitivity and specificity of AI models regarding OP diagnosis. The \"meta\" package from the R Foundation was selected for statistical analysis. A random-effects model, along with 95% confidence intervals, was utilized to estimate pooled values. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool was employed for risk of bias and applicability assessment. Among 640 records, 22 studies were included in the qualitative analysis and 12 in the meta-analysis. The overall sensitivity for AI-assisted OP diagnosis was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.70-0.93), while the pooled specificity equaled 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.97). Conventional algorithms led to a pooled sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.57-0.94) and a pooled specificity of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.97). Deep convolutional neural networks exhibited a pooled sensitivity of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.68-0.95) and a pooled specificity of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.83-0.96). This systematic review corroborates the accuracy of AI in OP diagnosis using dental images. Future research should expand sample sizes in test and training datasets and standardize imaging techniques to establish the reliability of AI-assisted methods in OP diagnosis through dental images.</p>","PeriodicalId":19638,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence models in detecting osteoporosis using dental images: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Gita Khadivi, Abtin Akhtari, Farshad Sharifi, Nicolette Zargarian, Saharnaz Esmaeili, Mitra Ghazizadeh Ahsaie, Soheil Shahbazi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00198-024-07229-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The current study aimed to systematically review the literature on the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) models for osteoporosis (OP) diagnosis using dental images. A thorough literature search was executed in October 2022 and updated in November 2023 across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The research targeted studies using AI models for OP diagnosis from dental radiographs. The main outcomes were the sensitivity and specificity of AI models regarding OP diagnosis. The \\\"meta\\\" package from the R Foundation was selected for statistical analysis. A random-effects model, along with 95% confidence intervals, was utilized to estimate pooled values. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool was employed for risk of bias and applicability assessment. Among 640 records, 22 studies were included in the qualitative analysis and 12 in the meta-analysis. The overall sensitivity for AI-assisted OP diagnosis was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.70-0.93), while the pooled specificity equaled 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.97). Conventional algorithms led to a pooled sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.57-0.94) and a pooled specificity of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.97). Deep convolutional neural networks exhibited a pooled sensitivity of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.68-0.95) and a pooled specificity of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.83-0.96). This systematic review corroborates the accuracy of AI in OP diagnosis using dental images. Future research should expand sample sizes in test and training datasets and standardize imaging techniques to establish the reliability of AI-assisted methods in OP diagnosis through dental images.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osteoporosis International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osteoporosis International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-024-07229-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoporosis International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-024-07229-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在系统回顾有关利用牙科图像诊断骨质疏松症(OP)的人工智能(AI)模型准确性的文献。我们于 2022 年 10 月在多个数据库(包括 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar)中进行了全面的文献检索,并于 2023 年 11 月进行了更新。研究的目标是使用人工智能模型从牙科X光片诊断OP的研究。主要结果是人工智能模型对 OP 诊断的敏感性和特异性。研究选择了 R 基金会的 "meta "软件包进行统计分析。采用随机效应模型和 95% 置信区间来估算汇总值。采用诊断准确性研究质量评估(QUADAS-2)工具进行偏倚风险和适用性评估。在 640 份记录中,22 项研究被纳入定性分析,12 项被纳入荟萃分析。人工智能辅助 OP 诊断的总体灵敏度为 0.85(95% CI,0.70-0.93),而汇总特异度为 0.95(95% CI,0.91-0.97)。传统算法的集合灵敏度为 0.82(95% CI,0.57-0.94),集合特异度为 0.96(95% CI,0.93-0.97)。深度卷积神经网络的汇总灵敏度为 0.87(95% CI,0.68-0.95),汇总特异度为 0.92(95% CI,0.83-0.96)。本系统综述证实了人工智能在使用牙科图像诊断 OP 方面的准确性。未来的研究应扩大测试和训练数据集的样本量,并规范成像技术,以确定人工智能辅助方法通过牙科图像诊断 OP 的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence models in detecting osteoporosis using dental images: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The current study aimed to systematically review the literature on the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) models for osteoporosis (OP) diagnosis using dental images. A thorough literature search was executed in October 2022 and updated in November 2023 across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The research targeted studies using AI models for OP diagnosis from dental radiographs. The main outcomes were the sensitivity and specificity of AI models regarding OP diagnosis. The "meta" package from the R Foundation was selected for statistical analysis. A random-effects model, along with 95% confidence intervals, was utilized to estimate pooled values. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool was employed for risk of bias and applicability assessment. Among 640 records, 22 studies were included in the qualitative analysis and 12 in the meta-analysis. The overall sensitivity for AI-assisted OP diagnosis was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.70-0.93), while the pooled specificity equaled 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.97). Conventional algorithms led to a pooled sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.57-0.94) and a pooled specificity of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.97). Deep convolutional neural networks exhibited a pooled sensitivity of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.68-0.95) and a pooled specificity of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.83-0.96). This systematic review corroborates the accuracy of AI in OP diagnosis using dental images. Future research should expand sample sizes in test and training datasets and standardize imaging techniques to establish the reliability of AI-assisted methods in OP diagnosis through dental images.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Osteoporosis International
Osteoporosis International 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: An international multi-disciplinary journal which is a joint initiative between the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, Osteoporosis International provides a forum for the communication and exchange of current ideas concerning the diagnosis, prevention, treatment and management of osteoporosis and other metabolic bone diseases. It publishes: original papers - reporting progress and results in all areas of osteoporosis and its related fields; review articles - reflecting the present state of knowledge in special areas of summarizing limited themes in which discussion has led to clearly defined conclusions; educational articles - giving information on the progress of a topic of particular interest; case reports - of uncommon or interesting presentations of the condition. While focusing on clinical research, the Journal will also accept submissions on more basic aspects of research, where they are considered by the editors to be relevant to the human disease spectrum.
期刊最新文献
Cost-effectiveness intervention thresholds for romosozumab and teriparatide in the treatment of osteoporosis in the UK. The association between myasthenia gravis and risk of fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagnostic performance of radiomics for predicting osteoporosis in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Introduction of an order set after hip fracture improves osteoporosis medication initiation and persistence: a population-based before-after analysis. Sex differences in hemoglobin levels and five-year refracture risk in patients with osteoporotic fractures: a retrospective cohort analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1