Bailey D Lyttle, S Christopher Derderian, Ilana Neuberger, Nicholas J Behrendt, Kaci Pickett-Nairne, Christian R Francom, Kenneth W Liechty, Mariana L Meyers
{"title":"通过超声波和核磁共振成像计算小颌畸形胎儿下颌测量值的最佳地标比较。","authors":"Bailey D Lyttle, S Christopher Derderian, Ilana Neuberger, Nicholas J Behrendt, Kaci Pickett-Nairne, Christian R Francom, Kenneth W Liechty, Mariana L Meyers","doi":"10.1007/s00247-024-06032-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Micrognathia can be diagnosed in utero with ultrasound by measuring the jaw index and/or inferior facial angle, though it can be challenging due to fetal positioning. The jaw index can be measured with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using the masseter muscle, but indistinct margins can lead to inaccuracy; the easily visualized posterior teeth buds may be a better landmark.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to evaluate inter-reader variability, agreement with ultrasound, and association with postnatal outcomes using MRI to measure the inferior facial angle, jaw index by masseter muscle, and jaw index by posterior teeth buds.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A single-institution retrospective review was performed of singleton pregnancies with prenatally diagnosed micrognathia by ultrasound or MRI from September 2013-June 2022. Ultrasound measurements were obtained by a maternal-fetal medicine specialist and MRI measurements by two radiologists to evaluate inter-reader variability. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis were used to assess agreement between imaging methods and logistic regressions and ROC curves to assess associations with postnatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three fetuses (median gestational age 26 weeks (IQR 22-31); 47% male (20/43)) were included. Ultrasound measurements could not be obtained for jaw index in 15/43 (35%) fetuses and inferior facial angle in 11/43 (26%); MRI measurements were obtained by at least one reader in all cases. Jaw index by teeth buds demonstrated lowest inter-reader variability (ICC = 0.82, P < 0.001) and highest agreement with ultrasound (bias -0.23, 95% CI -2.8-2.2). All MRI measurements, but not ultrasound, predicted need for mandibular distraction (inferior facial angle P = 0.02, jaw index by masseter muscle P = 0.04, jaw index by teeth buds P = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fetal MRI measurements, particularly jaw index measured by posterior teeth buds, demonstrate low inter-reader variability and high agreement with ultrasound, and may predict need for mandibular distraction postnatally.</p>","PeriodicalId":19755,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"1850-1861"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of best landmarks for calculating fetal jaw measurements by ultrasound and MRI in micrognathia.\",\"authors\":\"Bailey D Lyttle, S Christopher Derderian, Ilana Neuberger, Nicholas J Behrendt, Kaci Pickett-Nairne, Christian R Francom, Kenneth W Liechty, Mariana L Meyers\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00247-024-06032-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Micrognathia can be diagnosed in utero with ultrasound by measuring the jaw index and/or inferior facial angle, though it can be challenging due to fetal positioning. The jaw index can be measured with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using the masseter muscle, but indistinct margins can lead to inaccuracy; the easily visualized posterior teeth buds may be a better landmark.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to evaluate inter-reader variability, agreement with ultrasound, and association with postnatal outcomes using MRI to measure the inferior facial angle, jaw index by masseter muscle, and jaw index by posterior teeth buds.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A single-institution retrospective review was performed of singleton pregnancies with prenatally diagnosed micrognathia by ultrasound or MRI from September 2013-June 2022. Ultrasound measurements were obtained by a maternal-fetal medicine specialist and MRI measurements by two radiologists to evaluate inter-reader variability. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis were used to assess agreement between imaging methods and logistic regressions and ROC curves to assess associations with postnatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three fetuses (median gestational age 26 weeks (IQR 22-31); 47% male (20/43)) were included. Ultrasound measurements could not be obtained for jaw index in 15/43 (35%) fetuses and inferior facial angle in 11/43 (26%); MRI measurements were obtained by at least one reader in all cases. Jaw index by teeth buds demonstrated lowest inter-reader variability (ICC = 0.82, P < 0.001) and highest agreement with ultrasound (bias -0.23, 95% CI -2.8-2.2). All MRI measurements, but not ultrasound, predicted need for mandibular distraction (inferior facial angle P = 0.02, jaw index by masseter muscle P = 0.04, jaw index by teeth buds P = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fetal MRI measurements, particularly jaw index measured by posterior teeth buds, demonstrate low inter-reader variability and high agreement with ultrasound, and may predict need for mandibular distraction postnatally.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1850-1861\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-024-06032-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-024-06032-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of best landmarks for calculating fetal jaw measurements by ultrasound and MRI in micrognathia.
Background: Micrognathia can be diagnosed in utero with ultrasound by measuring the jaw index and/or inferior facial angle, though it can be challenging due to fetal positioning. The jaw index can be measured with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using the masseter muscle, but indistinct margins can lead to inaccuracy; the easily visualized posterior teeth buds may be a better landmark.
Objective: We aimed to evaluate inter-reader variability, agreement with ultrasound, and association with postnatal outcomes using MRI to measure the inferior facial angle, jaw index by masseter muscle, and jaw index by posterior teeth buds.
Materials and methods: A single-institution retrospective review was performed of singleton pregnancies with prenatally diagnosed micrognathia by ultrasound or MRI from September 2013-June 2022. Ultrasound measurements were obtained by a maternal-fetal medicine specialist and MRI measurements by two radiologists to evaluate inter-reader variability. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis were used to assess agreement between imaging methods and logistic regressions and ROC curves to assess associations with postnatal outcomes.
Results: Forty-three fetuses (median gestational age 26 weeks (IQR 22-31); 47% male (20/43)) were included. Ultrasound measurements could not be obtained for jaw index in 15/43 (35%) fetuses and inferior facial angle in 11/43 (26%); MRI measurements were obtained by at least one reader in all cases. Jaw index by teeth buds demonstrated lowest inter-reader variability (ICC = 0.82, P < 0.001) and highest agreement with ultrasound (bias -0.23, 95% CI -2.8-2.2). All MRI measurements, but not ultrasound, predicted need for mandibular distraction (inferior facial angle P = 0.02, jaw index by masseter muscle P = 0.04, jaw index by teeth buds P = 0.01).
Conclusion: Fetal MRI measurements, particularly jaw index measured by posterior teeth buds, demonstrate low inter-reader variability and high agreement with ultrasound, and may predict need for mandibular distraction postnatally.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the Asian and Oceanic Society for Pediatric Radiology
Pediatric Radiology informs its readers of new findings and progress in all areas of pediatric imaging and in related fields. This is achieved by a blend of original papers, complemented by reviews that set out the present state of knowledge in a particular area of the specialty or summarize specific topics in which discussion has led to clear conclusions. Advances in technology, methodology, apparatus and auxiliary equipment are presented, and modifications of standard techniques are described.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.