头颈部原发性鼻窦和皮肤肿瘤的海马体保留放射治疗

IF 2.2 Q3 ONCOLOGY Advances in Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1016/j.adro.2024.101588
Jacob Hall MD , Michael Dance MS , Benjamin Huang MD , Ethan Steele MD , Lorie Nguyen , Michael Repka MD , Xuguang Chen MD, PhD , Colette Shen MD, PhD
{"title":"头颈部原发性鼻窦和皮肤肿瘤的海马体保留放射治疗","authors":"Jacob Hall MD ,&nbsp;Michael Dance MS ,&nbsp;Benjamin Huang MD ,&nbsp;Ethan Steele MD ,&nbsp;Lorie Nguyen ,&nbsp;Michael Repka MD ,&nbsp;Xuguang Chen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Colette Shen MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Patients with primary sinonasal and cutaneous head and neck (H&amp;N) malignancies often receive meaningful radiation dose to their hippocampi, but this not a classic avoidance structure in radiation planning. We aimed to characterize the feasibility and tradeoffs of hippocampal-sparing radiation therapy (HSRT) for patients with primary sinonasal and cutaneous H&amp;N malignancies.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>We retrospectively selected patients who were treated definitively for primary sinonasal or cutaneous malignancies of the H&amp;N at an academic medical center. All received (chemo)radiation alone or adjuvantly and substantial radiation dose to 1 or both hippocampi. We created new HSRT plans for each patient with intensity modulated radiation therapy using the original target and organ-at-risk (OAR) volumes. Hippocampi were contoured based on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group guidelines and reviewed by a neuroradiologist. Absolute and relative differences in radiation dose to the hippocampi, planning target volumes (PTVs), and OARs were recorded and compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 18 sinonasal and 12 cutaneous H&amp;N primary tumors (30 patients in total). Median prescription dose was 6600 cGy (range, 5000-7440 cGy), and 14 of the 30 patients received 120 cGy/fraction twice daily, 13 of the 30 patients received 200 cGy/fraction once daily, whereas others received 180-275 cGy/fraction once daily. The relative decrease in ipsilateral hippocampal D<sub>max</sub> and D100% using HSRT was 44% (median, 2009 cGy from 3586 cGy) and 65% (median 434 cGy from 1257 cGy), respectively. There were no statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences in PTV V100%, PTV D1%, or radiation dose to other OARs between HSRT and non-HSRT plans.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>HSRT is feasible and results in meaningful dose reduction to the hippocampi without reducing PTV coverage or increasing dose to other OARs. We suggest target hippocampal constraints of D<sub>max</sub> &lt; 1600 cGy and D100% &lt; 500 cGy when feasible (without compromising PTV coverage or impacting other critical OARs). The clinical significance of HSRT in patients with primary H&amp;N tumors should be investigated prospectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 10","pages":"Article 101588"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001519/pdfft?md5=783f46d0790ba5d5231c8c37a73eaf44&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424001519-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hippocampal-Sparing Radiation Therapy in Primary Sinonasal and Cutaneous Tumors of the Head and Neck\",\"authors\":\"Jacob Hall MD ,&nbsp;Michael Dance MS ,&nbsp;Benjamin Huang MD ,&nbsp;Ethan Steele MD ,&nbsp;Lorie Nguyen ,&nbsp;Michael Repka MD ,&nbsp;Xuguang Chen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Colette Shen MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Patients with primary sinonasal and cutaneous head and neck (H&amp;N) malignancies often receive meaningful radiation dose to their hippocampi, but this not a classic avoidance structure in radiation planning. We aimed to characterize the feasibility and tradeoffs of hippocampal-sparing radiation therapy (HSRT) for patients with primary sinonasal and cutaneous H&amp;N malignancies.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>We retrospectively selected patients who were treated definitively for primary sinonasal or cutaneous malignancies of the H&amp;N at an academic medical center. All received (chemo)radiation alone or adjuvantly and substantial radiation dose to 1 or both hippocampi. We created new HSRT plans for each patient with intensity modulated radiation therapy using the original target and organ-at-risk (OAR) volumes. Hippocampi were contoured based on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group guidelines and reviewed by a neuroradiologist. Absolute and relative differences in radiation dose to the hippocampi, planning target volumes (PTVs), and OARs were recorded and compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 18 sinonasal and 12 cutaneous H&amp;N primary tumors (30 patients in total). Median prescription dose was 6600 cGy (range, 5000-7440 cGy), and 14 of the 30 patients received 120 cGy/fraction twice daily, 13 of the 30 patients received 200 cGy/fraction once daily, whereas others received 180-275 cGy/fraction once daily. The relative decrease in ipsilateral hippocampal D<sub>max</sub> and D100% using HSRT was 44% (median, 2009 cGy from 3586 cGy) and 65% (median 434 cGy from 1257 cGy), respectively. There were no statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences in PTV V100%, PTV D1%, or radiation dose to other OARs between HSRT and non-HSRT plans.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>HSRT is feasible and results in meaningful dose reduction to the hippocampi without reducing PTV coverage or increasing dose to other OARs. We suggest target hippocampal constraints of D<sub>max</sub> &lt; 1600 cGy and D100% &lt; 500 cGy when feasible (without compromising PTV coverage or impacting other critical OARs). The clinical significance of HSRT in patients with primary H&amp;N tumors should be investigated prospectively.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"9 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 101588\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001519/pdfft?md5=783f46d0790ba5d5231c8c37a73eaf44&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424001519-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的原发性鼻窦和皮肤头颈部(H&N)恶性肿瘤患者的海马经常会受到一定剂量的放射线照射,但这并不是放射计划中典型的避开结构。我们的目的是描述原发性鼻窦和皮肤头颈部恶性肿瘤患者接受海马区保留放疗(HSRT)的可行性和权衡。所有患者都接受了单独或辅助(化疗)放射治疗,并在一个或两个海马体上接受了大量放射剂量。我们使用原始靶区和危险器官(OAR)体积为每位患者创建了新的调强放射治疗计划。海马的轮廓是根据肿瘤放疗组指南绘制的,并由神经放射学家进行审核。记录并比较了海马体、计划靶体积(PTV)和OAR的放射剂量的绝对值和相对值差异。结果18例鼻窦原发性肿瘤和12例皮肤H&N原发性肿瘤(共30例患者)。处方剂量中位数为 6600 cGy(范围为 5000-7440 cGy),30 位患者中有 14 位接受了 120 cGy/次,每天两次;13 位接受了 200 cGy/次,每天一次;其他患者接受了 180-275 cGy/次,每天一次。采用 HSRT 治疗后,同侧海马 Dmax 和 D100% 的相对减少率分别为 44%(中位数为 2009 cGy,前值为 3586 cGy)和 65%(中位数为 434 cGy,前值为 1257 cGy)。HSRT与非HSRT计划在PTV V100%、PTV D1%或其他OAR的放射剂量方面没有统计学意义或临床意义上的差异。结论HSRT是可行的,能在不减少PTV覆盖范围或增加其他OAR剂量的情况下有效减少海马体的剂量。我们建议在可行的情况下,将海马目标剂量限制在 Dmax < 1600 cGy 和 D100% < 500 cGy(不影响 PTV 覆盖范围或其他关键 OAR)。HSRT对原发性H&N肿瘤患者的临床意义应进行前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hippocampal-Sparing Radiation Therapy in Primary Sinonasal and Cutaneous Tumors of the Head and Neck

