在启动创伤机制时外科团队参与对电动自行车或全地形车致伤的儿科患者的影响。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003261
Katherine Bergus, Shruthi Srinivas, Celia Ligorski, Sydney Castellanos, Rajan Thakkar, Dana Schwartz
{"title":"在启动创伤机制时外科团队参与对电动自行车或全地形车致伤的儿科患者的影响。","authors":"Katherine Bergus, Shruthi Srinivas, Celia Ligorski, Sydney Castellanos, Rajan Thakkar, Dana Schwartz","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>At our institution, level 2 trauma (L2T) activations are primarily managed by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians, whereas level 1 activations are co-managed by pediatric surgery and PEM. Starting in September 2019, the response to L2T activations due to all-terrain vehicles or motorized cycles (ATVs/MCs) changed to include surgical assessment upon patient arrival due to increased likelihood of significant injuries and need for higher level of care. The impact of PEM/surgery co-management of ATV/MC L2T patients on time to an admission decision is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed patients <18 years of age presenting to our American College of Surgeons-verified level 1 pediatric trauma center as L2T activations with ATV/MC mechanism between 1/2016 and 10/2022. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, details of imaging, interventions, and emergency department (ED) course were recorded. The χ 2 and Fisher exact tests were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred fifty-five patients met the inclusion criteria prior to augmenting our response to include surgical presence at L2T-ATV/MC activations, and 216 patients were treated after our protocol change. There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, race, transfer status, vehicle subtype, or Injury Severity Scores between groups. Trauma surgery was involved in the care of 74.8% of L2T-ATV/MC patients before protocol augmentation and 87% after ( P = 0.003). Time to an admission decision significantly decreased by 22.5 minutes (117 minutes [interquartile range, 72-178] vs 94.5 minutes [interquartile range, 60-139]; P = 0.023) after protocol augmentation. There was a trend toward increased completion of mandated postsecondary survey communication huddles after protocol change (84.6% to 91.2%, P = 0.089). The median total ED length of stay did not differ between admitted and discharged patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early surgical assessment for pediatric patients with ATV/MC injuries improved time to an admission decision and trauma communication huddle compliance. Next steps include identifying process improvement opportunities to decrease ED total length of stay for patients with ATV/MC injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":"e277-e282"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Surgical Team Involvement at the Time of Trauma Activation for Pediatric Patients With Motorized Cycle or All-Terrain Vehicle Injury Mechanism.\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Bergus, Shruthi Srinivas, Celia Ligorski, Sydney Castellanos, Rajan Thakkar, Dana Schwartz\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>At our institution, level 2 trauma (L2T) activations are primarily managed by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians, whereas level 1 activations are co-managed by pediatric surgery and PEM. Starting in September 2019, the response to L2T activations due to all-terrain vehicles or motorized cycles (ATVs/MCs) changed to include surgical assessment upon patient arrival due to increased likelihood of significant injuries and need for higher level of care. The impact of PEM/surgery co-management of ATV/MC L2T patients on time to an admission decision is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed patients <18 years of age presenting to our American College of Surgeons-verified level 1 pediatric trauma center as L2T activations with ATV/MC mechanism between 1/2016 and 10/2022. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, details of imaging, interventions, and emergency department (ED) course were recorded. The χ 2 and Fisher exact tests were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred fifty-five patients met the inclusion criteria prior to augmenting our response to include surgical presence at L2T-ATV/MC activations, and 216 patients were treated after our protocol change. There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, race, transfer status, vehicle subtype, or Injury Severity Scores between groups. Trauma surgery was involved in the care of 74.8% of L2T-ATV/MC patients before protocol augmentation and 87% after ( P = 0.003). Time to an admission decision significantly decreased by 22.5 minutes (117 minutes [interquartile range, 72-178] vs 94.5 minutes [interquartile range, 60-139]; P = 0.023) after protocol augmentation. There was a trend toward increased completion of mandated postsecondary survey communication huddles after protocol change (84.6% to 91.2%, P = 0.089). The median total ED length of stay did not differ between admitted and discharged patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early surgical assessment for pediatric patients with ATV/MC injuries improved time to an admission decision and trauma communication huddle compliance. Next steps include identifying process improvement opportunities to decrease ED total length of stay for patients with ATV/MC injuries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e277-e282\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003261\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003261","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在我院,2 级创伤(L2T)启动主要由儿科急诊医学(PEM)医师管理,而 1 级启动则由儿科外科和儿科急诊医学医师共同管理。从 2019 年 9 月开始,对因全地形车或电动自行车(ATV/MCs)导致的 L2T 启动的应对措施改为在患者到达后进行外科评估,原因是患者受重伤的可能性增加,需要更高级别的护理。对全地形车/机动单车 L2T 患者进行 PEM/外科共同管理对入院决定时间的影响尚不清楚:我们对患者进行了回顾性分析:在我们加强应对措施,将手术纳入 L2T-ATV/MC 激活之前,有 155 名患者符合纳入标准,而在我们改变方案后,有 216 名患者接受了治疗。两组患者在年龄、性别、种族、转院情况、车辆亚型或受伤严重程度评分方面没有明显的统计学差异。增强方案前,74.8% 的 L2T-ATV/MC 患者接受了创伤外科治疗,增强方案后,87% 的患者接受了创伤外科治疗(P = 0.003)。增强方案后,做出入院决定的时间明显缩短了 22.5 分钟(117 分钟 [四分位数间距,72-178] vs 94.5 分钟 [四分位数间距,60-139];P = 0.023)。协议变更后,强制性中学后调查交流会的完成率呈上升趋势(从 84.6% 上升至 91.2%,P = 0.089)。入院患者和出院患者的急诊室总住院时间中位数没有差异:结论:对ATV/MC损伤的儿科患者进行早期手术评估缩短了入院时间,并提高了创伤沟通小组的合规性。下一步工作包括确定改进流程的机会,以缩短ATV/MC损伤患者的急诊室总住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Surgical Team Involvement at the Time of Trauma Activation for Pediatric Patients With Motorized Cycle or All-Terrain Vehicle Injury Mechanism.

