加拿大癌症试验小组 CO.26 试验中利用循环肿瘤 DNA 对 RAS 基因突变进行的动力学分析表明,新 RAS 野生型转移性结直肠癌中 RAS 基因突变的缺失是短暂的。

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JCO precision oncology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1200/PO.24.00031
Florence T H Wu, James T Topham, Chris J O'Callaghan, Harriet Feilotter, Hagen F Kennecke, Leylah Drusbosky, Daniel J Renouf, Derek J Jonker, Dongsheng Tu, Eric X Chen, Jonathan M Loree
{"title":"加拿大癌症试验小组 CO.26 试验中利用循环肿瘤 DNA 对 RAS 基因突变进行的动力学分析表明,新 RAS 野生型转移性结直肠癌中 RAS 基因突变的缺失是短暂的。","authors":"Florence T H Wu, James T Topham, Chris J O'Callaghan, Harriet Feilotter, Hagen F Kennecke, Leylah Drusbosky, Daniel J Renouf, Derek J Jonker, Dongsheng Tu, Eric X Chen, Jonathan M Loree","doi":"10.1200/PO.24.00031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), <i>RAS</i> mutations drive resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies. It is unclear whether <i>RAS</i> mutations ever become clonally undetectable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CO.26 was a phase II clinical trial that assessed durvalumab + tremelimumab in heavily pretreated mCRC. <i>RAS</i> mutation status was tracked over time using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing at baseline, week 8, and on progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 95 patients with <i>KRAS/NRAS</i> mutations in their archival tumor tissue, 6.3% (6/95) had undetectable <i>RAS</i> mutations in ctDNA collected at baseline or week 8 of the CO.26 study. Of these, 67% (4/6) of disappearances were transient, with the same mutation reappearing with progressive disease. In three cases, the simultaneous persistence of other preexisting CRC-associated truncal mutations could not be demonstrated, suggestive of low tumor shedding of ctDNA, leaving the incidence of true clonal reversion to <i>RAS</i>-wildtype (WT) possibly as low as 3.2% (3/95). Fewer patients in the neo-<i>RAS</i>-WT group (33%) had greater than four lesions at trial baseline compared with patients with persistent <i>RAS</i> mutations (75%), <i>P</i> = .046. The likelihood of synchronous metastases at cancer diagnosis (33% <i>v</i> 63%; <i>P</i> = .15) or liver metastases at trial baseline (50% <i>v</i> 68.5%; <i>P</i> = .17) was not significantly different between patients with disappearing versus persistent <i>RAS</i> mutations. Overall survival from stage IV diagnosis (hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.35 to 1.72]; <i>P</i> = .52) was not significantly different between those with disappearing versus persistent <i>RAS</i> mutations. The disappearance of <i>RAS</i> mutations was not associated with primary tumor sidedness (<i>P</i> = .41), archival <i>BRAF/MEK/ERK</i>-mutant status (<i>P</i> = .16/1.00/.09), nor baseline ctDNA <i>HER2</i> amplifications (<i>P</i> = 1.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified a 3.2%-6.3% prevalence of the neo-<i>RAS</i>-WT phenomenon in the CO.26 trial. However, 67% of apparent cases were transient with subsequent re-emergence.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e2400031"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371075/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kinetic Profiling of <i>RAS</i> Mutations With Circulating Tumor DNA in the Canadian Cancer Trials Group CO.26 Trial Suggests the Loss of <i>RAS</i> Mutations in Neo-<i>RAS</i>-Wildtype Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Is Transient.\",\"authors\":\"Florence T H Wu, James T Topham, Chris J O'Callaghan, Harriet Feilotter, Hagen F Kennecke, Leylah Drusbosky, Daniel J Renouf, Derek J Jonker, Dongsheng Tu, Eric X Chen, Jonathan M Loree\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/PO.24.00031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), <i>RAS</i> mutations drive resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies. It is unclear whether <i>RAS</i> mutations ever become clonally undetectable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CO.26 was a phase II clinical trial that assessed durvalumab + tremelimumab in heavily pretreated mCRC. <i>RAS</i> mutation status was tracked over time using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing at baseline, week 8, and on progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 95 patients with <i>KRAS/NRAS</i> mutations in their archival tumor tissue, 6.3% (6/95) had undetectable <i>RAS</i> mutations in ctDNA collected at baseline or week 8 of the CO.26 study. Of these, 67% (4/6) of disappearances were transient, with the same mutation reappearing with progressive disease. In three cases, the simultaneous persistence of other preexisting CRC-associated truncal mutations could not be demonstrated, suggestive of low tumor shedding of ctDNA, leaving the incidence of true clonal reversion to <i>RAS</i>-wildtype (WT) possibly as low as 3.2% (3/95). Fewer patients in the neo-<i>RAS</i>-WT group (33%) had greater than four lesions at trial baseline compared with patients with persistent <i>RAS</i> mutations (75%), <i>P</i> = .046. The likelihood of synchronous metastases at cancer diagnosis (33% <i>v</i> 63%; <i>P</i> = .15) or liver metastases at trial baseline (50% <i>v</i> 68.5%; <i>P</i> = .17) was not significantly different between patients with disappearing versus persistent <i>RAS</i> mutations. Overall survival from stage IV diagnosis (hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.35 to 1.72]; <i>P</i> = .52) was not significantly different between those with disappearing versus persistent <i>RAS</i> mutations. The disappearance of <i>RAS</i> mutations was not associated with primary tumor sidedness (<i>P</i> = .41), archival <i>BRAF/MEK/ERK</i>-mutant status (<i>P</i> = .16/1.00/.09), nor baseline ctDNA <i>HER2</i> amplifications (<i>P</i> = 1.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified a 3.2%-6.3% prevalence of the neo-<i>RAS</i>-WT phenomenon in the CO.26 trial. However, 67% of apparent cases were transient with subsequent re-emergence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"e2400031\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371075/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.24.00031\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.24.00031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)中,RAS突变会导致患者对抗表皮生长因子受体抗体产生耐药性。目前还不清楚RAS突变是否会导致克隆检测不到:CO.26是一项II期临床试验,评估了杜伐单抗+曲妥珠单抗在重度预处理mCRC中的疗效。在基线、第8周和进展期使用循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)测序对RAS突变状态进行长期追踪:在存档肿瘤组织中存在 KRAS/NRAS 突变的 95 例患者中,6.3%(6/95)在 CO.26 研究的基线或第 8 周采集的 ctDNA 中检测不到 RAS 突变。其中,67%(4/6)的突变消失是短暂的,随着疾病的进展,同一突变会再次出现。在三个病例中,无法证明同时存在其他先前存在的与 CRC 相关的截断突变,这表明肿瘤脱落的 ctDNA 很低,因此真正克隆还原为 RAS-野生型(WT)的发生率可能低至 3.2%(3/95)。与RAS突变持续存在的患者(75%)相比,新RAS-WT组在试验基线时病变超过4个的患者较少(33%),P = .046。癌症诊断时同步转移的可能性(33% 对 63%;P = .15)或试验基线时肝脏转移的可能性(50% 对 68.5%;P = .17)在RAS突变消失和持续存在的患者之间没有显著差异。从 IV 期诊断开始的总生存期(危险比为 0.77 [95% CI, 0.35 至 1.72];P = .52)在 RAS 突变消失与持续存在的患者之间没有明显差异。RAS突变的消失与原发肿瘤的偏侧(P = .41)、存档的BRAF/MEK/ERK突变状态(P = .16/1.00/.09)以及基线ctDNA HER2扩增(P = 1.00)无关:我们在CO.26试验中发现新RAS-WT现象的发生率为3.2%-6.3%。结论:我们在 CO.26 试验中发现了 3.2%-6.3% 的新 RAS-WT 现象,但 67% 的明显病例是一过性的,随后又重新出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kinetic Profiling of RAS Mutations With Circulating Tumor DNA in the Canadian Cancer Trials Group CO.26 Trial Suggests the Loss of RAS Mutations in Neo-RAS-Wildtype Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Is Transient.

