利用机器学习模型进行心电图信号分析可预测肺栓塞的存在,其准确性取决于栓塞负担

Waldemar E. Wysokinski MD, PhD, Ryan A. Meverden PA-C, Francisco Lopez-Jimenez MD, MBA, David M. Harmon MD, Betsy J. Medina Inojosa MD, Abraham Baez Suarez PhD, MS, Kan Liu PhD, Jose R. Medina Inojosa MD, Ana I. Casanegra MD, Robert D. McBane MD, Damon E. Houghton MD, MS
{"title":"利用机器学习模型进行心电图信号分析可预测肺栓塞的存在,其准确性取决于栓塞负担","authors":"Waldemar E. Wysokinski MD, PhD,&nbsp;Ryan A. Meverden PA-C,&nbsp;Francisco Lopez-Jimenez MD, MBA,&nbsp;David M. Harmon MD,&nbsp;Betsy J. Medina Inojosa MD,&nbsp;Abraham Baez Suarez PhD, MS,&nbsp;Kan Liu PhD,&nbsp;Jose R. Medina Inojosa MD,&nbsp;Ana I. Casanegra MD,&nbsp;Robert D. McBane MD,&nbsp;Damon E. Houghton MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.03.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To develop an artificial intelligence deep neural network (AI-DNN) algorithm to analyze 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) for detection of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and PE categories.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>A cohort of patients seen between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2020, from across the Mayo Clinic Enterprise with computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) and ECG performed ±6 hours was identified. Natural language processing algorithms were applied to radiology reports to determine the diagnosis of acute PE, acute right ventricular strain pulmonary embolism (RVSPE), saddle pulmonary embolism (SADPE), or no PE. Diagnostic performance parameters of the AI-DNN reported were area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A cohort of patients with CTPA report and ECG consisted of 79,894 patients including 7423 (9.3%) with acute PE, among whom 1138 patients had RVSPE or SADPE. Artificial intelligence deep neural network predicted acute PE with a modest accuracy of AUROC of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.68-0.71), sensitivity of 63.5%, specificity of 64.7%, PPV of 15.6%, and NPV of 94.5%. The AI-DNN prediction using the same algorithm for RVSPE or SADPE was higher (AUROC, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.81-0.86) with a sensitivity of 80.8%, specificity of 64.7.8%, PPV of 3.5%, and NPV of 99.5%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>An AI-based analysis of 12-lead ECG shows modest detection power for acute PE in patients who underwent CTPA, with higher accuracy for high-risk PE. Moreover, with the high NPV, it has the clinical potential to exclude high-risk PE quickly and correctly.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74127,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","volume":"2 3","pages":"Pages 453-462"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761224000336/pdfft?md5=37397978693133143ba8101acf52268a&pid=1-s2.0-S2949761224000336-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrocardiogram Signal Analysis With a Machine Learning Model Predicts the Presence of Pulmonary Embolism With Accuracy Dependent on Embolism Burden\",\"authors\":\"Waldemar E. Wysokinski MD, PhD,&nbsp;Ryan A. Meverden PA-C,&nbsp;Francisco Lopez-Jimenez MD, MBA,&nbsp;David M. Harmon MD,&nbsp;Betsy J. Medina Inojosa MD,&nbsp;Abraham Baez Suarez PhD, MS,&nbsp;Kan Liu PhD,&nbsp;Jose R. Medina Inojosa MD,&nbsp;Ana I. Casanegra MD,&nbsp;Robert D. McBane MD,&nbsp;Damon E. Houghton MD, MS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.03.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To develop an artificial intelligence deep neural network (AI-DNN) algorithm to analyze 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) for detection of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and PE categories.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>A cohort of patients seen between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2020, from across the Mayo Clinic Enterprise with computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) and ECG performed ±6 hours was identified. Natural language processing algorithms were applied to radiology reports to determine the diagnosis of acute PE, acute right ventricular strain pulmonary embolism (RVSPE), saddle pulmonary embolism (SADPE), or no PE. Diagnostic performance parameters of the AI-DNN reported were area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A cohort of patients with CTPA report and ECG consisted of 79,894 patients including 7423 (9.3%) with acute PE, among whom 1138 patients had RVSPE or SADPE. Artificial intelligence deep neural network predicted acute PE with a modest accuracy of AUROC of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.68-0.71), sensitivity of 63.5%, specificity of 64.7%, PPV of 15.6%, and NPV of 94.5%. The AI-DNN prediction using the same algorithm for RVSPE or SADPE was higher (AUROC, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.81-0.86) with a sensitivity of 80.8%, specificity of 64.7.8%, PPV of 3.5%, and NPV of 99.5%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>An AI-based analysis of 12-lead ECG shows modest detection power for acute PE in patients who underwent CTPA, with higher accuracy for high-risk PE. Moreover, with the high NPV, it has the clinical potential to exclude high-risk PE quickly and correctly.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 453-462\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761224000336/pdfft?md5=37397978693133143ba8101acf52268a&pid=1-s2.0-S2949761224000336-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761224000336\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761224000336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标开发一种人工智能深度神经网络 (AI-DNN) 算法,用于分析 12 导联心电图 (ECG),以检测急性肺栓塞 (PE) 和 PE 的类别。患者和方法确定了 1999 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间在梅奥诊所企业内就诊的患者队列,这些患者在 6 小时内进行了计算机断层扫描肺血管造影 (CTPA) 和心电图检查。将自然语言处理算法应用于放射学报告,以确定急性 PE、急性右心室劳损性肺栓塞 (RVSPE)、鞍状肺栓塞 (SADPE) 或无 PE 的诊断。报告的人工智能深度神经网络的诊断性能参数包括接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)、灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。结果有 CTPA 报告和心电图的患者队列包括 79894 名患者,其中 7423 人(9.3%)患有急性 PE,1138 人患有 RVSPE 或 SADPE。人工智能深度神经网络预测急性 PE 的准确率为 0.69(95% CI,0.68-0.71),灵敏度为 63.5%,特异度为 64.7%,PPV 为 15.6%,NPV 为 94.5%。结论 基于人工智能的 12 导联心电图分析显示,对接受 CTPA 患者的急性 PE 有一定的检测能力,对高危 PE 的准确性更高。此外,由于 NPV 较高,它在临床上具有快速、正确排除高危 PE 的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Electrocardiogram Signal Analysis With a Machine Learning Model Predicts the Presence of Pulmonary Embolism With Accuracy Dependent on Embolism Burden