Objectives: At our institution, level 2 trauma (L2T) activations are primarily managed by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians, whereas level 1 activations are co-managed by pediatric surgery and PEM. Starting in September 2019, the response to L2T activations due to all-terrain vehicles or motorized cycles (ATVs/MCs) changed to include surgical assessment upon patient arrival due to increased likelihood of significant injuries and need for higher level of care. The impact of PEM/surgery co-management of ATV/MC L2T patients on time to an admission decision is unknown.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients <18 years of age presenting to our American College of Surgeons-verified level 1 pediatric trauma center as L2T activations with ATV/MC mechanism between 1/2016 and 10/2022. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, details of imaging, interventions, and emergency department (ED) course were recorded. The χ 2 and Fisher exact tests were performed.

Results: One hundred fifty-five patients met the inclusion criteria prior to augmenting our response to include surgical presence at L2T-ATV/MC activations, and 216 patients were treated after our protocol change. There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, race, transfer status, vehicle subtype, or Injury Severity Scores between groups. Trauma surgery was involved in the care of 74.8% of L2T-ATV/MC patients before protocol augmentation and 87% after ( P = 0.003). Time to an admission decision significantly decreased by 22.5 minutes (117 minutes [interquartile range, 72-178] vs 94.5 minutes [interquartile range, 60-139]; P = 0.023) after protocol augmentation. There was a trend toward increased completion of mandated postsecondary survey communication huddles after protocol change (84.6% to 91.2%, P = 0.089). The median total ED length of stay did not differ between admitted and discharged patients.

Conclusions: Early surgical assessment for pediatric patients with ATV/MC injuries improved time to an admission decision and trauma communication huddle compliance. Next steps include identifying process improvement opportunities to decrease ED total length of stay for patients with ATV/MC injuries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
期刊最新文献
Streamlining Telecommunications Center and Interfacility Patient Throughput to a Pediatric Emergency Department by Utilizing an Electronic Handoff: A Quality Improvement Initiative. Point-of-Care Ultrasound Evaluation of Pediatric Osteomyelitis in the Emergency Department: A Case Series. Sometimes, One Pill Really Can Kill. Video Versus Nonvideo in a Rabbit Training Model for Establishing an Emergency Front of Neck Airway in Children: A Prospective Trial. The Impact of Legalizing Recreational Cannabis on the Children of a Neighboring State.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1