前列腺癌患者的 DNA 损伤治疗与同源重组修复基因的致病性改变。

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JCO precision oncology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1200/PO.24.00014
Laura S Graham, Nicholas C Henderson, Olesia Kellezi, Clara Hwang, Pedro C Barata, Mehmet A Bilen, Deepak Kilari, Michael Pierro, Bicky Thapa, Abhishek Tripathi, George Mo, Matthew Labriola, Joseph J Park, Shoshana Rothstein, Rohan Garje, Vadim S Koshkin, Vaibhav G Patel, Tanya Dorff, Andrew J Armstrong, Rana R McKay, Ajjai Alva, Michael T Schweizer
{"title":"前列腺癌患者的 DNA 损伤治疗与同源重组修复基因的致病性改变。","authors":"Laura S Graham, Nicholas C Henderson, Olesia Kellezi, Clara Hwang, Pedro C Barata, Mehmet A Bilen, Deepak Kilari, Michael Pierro, Bicky Thapa, Abhishek Tripathi, George Mo, Matthew Labriola, Joseph J Park, Shoshana Rothstein, Rohan Garje, Vadim S Koshkin, Vaibhav G Patel, Tanya Dorff, Andrew J Armstrong, Rana R McKay, Ajjai Alva, Michael T Schweizer","doi":"10.1200/PO.24.00014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Outcomes data for DNA-damaging therapeutics for men with prostate cancer (PC) and non-<i>BRCA1/2</i> homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutations are limited. We evaluated outcomes by HRR alteration in men with PC treated with poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and/or platinum chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data from the PROMISE consortium were used. Clinical outcomes differences were assessed between patients with <i>BRCA1</i>/<i>2</i> mutations (cohort A) and those with HRR mutations without direct BRCA complex interaction (cohort B: <i>ATM</i>, <i>CDK12</i>, <i>CHEK1</i>, <i>CHEK2</i>, and <i>FANCL</i>). Outcomes in patients with HRR mutations with direct BRCA complex interaction were also explored (cohort C: <i>RAD51B/C/D</i>, <i>RAD54L2</i>, <i>BARD1</i>, <i>GEN1</i>, <i>PALB2</i>, <i>FANCA</i>, and <i>BRIP1</i>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and forty-six patients received PARPi (cohort A: 94, cohort B: 45, cohort C: 7) and 104 received platinum chemotherapy (cohort A: 48, cohort B: 44, cohort C: 10). PSA50 response rate to PARPi was higher in cohort A (61%) than cohort B (5%), <i>P</i> < .001. Median clinical/radiographic progression-free survival (crPFS) with PARPi in cohort A was significantly longer than in cohort B: 15.9 versus 8.7 months, <i>P</i> = .005. PSA50 response rate to platinum therapy was higher in cohort A (62%) than in cohort B (32%), <i>P</i> = .024, although crPFS was not significantly different. PSA50 response rate to PARPi and platinum was 40% and 32%, respectively, in cohort C. In multivariable analysis, cohort A had significantly improved overall survival and crPFS compared with cohort B with PARPi but not platinum chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with <i>BRCA1/2</i>-mutated PC had significantly improved outcomes to PARPi but not platinum chemotherapy compared with those with HRR mutations without direct BRCA complex interaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e2400014"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346579/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DNA-Damaging Therapies in Patients With Prostate Cancer and Pathogenic Alterations in Homologous Recombination Repair Genes.\",\"authors\":\"Laura S Graham, Nicholas C Henderson, Olesia Kellezi, Clara Hwang, Pedro C Barata, Mehmet A Bilen, Deepak Kilari, Michael Pierro, Bicky Thapa, Abhishek Tripathi, George Mo, Matthew Labriola, Joseph J Park, Shoshana Rothstein, Rohan Garje, Vadim S Koshkin, Vaibhav G Patel, Tanya Dorff, Andrew J Armstrong, Rana R McKay, Ajjai Alva, Michael T Schweizer\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/PO.24.00014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Outcomes data for DNA-damaging therapeutics for men with prostate cancer (PC) and non-<i>BRCA1/2</i> homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutations are limited. We evaluated outcomes by HRR alteration in men with PC treated with poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and/or platinum chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data from the PROMISE consortium were used. Clinical outcomes differences were assessed between patients with <i>BRCA1</i>/<i>2</i> mutations (cohort A) and those with HRR mutations without direct BRCA complex interaction (cohort B: <i>ATM</i>, <i>CDK12</i>, <i>CHEK1</i>, <i>CHEK2</i>, and <i>FANCL</i>). Outcomes in patients with HRR mutations with direct BRCA complex interaction were also explored (cohort C: <i>RAD51B/C/D</i>, <i>RAD54L2</i>, <i>BARD1</i>, <i>GEN1</i>, <i>PALB2</i>, <i>FANCA</i>, and <i>BRIP1</i>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and forty-six patients received PARPi (cohort A: 94, cohort B: 45, cohort C: 7) and 104 received platinum chemotherapy (cohort A: 48, cohort B: 44, cohort C: 10). PSA50 response rate to PARPi was higher in cohort A (61%) than cohort B (5%), <i>P</i> < .001. Median clinical/radiographic progression-free survival (crPFS) with PARPi in cohort A was significantly longer than in cohort B: 15.9 versus 8.7 months, <i>P</i> = .005. PSA50 response rate to platinum therapy was higher in cohort A (62%) than in cohort B (32%), <i>P</i> = .024, although crPFS was not significantly different. PSA50 response rate to PARPi and platinum was 40% and 32%, respectively, in cohort C. In multivariable analysis, cohort A had significantly improved overall survival and crPFS compared with cohort B with PARPi but not platinum chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with <i>BRCA1/2</i>-mutated PC had significantly improved outcomes to PARPi but not platinum chemotherapy compared with those with HRR mutations without direct BRCA complex interaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"e2400014\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346579/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.24.00014\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.24.00014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:针对前列腺癌(PC)和非 BRCA1/2 同源重组修复(HRR)突变男性患者的 DNA 损伤疗法的疗效数据非常有限。我们评估了接受聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶抑制剂(PARPi)和/或铂类化疗的男性前列腺癌患者的 HRR 变异情况:方法:采用PROMISE联盟的回顾性数据。评估了BRCA1/2突变患者(群组A)与无直接BRCA复合体相互作用的HRR突变患者(群组B:ATM、CDK12、CHEK1、CHEK2和FANCL)之间的临床结果差异。此外,还探讨了具有直接 BRCA 复合体相互作用的 HRR 突变的患者(C 组:RAD51B/C/D、RAD54L2、BARD1、GEN1、PALB2、FANCA 和 BRIP1)的治疗结果:146名患者接受了PARPi治疗(A组:94人,B组:45人,C组:7人),104名患者接受了铂类化疗(A组:48人,B组:44人,C组:10人)。A组对PARPi的PSA50反应率(61%)高于B组(5%),P < .001。A组患者使用PARPi后的临床/放射学无进展生存期(crPFS)中位数明显长于B组:15.9个月对8.7个月,P = .005。A组对铂类疗法的PSA50反应率(62%)高于B组(32%),P = .024,但crPFS无显著差异。在多变量分析中,与接受PARPi化疗但未接受铂金化疗的队列B相比,队列A的总生存期和crPFS显著改善:结论:BRCA1/2基因突变的PC患者与HRR基因突变但无BRCA复合物直接相互作用的患者相比,接受PARPi而非铂类化疗的疗效显著提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DNA-Damaging Therapies in Patients With Prostate Cancer and Pathogenic Alterations in Homologous Recombination Repair Genes.

