非等位肾脏分配的当代流行与实践模式。

IF 8.9 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American Journal of Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1016/j.ajt.2024.08.016
Luckmini N Liyanage, Daniyar Akizhanov, Suhani S Patel, Dorry L Segev, Allan B Massie, Darren E Stewart, Sommer E Gentry
{"title":"非等位肾脏分配的当代流行与实践模式。","authors":"Luckmini N Liyanage, Daniyar Akizhanov, Suhani S Patel, Dorry L Segev, Allan B Massie, Darren E Stewart, Sommer E Gentry","doi":"10.1016/j.ajt.2024.08.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since 2021, the OPTN has reported a nearly 10-fold rise in out-of-sequence (OOS) kidney allocation, generating concern and halting development of continuous distribution policies. We report contemporary (2022-2023) practice patterns in OOS allocation using OPTN data. We examined in sequence vs. OOS donors with multivariable logistic regression and skipped vs. OOS-accepting recipients with conditional logistic regression. Nearly 20% of kidney placements were OOS, varying from 0% to 43% across OPOs; the 5 highest-OOS OPOs accounted for 29% of all OOS. Of OOS kidneys, 33% were declined >100 times in the standard allocation sequence and 51% were declined by >10 centers before OOS allocation began; 4.5% were made without any in-sequence declines. Nearly all OOS offers were open offers. OOS kidneys were more likely to be from female, Black, older, DCD, hypertensive, diabetic, and elevated creatinine donors. Candidates receiving OOS kidneys were more likely female, Asian, and older than skipped candidates. Higher-volume centers and centers with more White, fewer Hispanic, and more educated waiting list patients transplanted disproportionately more OOS kidneys. These findings suggest that the current, highly variable, discretionary use of OOS might exacerbate disparities, yet the impact of OOS on organ utilization cannot be determined with data now collected.</p>","PeriodicalId":123,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contemporary Prevalence and Practice Patterns of Out-of-Sequence Kidney Allocation.\",\"authors\":\"Luckmini N Liyanage, Daniyar Akizhanov, Suhani S Patel, Dorry L Segev, Allan B Massie, Darren E Stewart, Sommer E Gentry\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajt.2024.08.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Since 2021, the OPTN has reported a nearly 10-fold rise in out-of-sequence (OOS) kidney allocation, generating concern and halting development of continuous distribution policies. We report contemporary (2022-2023) practice patterns in OOS allocation using OPTN data. We examined in sequence vs. OOS donors with multivariable logistic regression and skipped vs. OOS-accepting recipients with conditional logistic regression. Nearly 20% of kidney placements were OOS, varying from 0% to 43% across OPOs; the 5 highest-OOS OPOs accounted for 29% of all OOS. Of OOS kidneys, 33% were declined >100 times in the standard allocation sequence and 51% were declined by >10 centers before OOS allocation began; 4.5% were made without any in-sequence declines. Nearly all OOS offers were open offers. OOS kidneys were more likely to be from female, Black, older, DCD, hypertensive, diabetic, and elevated creatinine donors. Candidates receiving OOS kidneys were more likely female, Asian, and older than skipped candidates. Higher-volume centers and centers with more White, fewer Hispanic, and more educated waiting list patients transplanted disproportionately more OOS kidneys. These findings suggest that the current, highly variable, discretionary use of OOS might exacerbate disparities, yet the impact of OOS on organ utilization cannot be determined with data now collected.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Transplantation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajt.2024.08.016\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajt.2024.08.016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自 2021 年以来,OPTN 报告的顺序外(OOS)肾脏分配增加了近 10 倍,引起了人们的关注,并阻碍了连续分配政策的发展。我们利用 OPTN 的数据报告了当代(2022-2023 年)OOS 分配的实践模式。我们通过多变量逻辑回归研究了顺序捐献者与OOS捐献者的关系,并通过条件逻辑回归研究了跳过捐献者与接受OOS捐献者的关系。近20%的肾脏配售为OOS,各OPO的OOS率从0%到43%不等;OOS率最高的5个OPO占所有OOS的29%。在 OOS 肾脏中,33% 的肾脏在标准分配序列中被拒绝超过 100 次,51% 的肾脏在 OOS 分配开始前被超过 10 个中心拒绝;4.5% 的肾脏在标准分配序列中未被任何中心拒绝。几乎所有的 OOS 供肾都是公开供肾。OOS肾更可能来自女性、黑人、老年人、DCD、高血压、糖尿病和肌酐升高的供体。接受 OOS 肾脏的候选者中,女性、亚裔和老年人的比例高于跳过的候选者。数量较多的中心以及白人较多、西班牙裔较少和受教育程度较高的候选者中心移植的OOS肾脏数量多得不成比例。这些研究结果表明,目前随意使用OOS的情况非常多变,可能会加剧差异,但目前收集的数据还无法确定OOS对器官利用率的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contemporary Prevalence and Practice Patterns of Out-of-Sequence Kidney Allocation.

Since 2021, the OPTN has reported a nearly 10-fold rise in out-of-sequence (OOS) kidney allocation, generating concern and halting development of continuous distribution policies. We report contemporary (2022-2023) practice patterns in OOS allocation using OPTN data. We examined in sequence vs. OOS donors with multivariable logistic regression and skipped vs. OOS-accepting recipients with conditional logistic regression. Nearly 20% of kidney placements were OOS, varying from 0% to 43% across OPOs; the 5 highest-OOS OPOs accounted for 29% of all OOS. Of OOS kidneys, 33% were declined >100 times in the standard allocation sequence and 51% were declined by >10 centers before OOS allocation began; 4.5% were made without any in-sequence declines. Nearly all OOS offers were open offers. OOS kidneys were more likely to be from female, Black, older, DCD, hypertensive, diabetic, and elevated creatinine donors. Candidates receiving OOS kidneys were more likely female, Asian, and older than skipped candidates. Higher-volume centers and centers with more White, fewer Hispanic, and more educated waiting list patients transplanted disproportionately more OOS kidneys. These findings suggest that the current, highly variable, discretionary use of OOS might exacerbate disparities, yet the impact of OOS on organ utilization cannot be determined with data now collected.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Transplantation is a leading journal in the field of transplantation. It serves as a forum for debate and reassessment, an agent of change, and a major platform for promoting understanding, improving results, and advancing science. Published monthly, it provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians worldwide. The journal publishes original articles, case reports, invited reviews, letters to the editor, critical reviews, news features, consensus documents, and guidelines over 12 issues a year. It covers all major subject areas in transplantation, including thoracic (heart, lung), abdominal (kidney, liver, pancreas, islets), tissue and stem cell transplantation, organ and tissue donation and preservation, tissue injury, repair, inflammation, and aging, histocompatibility, drugs and pharmacology, graft survival, and prevention of graft dysfunction and failure. It also explores ethical and social issues in the field.
期刊最新文献
The Dangerous Precedent of Censoring Scientific Dissemination. Updated Seasonal Influenza and RSV Vaccine Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices - 2024. Outside Front Cover The hepatocyte growth factor mimetic, ANG-3777, in kidney transplant recipients with delayed graft function: Results from a randomized phase 3 trial Morning administration enhances humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in kidney transplant recipients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1