加强视频辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术围手术期患者术后恢复的临床效果。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annali italiani di chirurgia Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62713/aic.3386
Yinhui Xu, Guanghui Liang, Wei Wang, Wenqun Xing, Junxiao Liu
{"title":"加强视频辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术围手术期患者术后恢复的临床效果。","authors":"Yinhui Xu, Guanghui Liang, Wei Wang, Wenqun Xing, Junxiao Liu","doi":"10.62713/aic.3386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines provide significant benefits for patients after surgery. Care bundles combine various evidence-based treatments and care measures for managing refractory clinical diseases. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the ERAS measures and care bundles to reduce post-operative complications associated with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy and promote patients' recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As a retrospective study, this study included 120 non-small cell lung carcinoma patients, who were divided into a control group and an observation group according to the post-operative care methods of the patients in the medical record system. Among them, sixty patients, admitted from January 2018 to January 2019, were included in the control group, and 60 patients, admitted from January 2022 to January 2023, were included in the observation group. The control group received routine care (non-ERAS group), and the observation group followed the bundles of care strategy based on ERAS guidelines (ERAS group). Data collected included baseline characteristics, clinical parameters, and post-operative parameters of patients in the ERAS and non-ERAS groups. The clinical data of all patients came from the hospital medical record system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in gender, age, tumor node metastasis (TNM) stages, smoking, and drinking between the ERAS and non-ERAS groups (p > 0.05). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in Cardiac Ejection fraction (≥50%), forced expiratory volume in 1 sec % (FEV1%) forced vital capacity (FVC), Lymphocyte, Neutrophils (%), and Tumor diameter between the ERAS and non-ERAS groups (p > 0.05). In contrast, significant differences were found in FVC, FEV1%, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide single breath (DLCO SB), Albumin, C-reactive protein, Leukocyte, Monocytes, Lymphocyte (%), Hemoglobin, and Neutrophils between the ERAS and non-ERAS groups (p < 0.05). Furthermore, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that Leukocytes, DLCO, C-reactive protein (CRP), FEV1%, Monocytes, Lymphocytes (%), Neutrophils (%), and Body Mass Index (BMI) were essential predictors of ERAS. Using cutoff values of Leukocytes >12.5, FEV1% >112.9, Monocytes >16.8 (109/L), and Neutrophils >11.6, patients undergoing VATS lobectomy were more likely to experience a quick recover. When ERAS measures integrated bundles of care, the extubation time can reduced to less than 5.5 days, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score to less than 3.5, and the post-operative hospital stay to less than 10.5 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ERAS management measures based on bundles of care can significantly improve the prognosis of patients undergoing VATS lobectomy, reduce post-operative complications, and accelerate safe rehabilitation. Furthermore, they can greatly shorten hospital stays, lower overall healthcare costs, and alleviate social and family burdens. These significant differences may be related to factors such as Leukocytes, FEV1%, Monocytes, and Neutrophils.</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":"95 4","pages":"583-592"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Effects of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Perioperative Period Patients with Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Yinhui Xu, Guanghui Liang, Wei Wang, Wenqun Xing, Junxiao Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.62713/aic.3386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines provide significant benefits for patients after surgery. Care bundles combine various evidence-based treatments and care measures for managing refractory clinical diseases. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the ERAS measures and care bundles to reduce post-operative complications associated with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy and promote patients' recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As a retrospective study, this study included 120 non-small cell lung carcinoma patients, who were divided into a control group and an observation group according to the post-operative care methods of the patients in the medical record system. Among them, sixty patients, admitted from January 2018 to January 2019, were included in the control group, and 60 patients, admitted from January 2022 to January 2023, were included in the observation group. The control group received routine care (non-ERAS group), and the observation group followed the bundles of care strategy based on ERAS guidelines (ERAS group). Data collected included baseline characteristics, clinical parameters, and post-operative parameters of patients in the ERAS and non-ERAS groups. The clinical data of all patients came from the hospital medical record system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in gender, age, tumor node metastasis (TNM) stages, smoking, and drinking between the ERAS and non-ERAS groups (p > 0.05). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in Cardiac Ejection fraction (≥50%), forced expiratory volume in 1 sec % (FEV1%) forced vital capacity (FVC), Lymphocyte, Neutrophils (%), and Tumor diameter between the ERAS and non-ERAS groups (p > 0.05). In contrast, significant differences were found in FVC, FEV1%, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide single breath (DLCO SB), Albumin, C-reactive protein, Leukocyte, Monocytes, Lymphocyte (%), Hemoglobin, and Neutrophils between the ERAS and non-ERAS groups (p < 0.05). Furthermore, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that Leukocytes, DLCO, C-reactive protein (CRP), FEV1%, Monocytes, Lymphocytes (%), Neutrophils (%), and Body Mass Index (BMI) were essential predictors of ERAS. Using cutoff values of Leukocytes >12.5, FEV1% >112.9, Monocytes >16.8 (109/L), and Neutrophils >11.6, patients undergoing VATS lobectomy were more likely to experience a quick recover. When ERAS measures integrated bundles of care, the extubation time can reduced to less than 5.5 days, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score to less than 3.5, and the post-operative hospital stay to less than 10.5 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ERAS management measures based on bundles of care can significantly improve the prognosis of patients undergoing VATS lobectomy, reduce post-operative complications, and accelerate safe rehabilitation. Furthermore, they can greatly shorten hospital stays, lower overall healthcare costs, and alleviate social and family burdens. These significant differences may be related to factors such as Leukocytes, FEV1%, Monocytes, and Neutrophils.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annali italiani di chirurgia\",\"volume\":\"95 4\",\"pages\":\"583-592\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annali italiani di chirurgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3386\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3386","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:加强术后恢复(ERAS)指南可为术后患者带来显著益处。护理捆绑结合了各种循证治疗和护理措施,用于管理难治性临床疾病。因此,我们旨在评估ERAS措施和护理捆绑,以减少视频辅助胸腔手术(VATS)肺叶切除术相关的术后并发症,促进患者康复:作为一项回顾性研究,本研究纳入了120例非小细胞肺癌患者,根据病历系统中患者的术后护理方法将其分为对照组和观察组。其中,60 例患者为对照组,收治时间为 2018 年 1 月至 2019 年 1 月;60 例患者为观察组,收治时间为 2022 年 1 月至 2023 年 1 月。对照组接受常规护理(非ERAS组),观察组遵循基于ERAS指南的捆绑护理策略(ERAS组)。收集的数据包括ERAS组和非ERAS组患者的基线特征、临床参数和术后参数。所有患者的临床数据均来自医院病历系统:ERAS组和非ERAS组在性别、年龄、肿瘤结节转移(TNM)分期、吸烟和饮酒方面无明显差异(P > 0.05)。同样,ERAS 组和非 ERAS 组在心脏射血分数(≥50%)、1 秒内用力呼气容积(FEV1%)、用力呼吸容量(FVC)、淋巴细胞、中性粒细胞(%)和肿瘤直径方面也无明显差异(P > 0.05)。相比之下,ERAS 组和非 ERAS 组在 FVC、FEV1%、一氧化碳单次呼吸肺弥散容量(DLCO SB)、白蛋白、C 反应蛋白、白细胞、单核细胞、淋巴细胞(%)、血红蛋白和中性粒细胞方面存在明显差异(P < 0.05)。此外,Receiver Operating Characteristic(ROC)分析表明,白细胞、DLCO、C 反应蛋白(CRP)、FEV1%、单核细胞、淋巴细胞(%)、中性粒细胞(%)和体重指数(BMI)是预测 ERAS 的基本指标。使用白细胞>12.5、FEV1%>112.9、单核细胞>16.8(109/L)和中性粒细胞>11.6的临界值,接受VATS肺叶切除术的患者更有可能快速康复。当ERAS措施与护理捆绑相结合时,拔管时间可缩短至5.5天以下,视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分可缩短至3.5分以下,术后住院时间可缩短至10.5天以下:结论:基于捆绑式护理的ERAS管理措施可显著改善VATS肺叶切除术患者的预后,减少术后并发症,加快安全康复。此外,这些措施还能大大缩短住院时间,降低总体医疗成本,减轻社会和家庭负担。这些重大差异可能与白细胞、FEV1%、单核细胞和中性粒细胞等因素有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Effects of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Perioperative Period Patients with Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy.

