大型多地点、多专科医疗机构的患者自助预约机会:患者成功自行安排(和重新安排)就诊时间的 7 个独特流程的计划说明和使用情况。

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-08-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23333928241271933
Frederick North, Rebecca Buss, Elissa M Nelson, Matthew C Thompson, Jennifer Pecina, Brian A Crum
{"title":"大型多地点、多专科医疗机构的患者自助预约机会:患者成功自行安排(和重新安排)就诊时间的 7 个独特流程的计划说明和使用情况。","authors":"Frederick North, Rebecca Buss, Elissa M Nelson, Matthew C Thompson, Jennifer Pecina, Brian A Crum","doi":"10.1177/23333928241271933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient self-scheduling of medical appointments is becoming more common in many medical institutions. However, the complexity of scheduling multiple specialties, following scheduling guidelines, and managing appointment access requires a variety of processes for a diverse inventory of self-schedulable appointment types.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 7 unique patient self-scheduling methods, we captured counts of successfully self-scheduled and completed appointments. A process map was created to show the paths of 5 different primary self-scheduling processes (new appointment self-scheduling) and 2 secondary self-scheduling processes (existing appointment self-rescheduling).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 7 unique processes that led to 733,651 successfully self-scheduled completed visits from January 1 to December 31, 2023 at a multisite, multispecialty clinic. The self-scheduling processes consisted of the following: (1) Ticket offer (appointment \"ticket\" offers for specific visits generated by a provider order or system rules), the software \"ticket\" sent to the patient permits \"admission\" to self-schedule calendar templates (341,591 uses, 46.6%); (2) direct self-scheduled visit for prequalified visit types (203,593 uses, 27.6%); (3) self-reschedule option (patient option to reschedule existing appointment, 79,706 uses, 10.9%); (4) new patient self-scheduled visit via clinic website (does not require portal access, 54,367 uses, 7.4%). (5) automated waitlist self-rescheduled visit (38,649 uses, 5.3%); (6) automated waitlist self-scheduled visit of previously unscheduled visit (10,939 uses, 1.5%); and (7) self-triage self-scheduled visit (4806 uses, 0.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The processes for self-scheduling are expanding. Our multispecialty clinic has implemented 7 different processes to help patients successfully self-schedule medical appointments. Some of the processes occur before initial scheduling (such as self-triage), and some are implemented after successful scheduling has already occurred (self-rescheduling option and self-rescheduling aided by an automated waitlist). Continued research is needed to look for measures of success beyond the ability to complete a self-scheduled visit, including the accuracy of the booking (right provider, location, and length of visit).</p>","PeriodicalId":12951,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology","volume":"11 ","pages":"23333928241271933"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11342323/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Opportunities to Self-Schedule in a Large Multisite, Multispecialty Medical Practice: Program Description and Uptake of 7 Unique Processes for Patients to Successfully Self-Schedule (and Reschedule) Their Medical Appointments.\",\"authors\":\"Frederick North, Rebecca Buss, Elissa M Nelson, Matthew C Thompson, Jennifer Pecina, Brian A Crum\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23333928241271933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient self-scheduling of medical appointments is becoming more common in many medical institutions. However, the complexity of scheduling multiple specialties, following scheduling guidelines, and managing appointment access requires a variety of processes for a diverse inventory of self-schedulable appointment types.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 7 unique patient self-scheduling methods, we captured counts of successfully self-scheduled and completed appointments. A process map was created to show the paths of 5 different primary self-scheduling processes (new appointment self-scheduling) and 2 secondary self-scheduling processes (existing appointment self-rescheduling).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 7 unique processes that led to 733,651 successfully self-scheduled completed visits from January 1 to December 31, 2023 at a multisite, multispecialty clinic. The self-scheduling processes consisted of the following: (1) Ticket offer (appointment \\\"ticket\\\" offers for specific visits generated by a provider order or system rules), the software \\\"ticket\\\" sent to the patient permits \\\"admission\\\" to self-schedule calendar templates (341,591 uses, 46.6%); (2) direct self-scheduled visit for prequalified visit types (203,593 uses, 27.6%); (3) self-reschedule option (patient option to reschedule existing appointment, 79,706 uses, 10.9%); (4) new patient self-scheduled visit via clinic website (does not require portal access, 54,367 uses, 7.4%). (5) automated waitlist self-rescheduled visit (38,649 uses, 5.3%); (6) automated waitlist self-scheduled visit of previously unscheduled visit (10,939 uses, 1.5%); and (7) self-triage self-scheduled visit (4806 uses, 0.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The processes for self-scheduling are expanding. Our multispecialty clinic has implemented 7 different processes to help patients successfully self-schedule medical appointments. Some of the processes occur before initial scheduling (such as self-triage), and some are implemented after successful scheduling has already occurred (self-rescheduling option and self-rescheduling aided by an automated waitlist). Continued research is needed to look for measures of success beyond the ability to complete a self-scheduled visit, including the accuracy of the booking (right provider, location, and length of visit).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"23333928241271933\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11342323/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23333928241271933\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23333928241271933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介在许多医疗机构,病人自行安排医疗预约越来越普遍。然而,安排多个专科、遵循安排指南以及管理预约访问的复杂性要求对各种可自行安排的预约类型进行不同的处理:方法:我们从 7 种独特的患者自助排期方法中获取了成功自助排期和完成预约的次数。我们绘制了一张流程图,以显示 5 个不同的主要自行安排流程(新预约自行安排)和 2 个辅助自行安排流程(现有预约自行安排)的路径:结果:从 2023 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日,在一家多地点、多专科诊所中,共有 7 个独特的流程导致 733 651 人次成功完成了自主预约就诊。自助预约流程包括以下内容:(1) 票据提议(由医疗服务提供者订单或系统规则生成的特定就诊预约 "票据 "提议),发送给患者的软件 "票据 "允许 "入场 "自行安排日历模板(341,591 次使用,占 46.6%);(2) 对预审合格的就诊类型直接进行自我预约就诊(203,593 次使用,27.6%);(3) 自我重新安排选项(患者可选择重新安排现有预约,79,706 次使用,10.9%);(4) 新患者通过诊所网站进行自我预约就诊(不需要访问门户网站,54,367 次使用,7.4%)。(5)自动等待名单自行排期就诊(38649 次,5.3%);(6)自动等待名单自行排期之前未排期的就诊(10939 次,1.5%);(7)自行分流自行排期就诊(4806 次,0.7%):结论:自我安排就诊的流程正在不断扩大。我们的多专科诊所已经实施了 7 种不同的流程,帮助患者成功自助预约就诊。其中一些流程发生在首次预约之前(如自我分诊),而另一些流程则是在成功预约之后实施的(自我重新安排选项和在自动候诊名单辅助下的自我重新安排)。需要继续开展研究,以寻找除完成自助预约就诊能力之外的成功衡量标准,包括预约的准确性(正确的医疗服务提供者、地点和就诊时间)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient Opportunities to Self-Schedule in a Large Multisite, Multispecialty Medical Practice: Program Description and Uptake of 7 Unique Processes for Patients to Successfully Self-Schedule (and Reschedule) Their Medical Appointments.

