综述:全基因组相互作用研究的模拟工具。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1093/bfgp/elae034
Junliang Shang, Anqi Xu, Mingyuan Bi, Yuanyuan Zhang, Feng Li, Jin-Xing Liu
{"title":"综述:全基因组相互作用研究的模拟工具。","authors":"Junliang Shang, Anqi Xu, Mingyuan Bi, Yuanyuan Zhang, Feng Li, Jin-Xing Liu","doi":"10.1093/bfgp/elae034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genome-wide association study (GWAS) is essential for investigating the genetic basis of complex diseases; nevertheless, it usually ignores the interaction of multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Genome-wide interaction studies provide crucial means for exploring complex genetic interactions that GWAS may miss. Although many interaction methods have been proposed, challenges still persist, including the lack of epistasis models and the inconsistency of benchmark datasets. SNP data simulation is a pivotal intermediary between interaction methods and real applications. Therefore, it is important to obtain epistasis models and benchmark datasets by simulation tools, which is helpful for further improving interaction methods. At present, many simulation tools have been widely employed in the field of population genetics. According to their basic principles, these existing tools can be divided into four categories: coalescent simulation, forward-time simulation, resampling simulation, and other simulation frameworks. In this paper, their basic principles and representative simulation tools are compared and analyzed in detail. Additionally, this paper provides a discussion and summary of the advantages and disadvantages of these frameworks and tools, offering technical insights for the design of new methods, and serving as valuable reference tools for researchers to comprehensively understand GWAS and genome-wide interaction studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review: simulation tools for genome-wide interaction studies.\",\"authors\":\"Junliang Shang, Anqi Xu, Mingyuan Bi, Yuanyuan Zhang, Feng Li, Jin-Xing Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bfgp/elae034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Genome-wide association study (GWAS) is essential for investigating the genetic basis of complex diseases; nevertheless, it usually ignores the interaction of multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Genome-wide interaction studies provide crucial means for exploring complex genetic interactions that GWAS may miss. Although many interaction methods have been proposed, challenges still persist, including the lack of epistasis models and the inconsistency of benchmark datasets. SNP data simulation is a pivotal intermediary between interaction methods and real applications. Therefore, it is important to obtain epistasis models and benchmark datasets by simulation tools, which is helpful for further improving interaction methods. At present, many simulation tools have been widely employed in the field of population genetics. According to their basic principles, these existing tools can be divided into four categories: coalescent simulation, forward-time simulation, resampling simulation, and other simulation frameworks. In this paper, their basic principles and representative simulation tools are compared and analyzed in detail. Additionally, this paper provides a discussion and summary of the advantages and disadvantages of these frameworks and tools, offering technical insights for the design of new methods, and serving as valuable reference tools for researchers to comprehensively understand GWAS and genome-wide interaction studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elae034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elae034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全基因组关联研究(GWAS)对于研究复杂疾病的遗传基础至关重要;然而,它通常会忽略多个单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)之间的相互作用。全基因组相互作用研究为探索 GWAS 可能忽略的复杂遗传相互作用提供了重要手段。尽管已经提出了许多交互作用方法,但挑战依然存在,包括缺乏外显模型和基准数据集的不一致性。SNP 数据模拟是相互作用方法与实际应用之间的关键中介。因此,通过模拟工具获得外显模型和基准数据集非常重要,有助于进一步改进交互作用方法。目前,许多模拟工具已在群体遗传学领域得到广泛应用。根据其基本原理,这些现有工具可分为四类:凝聚态模拟、前向时间模拟、重采样模拟和其他模拟框架。本文对它们的基本原理和代表性模拟工具进行了详细比较和分析。此外,本文还对这些框架和工具的优缺点进行了讨论和总结,为新方法的设计提供了技术启示,也为研究人员全面了解 GWAS 和全基因组相互作用研究提供了有价值的参考工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A review: simulation tools for genome-wide interaction studies.

Genome-wide association study (GWAS) is essential for investigating the genetic basis of complex diseases; nevertheless, it usually ignores the interaction of multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Genome-wide interaction studies provide crucial means for exploring complex genetic interactions that GWAS may miss. Although many interaction methods have been proposed, challenges still persist, including the lack of epistasis models and the inconsistency of benchmark datasets. SNP data simulation is a pivotal intermediary between interaction methods and real applications. Therefore, it is important to obtain epistasis models and benchmark datasets by simulation tools, which is helpful for further improving interaction methods. At present, many simulation tools have been widely employed in the field of population genetics. According to their basic principles, these existing tools can be divided into four categories: coalescent simulation, forward-time simulation, resampling simulation, and other simulation frameworks. In this paper, their basic principles and representative simulation tools are compared and analyzed in detail. Additionally, this paper provides a discussion and summary of the advantages and disadvantages of these frameworks and tools, offering technical insights for the design of new methods, and serving as valuable reference tools for researchers to comprehensively understand GWAS and genome-wide interaction studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1