Purpose

Patients with primary sinonasal and cutaneous head and neck (H&N) malignancies often receive meaningful radiation dose to their hippocampi, but this not a classic avoidance structure in radiation planning. We aimed to characterize the feasibility and tradeoffs of hippocampal-sparing radiation therapy (HSRT) for patients with primary sinonasal and cutaneous H&N malignancies.

Methods and Materials

We retrospectively selected patients who were treated definitively for primary sinonasal or cutaneous malignancies of the H&N at an academic medical center. All received (chemo)radiation alone or adjuvantly and substantial radiation dose to 1 or both hippocampi. We created new HSRT plans for each patient with intensity modulated radiation therapy using the original target and organ-at-risk (OAR) volumes. Hippocampi were contoured based on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group guidelines and reviewed by a neuroradiologist. Absolute and relative differences in radiation dose to the hippocampi, planning target volumes (PTVs), and OARs were recorded and compared.

Results

There were 18 sinonasal and 12 cutaneous H&N primary tumors (30 patients in total). Median prescription dose was 6600 cGy (range, 5000-7440 cGy), and 14 of the 30 patients received 120 cGy/fraction twice daily, 13 of the 30 patients received 200 cGy/fraction once daily, whereas others received 180-275 cGy/fraction once daily. The relative decrease in ipsilateral hippocampal Dmax and D100% using HSRT was 44% (median, 2009 cGy from 3586 cGy) and 65% (median 434 cGy from 1257 cGy), respectively. There were no statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences in PTV V100%, PTV D1%, or radiation dose to other OARs between HSRT and non-HSRT plans.

Conclusions

HSRT is feasible and results in meaningful dose reduction to the hippocampi without reducing PTV coverage or increasing dose to other OARs. We suggest target hippocampal constraints of Dmax < 1600 cGy and D100% < 500 cGy when feasible (without compromising PTV coverage or impacting other critical OARs). The clinical significance of HSRT in patients with primary H&N tumors should be investigated prospectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Advances in Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.
期刊最新文献
Benefit of Avasopasem Manganese on Severe Oral Mucositis in Head and Neck Cancer in the ROMAN Trial: Unplanned Secondary Analysis A Predictive Nomogram for Development of Lymph Node Metastasis in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Therapy Outcomes After Stereotactic Body Radiation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Child-Pugh A Versus Child-Pugh B/C Cirrhosis Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Brain Metastases and Concomitant Listeria Monocytogenes Brain Abscesses Editorial board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1