Purpose: In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), RAS mutations drive resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies. It is unclear whether RAS mutations ever become clonally undetectable.

Methods: CO.26 was a phase II clinical trial that assessed durvalumab + tremelimumab in heavily pretreated mCRC. RAS mutation status was tracked over time using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing at baseline, week 8, and on progression.

Results: Among the 95 patients with KRAS/NRAS mutations in their archival tumor tissue, 6.3% (6/95) had undetectable RAS mutations in ctDNA collected at baseline or week 8 of the CO.26 study. Of these, 67% (4/6) of disappearances were transient, with the same mutation reappearing with progressive disease. In three cases, the simultaneous persistence of other preexisting CRC-associated truncal mutations could not be demonstrated, suggestive of low tumor shedding of ctDNA, leaving the incidence of true clonal reversion to RAS-wildtype (WT) possibly as low as 3.2% (3/95). Fewer patients in the neo-RAS-WT group (33%) had greater than four lesions at trial baseline compared with patients with persistent RAS mutations (75%), P = .046. The likelihood of synchronous metastases at cancer diagnosis (33% v 63%; P = .15) or liver metastases at trial baseline (50% v 68.5%; P = .17) was not significantly different between patients with disappearing versus persistent RAS mutations. Overall survival from stage IV diagnosis (hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.35 to 1.72]; P = .52) was not significantly different between those with disappearing versus persistent RAS mutations. The disappearance of RAS mutations was not associated with primary tumor sidedness (P = .41), archival BRAF/MEK/ERK-mutant status (P = .16/1.00/.09), nor baseline ctDNA HER2 amplifications (P = 1.00).

Conclusion: We identified a 3.2%-6.3% prevalence of the neo-RAS-WT phenomenon in the CO.26 trial. However, 67% of apparent cases were transient with subsequent re-emergence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
期刊最新文献
DNA Damage Response Alterations Predict for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Sensitivity in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Correlative Analysis of the SWOG S1314 Trial. Erratum: Tumor Characteristics Associated With Preoperatively Detectable Tumor-Informed Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Renal Masses Suspicious for Renal Cell Carcinoma. DNA Methylation Classes of Stage II and III Primary Melanomas and Their Clinical and Prognostic Significance. KRASG12D-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Clinical, Molecular, Immunologic, and Prognostic Features of a New Emerging Targeted Alteration. Neo-wt-RAS in ctDNA: Is It Worth Using Anti-EGFR Therapies?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1