Introduction: Patient self-scheduling of medical appointments is becoming more common in many medical institutions. However, the complexity of scheduling multiple specialties, following scheduling guidelines, and managing appointment access requires a variety of processes for a diverse inventory of self-schedulable appointment types.

Methods: From 7 unique patient self-scheduling methods, we captured counts of successfully self-scheduled and completed appointments. A process map was created to show the paths of 5 different primary self-scheduling processes (new appointment self-scheduling) and 2 secondary self-scheduling processes (existing appointment self-rescheduling).

Results: There were 7 unique processes that led to 733,651 successfully self-scheduled completed visits from January 1 to December 31, 2023 at a multisite, multispecialty clinic. The self-scheduling processes consisted of the following: (1) Ticket offer (appointment "ticket" offers for specific visits generated by a provider order or system rules), the software "ticket" sent to the patient permits "admission" to self-schedule calendar templates (341,591 uses, 46.6%); (2) direct self-scheduled visit for prequalified visit types (203,593 uses, 27.6%); (3) self-reschedule option (patient option to reschedule existing appointment, 79,706 uses, 10.9%); (4) new patient self-scheduled visit via clinic website (does not require portal access, 54,367 uses, 7.4%). (5) automated waitlist self-rescheduled visit (38,649 uses, 5.3%); (6) automated waitlist self-scheduled visit of previously unscheduled visit (10,939 uses, 1.5%); and (7) self-triage self-scheduled visit (4806 uses, 0.7%).

Conclusion: The processes for self-scheduling are expanding. Our multispecialty clinic has implemented 7 different processes to help patients successfully self-schedule medical appointments. Some of the processes occur before initial scheduling (such as self-triage), and some are implemented after successful scheduling has already occurred (self-rescheduling option and self-rescheduling aided by an automated waitlist). Continued research is needed to look for measures of success beyond the ability to complete a self-scheduled visit, including the accuracy of the booking (right provider, location, and length of visit).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
32
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Developing a Physical Activity Program for Mothers and Their Children at Risk for Diabetes. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Healthcare Utilization among Medically Underserved Patients with Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions. Need for an Artificial Intelligence-based Diabetes Care Management System in India and the United States. Patient Opportunities to Self-Schedule in a Large Multisite, Multispecialty Medical Practice: Program Description and Uptake of 7 Unique Processes for Patients to Successfully Self-Schedule (and Reschedule) Their Medical Appointments. Analysis of Determinants of Stunting and Identifications of Stunting Risk Profiles Among Under 2-Year-Old Children in Ethiopia. A Latent Class Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1