耳鸣频率对主观性耳鸣患者的影响以及声学疗法的疗效和预后

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY American Journal of Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104498
{"title":"耳鸣频率对主观性耳鸣患者的影响以及声学疗法的疗效和预后","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study examines the therapeutic impact and prognosis of acoustic therapy in patients with chronic subjective tinnitus across different tinnitus frequencies.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 135 patients with subjective tinnitus were selected and categorized based on their primary tone frequency into three groups: high frequency (43 patients, 4–8 kHz), mid frequency (40 patients, 1–3 kHz), and low frequency (42 patients, &lt; 1 kHz). All patients received acoustic therapy customized to their specific frequency and loudness levels, along with tinnitus cognitive behavioral therapy. Changes in tinnitus loudness and efficacy rates before and after treatment in the different groups, as well as before and after tinnitus cognitive behavioral therapy were evaluated and assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The low frequency group showed a statistical improvement in tinnitus loudness compared to the mid and high frequency groups (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). The efficacy rate was 93.55 % in the low frequency group, 82.88 % in the mid frequency group, and 58.82 % in the high frequency group. The efficacy rate in the low frequency group was significantly higher than in the high frequency group, but there was no statistical difference when compared to the mid frequency group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The frequency of tinnitus in patients with chronic subjective tinnitus might be a key factor affecting treatment effectiveness and could account for the differences in treatment outcomes among patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of tinnitus frequency on patients experiencing subjective tinnitus and the efficacy and prognosis of acoustic therapy\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study examines the therapeutic impact and prognosis of acoustic therapy in patients with chronic subjective tinnitus across different tinnitus frequencies.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 135 patients with subjective tinnitus were selected and categorized based on their primary tone frequency into three groups: high frequency (43 patients, 4–8 kHz), mid frequency (40 patients, 1–3 kHz), and low frequency (42 patients, &lt; 1 kHz). All patients received acoustic therapy customized to their specific frequency and loudness levels, along with tinnitus cognitive behavioral therapy. Changes in tinnitus loudness and efficacy rates before and after treatment in the different groups, as well as before and after tinnitus cognitive behavioral therapy were evaluated and assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The low frequency group showed a statistical improvement in tinnitus loudness compared to the mid and high frequency groups (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). The efficacy rate was 93.55 % in the low frequency group, 82.88 % in the mid frequency group, and 58.82 % in the high frequency group. The efficacy rate in the low frequency group was significantly higher than in the high frequency group, but there was no statistical difference when compared to the mid frequency group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The frequency of tinnitus in patients with chronic subjective tinnitus might be a key factor affecting treatment effectiveness and could account for the differences in treatment outcomes among patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070924002849\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070924002849","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了声学疗法对不同耳鸣频率的慢性主观性耳鸣患者的治疗效果和预后。方法共选取了135名主观性耳鸣患者,根据他们的主音频率分为三组:高频组(43名患者,4-8 kHz)、中频组(40名患者,1-3 kHz)和低频组(42名患者,< 1 kHz)。所有患者都接受了针对其特定频率和响度水平的声学疗法,以及耳鸣认知行为疗法。结果与中频和高频组相比,低频组的耳鸣响度有统计学改善(P <0.05)。低频组的有效率为 93.55%,中频组为 82.88%,高频组为 58.82%。低频组的有效率明显高于高频组,但与中频组相比无统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The influence of tinnitus frequency on patients experiencing subjective tinnitus and the efficacy and prognosis of acoustic therapy

Objective

This study examines the therapeutic impact and prognosis of acoustic therapy in patients with chronic subjective tinnitus across different tinnitus frequencies.

Methods

A total of 135 patients with subjective tinnitus were selected and categorized based on their primary tone frequency into three groups: high frequency (43 patients, 4–8 kHz), mid frequency (40 patients, 1–3 kHz), and low frequency (42 patients, < 1 kHz). All patients received acoustic therapy customized to their specific frequency and loudness levels, along with tinnitus cognitive behavioral therapy. Changes in tinnitus loudness and efficacy rates before and after treatment in the different groups, as well as before and after tinnitus cognitive behavioral therapy were evaluated and assessed.

Results

The low frequency group showed a statistical improvement in tinnitus loudness compared to the mid and high frequency groups (P < 0.05). The efficacy rate was 93.55 % in the low frequency group, 82.88 % in the mid frequency group, and 58.82 % in the high frequency group. The efficacy rate in the low frequency group was significantly higher than in the high frequency group, but there was no statistical difference when compared to the mid frequency group.

Conclusion

The frequency of tinnitus in patients with chronic subjective tinnitus might be a key factor affecting treatment effectiveness and could account for the differences in treatment outcomes among patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Otolaryngology
American Journal of Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.
期刊最新文献
Neurogenic cough: A commentary on the step-up approach and therapeutic considerations A national survey of otolaryngologists' perspectives on uses and barriers to palliative care. Transoral non-robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma Improving readability and comprehension levels of otolaryngology patient education materials using ChatGPT Analysis of head and eye dynamic may explain saccades in dizzy patients with normal VOR gain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1