Eugene E Zheng, Lauren Gates-Tanzer, Sai Cherukuri, Samir Mardini, M Hassan Murad, Uldis Bite, Waleed Gibreel
{"title":"外科医生在腭裂患者的腭瘘修复中使用何种游离皮瓣?系统回顾。","authors":"Eugene E Zheng, Lauren Gates-Tanzer, Sai Cherukuri, Samir Mardini, M Hassan Murad, Uldis Bite, Waleed Gibreel","doi":"10.1177/10556656241266243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recalcitrant palatal fistulas in patients with cleft palate history sometimes require free flap reconstruction. This study reviews the literature on described flaps and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review was conducted per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>All study designs were included. Non-English articles were excluded.</p><p><strong>Patients and participants: </strong>Patients with a history of cleft palate who underwent free flap reconstruction for a oronasal fistula.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Free tissue transfer for a palatal fistula repair.</p><p><strong>Main outcomee measures: </strong>Information regarding defect and flap characteristics were reviewed. Surgical outcomes such as flap loss rates, rates of recurrent fistula formation, and speech outcomes were also obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search returned 894 articles, of which 23 were included. All studies were retrospective case series and reports. A total of 65 patients were described with an average age of 19.3 (range 3-55) years and a median fistula size of 8.00 cm<sup>2</sup> (range 2.54 cm<sup>2</sup> - 24 cm<sup>2</sup>). The most common flap was the radial forearm flap (n = 37). Nine patients (13.8%) had recurrent fistula formation with surgical revision successful in all cases in which the patient returned to the operating room. There were two partial flap losses and no total flap losses. Speech outcomes showed improvement in 27 patients across 10 studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Palatal fistula repair with free tissue transfer is safe with an acceptable risk profile and low flap loss rate. Early recurrence due to partial flap necrosis and dehiscence are successfully managed with flap readvancement.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Free Flaps Are Surgeons Using for Palatal Fistula Repair in Patients with Cleft Palate? A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Eugene E Zheng, Lauren Gates-Tanzer, Sai Cherukuri, Samir Mardini, M Hassan Murad, Uldis Bite, Waleed Gibreel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656241266243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recalcitrant palatal fistulas in patients with cleft palate history sometimes require free flap reconstruction. This study reviews the literature on described flaps and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review was conducted per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>All study designs were included. Non-English articles were excluded.</p><p><strong>Patients and participants: </strong>Patients with a history of cleft palate who underwent free flap reconstruction for a oronasal fistula.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Free tissue transfer for a palatal fistula repair.</p><p><strong>Main outcomee measures: </strong>Information regarding defect and flap characteristics were reviewed. Surgical outcomes such as flap loss rates, rates of recurrent fistula formation, and speech outcomes were also obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search returned 894 articles, of which 23 were included. All studies were retrospective case series and reports. A total of 65 patients were described with an average age of 19.3 (range 3-55) years and a median fistula size of 8.00 cm<sup>2</sup> (range 2.54 cm<sup>2</sup> - 24 cm<sup>2</sup>). The most common flap was the radial forearm flap (n = 37). Nine patients (13.8%) had recurrent fistula formation with surgical revision successful in all cases in which the patient returned to the operating room. There were two partial flap losses and no total flap losses. Speech outcomes showed improvement in 27 patients across 10 studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Palatal fistula repair with free tissue transfer is safe with an acceptable risk profile and low flap loss rate. Early recurrence due to partial flap necrosis and dehiscence are successfully managed with flap readvancement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241266243\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241266243","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
What Free Flaps Are Surgeons Using for Palatal Fistula Repair in Patients with Cleft Palate? A Systematic Review.
Objective: Recalcitrant palatal fistulas in patients with cleft palate history sometimes require free flap reconstruction. This study reviews the literature on described flaps and outcomes.
Design: A systematic review was conducted per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.
Setting: All study designs were included. Non-English articles were excluded.
Patients and participants: Patients with a history of cleft palate who underwent free flap reconstruction for a oronasal fistula.
Interventions: Free tissue transfer for a palatal fistula repair.
Main outcomee measures: Information regarding defect and flap characteristics were reviewed. Surgical outcomes such as flap loss rates, rates of recurrent fistula formation, and speech outcomes were also obtained.
Results: Our search returned 894 articles, of which 23 were included. All studies were retrospective case series and reports. A total of 65 patients were described with an average age of 19.3 (range 3-55) years and a median fistula size of 8.00 cm2 (range 2.54 cm2 - 24 cm2). The most common flap was the radial forearm flap (n = 37). Nine patients (13.8%) had recurrent fistula formation with surgical revision successful in all cases in which the patient returned to the operating room. There were two partial flap losses and no total flap losses. Speech outcomes showed improvement in 27 patients across 10 studies.
Conclusions: Palatal fistula repair with free tissue transfer is safe with an acceptable risk profile and low flap loss rate. Early recurrence due to partial flap necrosis and dehiscence are successfully managed with flap readvancement.
期刊介绍:
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.