Short esophageal myotomy versus standard myotomy for treatment of sigmoid-type achalasia: results of an international multicenter study

Background and Aims

Patients with sigmoid-type achalasia can be challenging to treat with peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). A short myotomy improves technical success; however, outcomes have not previously been evaluated.

Methods

This was a multicenter, international, retrospective study of patients who underwent POEM with short (≤4 cm) or standard esophageal myotomy. Outcomes included clinical and technical success, procedural adverse events, and reflux rates.

Results

A total of 109 patients with sigmoid achalasia (sigmoid, n = 74; advanced sigmoid, n = 35) underwent POEM across 13 centers (short myotomy, n = 59; standard, n = 50). Technical success was 100% across both groups. Patients who underwent short myotomy had a significantly shorter mean procedure time (57.7 ± 27.8 vs 83.1 ± 44.7 minutes, P = .0005). A total of 6 adverse events were recorded in 6 patients (5.5%; 4 mild, 2 moderate); the adverse event rate was not significantly different between short and standard groups. Ninety-eight patients had follow-up data (median, 3.6 months; interquartile range, 1-14 months). Clinical success was 94% (short, 93%; standard, 95%; P = .70) and did not differ based on achalasia subtype or sigmoid achalasia severity. Twenty-one (22%) patients reported post-POEM reflux and 44% (16 of 36) had objective evidence of pathologic reflux. Rates of pathologic reflux were significantly increased in the standard versus short group (odds ratio, 18.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.0-159.0; P = .009).

Conclusions

POEM with short myotomy is effective and safe for the short-term treatment of sigmoid and advanced sigmoid achalasia. Short myotomy may lead to less reflux than standard myotomy.