改变和摆脱自杀倾向的跨理论模型。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Archives of Suicide Research Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1080/13811118.2024.2394674
Yosef Sokol, Yaakov Wahl, Sofie Glatt, Chynna Levin, Patricia Tran, Marianne Goodman
{"title":"改变和摆脱自杀倾向的跨理论模型。","authors":"Yosef Sokol, Yaakov Wahl, Sofie Glatt, Chynna Levin, Patricia Tran, Marianne Goodman","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2394674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Transtheoretical Model of Change (TTM) is an established model outlining five stages of change within a psychotherapeutic context: pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance. Research shows that these models benefit patients and clinicians by enhancing their understanding of complex processes and identifying optimal therapeutic support for individuals at specific times. This study aimed to apply the TTM to personal recovery following a suicidal episode.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A meta-synthesis was conducted on qualitative studies that outlined distinct phases or stages of recovery from a suicidal episode. The identified recovery stages were mapped onto corresponding TTM stages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recovery processes followed a pattern aligning with TTM stages, but the action, maintenance, and termination stages were not clearly distinguished in the context of personal recovery. A three-stage model was proposed instead: (1) precontemplation, where recovery is not seen as possible or meaningful; (2) contemplation, during which there is growing awareness and consideration of the possibility of recovery and change; and (3) active growth, which is characterized by ongoing progress and engagement in at least one personal recovery process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed three-stage model condenses the later TTM stages and may better reflect personal recovery from a suicidal episode. Applying the model in clinical settings could help with case conceptualization and inform recovery approaches to an individual's current stage. Future research should evaluate the benefits of incorporating stages of change into suicide-focused recovery interventions to develop more effective interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Transtheoretical Model of Change and Recovery from a Suicidal Episode.\",\"authors\":\"Yosef Sokol, Yaakov Wahl, Sofie Glatt, Chynna Levin, Patricia Tran, Marianne Goodman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13811118.2024.2394674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Transtheoretical Model of Change (TTM) is an established model outlining five stages of change within a psychotherapeutic context: pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance. Research shows that these models benefit patients and clinicians by enhancing their understanding of complex processes and identifying optimal therapeutic support for individuals at specific times. This study aimed to apply the TTM to personal recovery following a suicidal episode.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A meta-synthesis was conducted on qualitative studies that outlined distinct phases or stages of recovery from a suicidal episode. The identified recovery stages were mapped onto corresponding TTM stages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recovery processes followed a pattern aligning with TTM stages, but the action, maintenance, and termination stages were not clearly distinguished in the context of personal recovery. A three-stage model was proposed instead: (1) precontemplation, where recovery is not seen as possible or meaningful; (2) contemplation, during which there is growing awareness and consideration of the possibility of recovery and change; and (3) active growth, which is characterized by ongoing progress and engagement in at least one personal recovery process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed three-stage model condenses the later TTM stages and may better reflect personal recovery from a suicidal episode. Applying the model in clinical settings could help with case conceptualization and inform recovery approaches to an individual's current stage. Future research should evaluate the benefits of incorporating stages of change into suicide-focused recovery interventions to develop more effective interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Suicide Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Suicide Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2394674\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Suicide Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2394674","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的改变的跨理论模型(TTM)是一个成熟的模型,概述了心理治疗背景下改变的五个阶段:前沉思、沉思、准备、行动和维持。研究表明,这些模型可以增强患者和临床医生对复杂过程的理解,并确定在特定时期对个人的最佳治疗支持,从而使患者和临床医生受益。本研究旨在将 TTM 应用于自杀事件后的个人恢复:方法:我们对概述了自杀事件后康复的不同阶段的定性研究进行了元综合。将确定的恢复阶段映射到相应的 TTM 阶段:结果:恢复过程遵循与 TTM 阶段一致的模式,但在个人恢复的背景下,行动、维持和终止阶段没有得到明确区分。因此,提出了一个三阶段模型:(1)前沉思,在这一阶段,康复被认为是不可能的或没有意义的;(2)沉思,在这一阶段,对康复和改变的可能性有了越来越多的认识和考虑;(3)积极成长,这一阶段的特点是不断取得进展并参与至少一个个人康复过程:结论:所提出的三阶段模型浓缩了 TTM 的后期阶段,可以更好地反映个人从自杀事件中恢复的情况。在临床环境中应用该模型有助于对病例进行概念化,并为个人当前阶段的康复方法提供参考。未来的研究应评估将变化阶段纳入以自杀为重点的康复干预的益处,以开发更有效的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Transtheoretical Model of Change and Recovery from a Suicidal Episode.

Objective: The Transtheoretical Model of Change (TTM) is an established model outlining five stages of change within a psychotherapeutic context: pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance. Research shows that these models benefit patients and clinicians by enhancing their understanding of complex processes and identifying optimal therapeutic support for individuals at specific times. This study aimed to apply the TTM to personal recovery following a suicidal episode.

Method: A meta-synthesis was conducted on qualitative studies that outlined distinct phases or stages of recovery from a suicidal episode. The identified recovery stages were mapped onto corresponding TTM stages.

Results: Recovery processes followed a pattern aligning with TTM stages, but the action, maintenance, and termination stages were not clearly distinguished in the context of personal recovery. A three-stage model was proposed instead: (1) precontemplation, where recovery is not seen as possible or meaningful; (2) contemplation, during which there is growing awareness and consideration of the possibility of recovery and change; and (3) active growth, which is characterized by ongoing progress and engagement in at least one personal recovery process.

Conclusions: The proposed three-stage model condenses the later TTM stages and may better reflect personal recovery from a suicidal episode. Applying the model in clinical settings could help with case conceptualization and inform recovery approaches to an individual's current stage. Future research should evaluate the benefits of incorporating stages of change into suicide-focused recovery interventions to develop more effective interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Archives of Suicide Research, the official journal of the International Academy of Suicide Research (IASR), is the international journal in the field of suicidology. The journal features original, refereed contributions on the study of suicide, suicidal behavior, its causes and effects, and techniques for prevention. The journal incorporates research-based and theoretical articles contributed by a diverse range of authors interested in investigating the biological, pharmacological, psychiatric, psychological, and sociological aspects of suicide.
期刊最新文献
Development and Validation of Electronic Health Record Measures of Safety Planning Practices as Part of Zero Suicide Implementation. Acceptability and Feasibility of an Ecological Momentary Intervention for Managing Emotional Distress Among Psychiatric Inpatients at Risk for Suicide. The Progression of Lethality Across Multiple Suicide Attempts: A Systematic Review. The Transtheoretical Model of Change and Recovery from a Suicidal Episode. Assessing a Suicide Prevention Helpline's Impact on Caller Crisis Level and Suicidality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1