Purpose: Outcomes data for DNA-damaging therapeutics for men with prostate cancer (PC) and non-BRCA1/2 homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutations are limited. We evaluated outcomes by HRR alteration in men with PC treated with poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and/or platinum chemotherapy.

Methods: Retrospective data from the PROMISE consortium were used. Clinical outcomes differences were assessed between patients with BRCA1/2 mutations (cohort A) and those with HRR mutations without direct BRCA complex interaction (cohort B: ATM, CDK12, CHEK1, CHEK2, and FANCL). Outcomes in patients with HRR mutations with direct BRCA complex interaction were also explored (cohort C: RAD51B/C/D, RAD54L2, BARD1, GEN1, PALB2, FANCA, and BRIP1).

Results: One hundred and forty-six patients received PARPi (cohort A: 94, cohort B: 45, cohort C: 7) and 104 received platinum chemotherapy (cohort A: 48, cohort B: 44, cohort C: 10). PSA50 response rate to PARPi was higher in cohort A (61%) than cohort B (5%), P < .001. Median clinical/radiographic progression-free survival (crPFS) with PARPi in cohort A was significantly longer than in cohort B: 15.9 versus 8.7 months, P = .005. PSA50 response rate to platinum therapy was higher in cohort A (62%) than in cohort B (32%), P = .024, although crPFS was not significantly different. PSA50 response rate to PARPi and platinum was 40% and 32%, respectively, in cohort C. In multivariable analysis, cohort A had significantly improved overall survival and crPFS compared with cohort B with PARPi but not platinum chemotherapy.

Conclusion: Patients with BRCA1/2-mutated PC had significantly improved outcomes to PARPi but not platinum chemotherapy compared with those with HRR mutations without direct BRCA complex interaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
期刊最新文献
DNA Damage Response Alterations Predict for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Sensitivity in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Correlative Analysis of the SWOG S1314 Trial. Erratum: Tumor Characteristics Associated With Preoperatively Detectable Tumor-Informed Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Renal Masses Suspicious for Renal Cell Carcinoma. DNA Methylation Classes of Stage II and III Primary Melanomas and Their Clinical and Prognostic Significance. KRASG12D-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Clinical, Molecular, Immunologic, and Prognostic Features of a New Emerging Targeted Alteration. Neo-wt-RAS in ctDNA: Is It Worth Using Anti-EGFR Therapies?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1