Aim: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines provide significant benefits for patients after surgery. Care bundles combine various evidence-based treatments and care measures for managing refractory clinical diseases. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the ERAS measures and care bundles to reduce post-operative complications associated with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy and promote patients' recovery.

Methods: As a retrospective study, this study included 120 non-small cell lung carcinoma patients, who were divided into a control group and an observation group according to the post-operative care methods of the patients in the medical record system. Among them, sixty patients, admitted from January 2018 to January 2019, were included in the control group, and 60 patients, admitted from January 2022 to January 2023, were included in the observation group. The control group received routine care (non-ERAS group), and the observation group followed the bundles of care strategy based on ERAS guidelines (ERAS group). Data collected included baseline characteristics, clinical parameters, and post-operative parameters of patients in the ERAS and non-ERAS groups. The clinical data of all patients came from the hospital medical record system.

Results: There were no significant differences in gender, age, tumor node metastasis (TNM) stages, smoking, and drinking between the ERAS and non-ERAS groups (p > 0.05). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in Cardiac Ejection fraction (≥50%), forced expiratory volume in 1 sec % (FEV1%) forced vital capacity (FVC), Lymphocyte, Neutrophils (%), and Tumor diameter between the ERAS and non-ERAS groups (p > 0.05). In contrast, significant differences were found in FVC, FEV1%, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide single breath (DLCO SB), Albumin, C-reactive protein, Leukocyte, Monocytes, Lymphocyte (%), Hemoglobin, and Neutrophils between the ERAS and non-ERAS groups (p < 0.05). Furthermore, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that Leukocytes, DLCO, C-reactive protein (CRP), FEV1%, Monocytes, Lymphocytes (%), Neutrophils (%), and Body Mass Index (BMI) were essential predictors of ERAS. Using cutoff values of Leukocytes >12.5, FEV1% >112.9, Monocytes >16.8 (109/L), and Neutrophils >11.6, patients undergoing VATS lobectomy were more likely to experience a quick recover. When ERAS measures integrated bundles of care, the extubation time can reduced to less than 5.5 days, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score to less than 3.5, and the post-operative hospital stay to less than 10.5 days.

Conclusions: ERAS management measures based on bundles of care can significantly improve the prognosis of patients undergoing VATS lobectomy, reduce post-operative complications, and accelerate safe rehabilitation. Furthermore, they can greatly shorten hospital stays, lower overall healthcare costs, and alleviate social and family burdens. These significant differences may be related to factors such as Leukocytes, FEV1%, Monocytes, and Neutrophils.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.
期刊最新文献
Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of Esophagus with Lung Metastasis: Case Report. Adrenocortical Adenoma Arising from Adrenohepatic Fusion: A Mimic of Hepatocellular Carcinoma-Case Report. Application Evaluation of Fluorouracil Intraperitoneal Perfusion Chemotherapy in Combination with Intravenous Chemotherapy in Patients after Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer. Comparison of Hem-o-lok and Endoloop for Appendiceal Stump Closure in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: An Observational Retrospective Study. Comparison of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression and Full Endoscopic Lamina Fenestration Decompression in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Unilateral Radicular Pain: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1