探索患者对癫痫发作门诊电话咨询的看法:定性访谈研究

IF 1.8 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsy and Behavior Reports Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ebr.2024.100705
Joseph Ford, Markus Reuber
{"title":"探索患者对癫痫发作门诊电话咨询的看法:定性访谈研究","authors":"Joseph Ford,&nbsp;Markus Reuber","doi":"10.1016/j.ebr.2024.100705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The COVID-19 pandemic brought telemedicine into mainstream medical practice. Although it is widely agreed that telemedicine could be beneficial for patients with seizures, there has been little prior research investigating patients’ views on this subject. In this qualitative study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 patients and one companion about their experiences of telemedicine. We also received written thoughts from one additional patient. Participants’ views fell under three broad themes. The first, “Convenience and practicality”, saw participants praising the flexibility of telephone consultations while noting that such consultations could introduce new practical problems. The second, “(Lack of) shared presence”, covered participants’ generally negative feelings about not being in the same room as their neurologists. The third, “Situation dependency”, saw participants drawing fine distinctions about the circumstances in which face-to-face and telephone consultations were suitable. Overall, although patients with seizures are generally positive about the convenience of telephone consultations, they have concerns about how they may lead to misunderstandings or affect the doctor-patient relationship. These concerns could be assuaged to some extent by offering video consultations or scheduling alternating telephone and face-to-face consultations<em>.</em></p></div>","PeriodicalId":36558,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy and Behavior Reports","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 100705"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589986424000625/pdfft?md5=78a3dbdb16ec4fe913492f2ce585c816&pid=1-s2.0-S2589986424000625-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring patients’ views on telephone consultations in the seizure clinic: A qualitative interview study\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Ford,&nbsp;Markus Reuber\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ebr.2024.100705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The COVID-19 pandemic brought telemedicine into mainstream medical practice. Although it is widely agreed that telemedicine could be beneficial for patients with seizures, there has been little prior research investigating patients’ views on this subject. In this qualitative study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 patients and one companion about their experiences of telemedicine. We also received written thoughts from one additional patient. Participants’ views fell under three broad themes. The first, “Convenience and practicality”, saw participants praising the flexibility of telephone consultations while noting that such consultations could introduce new practical problems. The second, “(Lack of) shared presence”, covered participants’ generally negative feelings about not being in the same room as their neurologists. The third, “Situation dependency”, saw participants drawing fine distinctions about the circumstances in which face-to-face and telephone consultations were suitable. Overall, although patients with seizures are generally positive about the convenience of telephone consultations, they have concerns about how they may lead to misunderstandings or affect the doctor-patient relationship. These concerns could be assuaged to some extent by offering video consultations or scheduling alternating telephone and face-to-face consultations<em>.</em></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsy and Behavior Reports\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100705\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589986424000625/pdfft?md5=78a3dbdb16ec4fe913492f2ce585c816&pid=1-s2.0-S2589986424000625-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsy and Behavior Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589986424000625\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy and Behavior Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589986424000625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19 大流行将远程医疗带入了主流医疗实践。尽管人们普遍认为远程医疗可以为癫痫发作患者带来益处,但此前很少有研究调查患者对这一问题的看法。在这项定性研究中,我们对 10 名患者和一名陪护进行了半结构化访谈,了解他们对远程医疗的体验。我们还收到了另外一名患者的书面意见。参与者的观点分为三大主题。第一个主题是 "便利性和实用性",参与者赞扬了电话会诊的灵活性,同时指出这种会诊可能会带来新的实际问题。第二个主题是"(缺乏)共同在场",与会者对不能与神经科医生同处一室普遍持消极态度。第三个问题是 "情况依赖性",与会者对适合面对面会诊和电话会诊的情况进行了细致的区分。总体而言,尽管癫痫发作患者对电话咨询的便利性普遍持肯定态度,但他们也担心电话咨询可能会导致误解或影响医患关系。通过提供视频会诊或交替安排电话会诊和面对面会诊,可以在一定程度上缓解这些担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring patients’ views on telephone consultations in the seizure clinic: A qualitative interview study

The COVID-19 pandemic brought telemedicine into mainstream medical practice. Although it is widely agreed that telemedicine could be beneficial for patients with seizures, there has been little prior research investigating patients’ views on this subject. In this qualitative study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 patients and one companion about their experiences of telemedicine. We also received written thoughts from one additional patient. Participants’ views fell under three broad themes. The first, “Convenience and practicality”, saw participants praising the flexibility of telephone consultations while noting that such consultations could introduce new practical problems. The second, “(Lack of) shared presence”, covered participants’ generally negative feelings about not being in the same room as their neurologists. The third, “Situation dependency”, saw participants drawing fine distinctions about the circumstances in which face-to-face and telephone consultations were suitable. Overall, although patients with seizures are generally positive about the convenience of telephone consultations, they have concerns about how they may lead to misunderstandings or affect the doctor-patient relationship. These concerns could be assuaged to some extent by offering video consultations or scheduling alternating telephone and face-to-face consultations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy and Behavior Reports
Epilepsy and Behavior Reports Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
50 days
期刊最新文献
Usefulness of perampanel as initial monotherapy in children with non-lesional focal epilepsy Alice in Wonderland Syndrome: Localising insights from right visual cortex stroke complicated by epilepsia partialis continua Effect of deep brain stimulation on the severity of seizures and the quality of life in patients with multifocal drug-resistant epilepsy in Iran: A pilot review of local experience The use of newer anti-seizure medicines in women with epilepsy in pregnancy: A case series Hippocampal gene expression changes associated with sequential behavioral training in a temporal lobe epilepsy rat model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1