Objective

To develop an artificial intelligence deep neural network (AI-DNN) algorithm to analyze 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) for detection of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and PE categories.

Patients and Methods

A cohort of patients seen between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2020, from across the Mayo Clinic Enterprise with computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) and ECG performed ±6 hours was identified. Natural language processing algorithms were applied to radiology reports to determine the diagnosis of acute PE, acute right ventricular strain pulmonary embolism (RVSPE), saddle pulmonary embolism (SADPE), or no PE. Diagnostic performance parameters of the AI-DNN reported were area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).

Results

A cohort of patients with CTPA report and ECG consisted of 79,894 patients including 7423 (9.3%) with acute PE, among whom 1138 patients had RVSPE or SADPE. Artificial intelligence deep neural network predicted acute PE with a modest accuracy of AUROC of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.68-0.71), sensitivity of 63.5%, specificity of 64.7%, PPV of 15.6%, and NPV of 94.5%. The AI-DNN prediction using the same algorithm for RVSPE or SADPE was higher (AUROC, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.81-0.86) with a sensitivity of 80.8%, specificity of 64.7.8%, PPV of 3.5%, and NPV of 99.5%.

Conclusion

An AI-based analysis of 12-lead ECG shows modest detection power for acute PE in patients who underwent CTPA, with higher accuracy for high-risk PE. Moreover, with the high NPV, it has the clinical potential to exclude high-risk PE quickly and correctly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health Medicine and Dentistry (General), Health Informatics, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊最新文献
Developing a Research Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Strategic Considerations for Selecting Artificial Intelligence Solutions for Institutional Integration: A Single-Center Experience Reviewers for Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health (2024) A Blueprint for Clinical-Driven Medical Device Development: The Feverkidstool Application to Identify Children With Serious Bacterial Infection Cost-Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiograms for Early Detection of Low Ejection Fraction: A Secondary Analysis of the Electrocardiogram Artificial Intelligence-Guided Screening for Low Ejection Fraction Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1