右侧结肠癌传统切除术与 D3 淋巴腺切除术的比较:回顾性队列研究

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115911
Praachi Raje , Swati Sonal , Hiroko Kunitake , David L. Berger , Grace C. Lee , Rocco Ricciardi , Satoru Morita , Kohei Shigeta , Koji Okabayashi , Robert N. Goldstone
{"title":"右侧结肠癌传统切除术与 D3 淋巴腺切除术的比较:回顾性队列研究","authors":"Praachi Raje ,&nbsp;Swati Sonal ,&nbsp;Hiroko Kunitake ,&nbsp;David L. Berger ,&nbsp;Grace C. Lee ,&nbsp;Rocco Ricciardi ,&nbsp;Satoru Morita ,&nbsp;Kohei Shigeta ,&nbsp;Koji Okabayashi ,&nbsp;Robert N. Goldstone","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Lymphadenectomy during right hemicolectomy for colon cancer varies between the U.S. and Japan.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients undergoing right hemicolectomy for non-metastatic right-sided colon cancer between 2010 and 2019 ​at U.S. and Japanese institutions were compared. Outcomes included survival, pathologic findings, and postoperative complications.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>319 American patients (57 ​% female, mean age 70 years) underwent conventional resection and 308 Japanese patients (52 ​% female, mean age 70 years) underwent extended dissection. The conventional group underwent more laparotomies (26.6 ​% vs. 8.4 ​%, p ​&lt; ​0.001), had more poorly differentiated histology (31.7 ​% vs. 11.0 ​%, <em>p</em> ​&lt; ​0.01), lower lymph node yield (<em>M</em> ​= ​27 ​± ​11 vs. <em>M</em> ​= ​32 ​± ​14, p ​&lt; ​0.001), and more 30-day readmissions (31 vs. 5, p ​&lt; ​0.001). Adjusting for demographics, pathology, perioperative outcomes, and adjuvant chemotherapy, extended lymphadenectomy improved disease-free survival (HR 0.50; 95 ​% CI, 0.31–0.80; p ​= ​0.004), but not overall survival (HR 0.98; 95 ​% CI, 0.95–1.02; p ​= ​0.14).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Extended lymphadenectomy for right sided-colon cancer improves disease-free, but not overall, survival among Japanese patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 115911"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of conventional resection to D3 lymphadenectomy in right-sided colon cancer: A retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Praachi Raje ,&nbsp;Swati Sonal ,&nbsp;Hiroko Kunitake ,&nbsp;David L. Berger ,&nbsp;Grace C. Lee ,&nbsp;Rocco Ricciardi ,&nbsp;Satoru Morita ,&nbsp;Kohei Shigeta ,&nbsp;Koji Okabayashi ,&nbsp;Robert N. Goldstone\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Lymphadenectomy during right hemicolectomy for colon cancer varies between the U.S. and Japan.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients undergoing right hemicolectomy for non-metastatic right-sided colon cancer between 2010 and 2019 ​at U.S. and Japanese institutions were compared. Outcomes included survival, pathologic findings, and postoperative complications.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>319 American patients (57 ​% female, mean age 70 years) underwent conventional resection and 308 Japanese patients (52 ​% female, mean age 70 years) underwent extended dissection. The conventional group underwent more laparotomies (26.6 ​% vs. 8.4 ​%, p ​&lt; ​0.001), had more poorly differentiated histology (31.7 ​% vs. 11.0 ​%, <em>p</em> ​&lt; ​0.01), lower lymph node yield (<em>M</em> ​= ​27 ​± ​11 vs. <em>M</em> ​= ​32 ​± ​14, p ​&lt; ​0.001), and more 30-day readmissions (31 vs. 5, p ​&lt; ​0.001). Adjusting for demographics, pathology, perioperative outcomes, and adjuvant chemotherapy, extended lymphadenectomy improved disease-free survival (HR 0.50; 95 ​% CI, 0.31–0.80; p ​= ​0.004), but not overall survival (HR 0.98; 95 ​% CI, 0.95–1.02; p ​= ​0.14).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Extended lymphadenectomy for right sided-colon cancer improves disease-free, but not overall, survival among Japanese patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\"237 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115911\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000296102400463X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000296102400463X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景美国和日本在结肠癌右半结肠切除术中的淋巴腺切除术有所不同。方法比较了2010年至2019年期间在美国和日本医疗机构接受右半结肠切除术治疗非转移性右侧结肠癌的患者。结果319名美国患者(57%为女性,平均年龄70岁)接受了传统切除术,308名日本患者(52%为女性,平均年龄70岁)接受了扩大切除术。常规组接受的开腹手术更多(26.6% 对 8.4%,p < 0.001),组织学分化较差(31.7% 对 11.0%,p < 0.01),淋巴结产量较低(M = 27 ± 11 对 M = 32 ± 14,p < 0.001),30 天再住院率更高(31 对 5,p < 0.001)。对人口统计学、病理学、围手术期结果和辅助化疗进行调整后,扩大淋巴腺切除术提高了无病生存率(HR 0.50;95 % CI,0.31-0.80;p = 0.004),但没有提高总生存率(HR 0.98;95 % CI,0.95-1.02;p = 0.14)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of conventional resection to D3 lymphadenectomy in right-sided colon cancer: A retrospective cohort study

Background

Lymphadenectomy during right hemicolectomy for colon cancer varies between the U.S. and Japan.

Methods

Patients undergoing right hemicolectomy for non-metastatic right-sided colon cancer between 2010 and 2019 ​at U.S. and Japanese institutions were compared. Outcomes included survival, pathologic findings, and postoperative complications.

Results

319 American patients (57 ​% female, mean age 70 years) underwent conventional resection and 308 Japanese patients (52 ​% female, mean age 70 years) underwent extended dissection. The conventional group underwent more laparotomies (26.6 ​% vs. 8.4 ​%, p ​< ​0.001), had more poorly differentiated histology (31.7 ​% vs. 11.0 ​%, p ​< ​0.01), lower lymph node yield (M ​= ​27 ​± ​11 vs. M ​= ​32 ​± ​14, p ​< ​0.001), and more 30-day readmissions (31 vs. 5, p ​< ​0.001). Adjusting for demographics, pathology, perioperative outcomes, and adjuvant chemotherapy, extended lymphadenectomy improved disease-free survival (HR 0.50; 95 ​% CI, 0.31–0.80; p ​= ​0.004), but not overall survival (HR 0.98; 95 ​% CI, 0.95–1.02; p ​= ​0.14).

Conclusions

Extended lymphadenectomy for right sided-colon cancer improves disease-free, but not overall, survival among Japanese patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Destructive colon injuries associated with severe pancreatic injuries: Primary anastomosis or ostomy Who is going to perform the operation? Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for pediatric patients with abdominal firearm injuries Value capture in surgery: Thoughts on metrics, autonomy, and academic success Military-civilian partnerships in the South Puget Sound: Relationships for healthcare readiness and emergency preparedness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1