不同的振荡模式区分了知觉分组中的分离和整合过程。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING Human Brain Mapping Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1002/hbm.26779
Gabriel Nascimento Costa, Michael Schaum, João Valente Duarte, Ricardo Martins, Isabel Catarina Duarte, João Castelhano, Michael Wibral, Miguel Castelo-Branco
{"title":"不同的振荡模式区分了知觉分组中的分离和整合过程。","authors":"Gabriel Nascimento Costa,&nbsp;Michael Schaum,&nbsp;João Valente Duarte,&nbsp;Ricardo Martins,&nbsp;Isabel Catarina Duarte,&nbsp;João Castelhano,&nbsp;Michael Wibral,&nbsp;Miguel Castelo-Branco","doi":"10.1002/hbm.26779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Recently, there has been a resurgence in experimental and conceptual efforts to understand how brain rhythms can serve to organize visual information. Oscillations can provide temporal structure for neuronal processing and form a basis for integrating information across brain areas. Here, we use a bistable paradigm and a data-driven approach to test the hypothesis that oscillatory modulations associate with the integration or segregation of visual elements. Spectral signatures of perception of bound and unbound configurations of visual moving stimuli were studied using magnetoencephalography (MEG) in ambiguous and unambiguous conditions. Using a 2 × 2 design, we were able to isolate correlates from visual integration, either perceptual or stimulus-driven, from attentional and ambiguity-related activity. Two frequency bands were found to be modulated by visual integration: an alpha/beta frequency and a higher frequency gamma-band. Alpha/beta power was increased in several early visual cortical and dorsal visual areas during visual integration, while gamma-band power was surprisingly increased in the extrastriate visual cortex during segregation. This points to an integrative role for alpha/beta activity, likely from top-down signals maintaining a single visual representation. On the other hand, when more representations have to be processed in parallel gamma-band activity is increased, which is at odds with the notion that gamma oscillations are related to perceptual coherence. These modulations were confirmed in intracranial EEG recordings and partially originate from distinct brain areas. Our MEG and stereo-EEG data confirms predictions of binding mechanisms depending on low-frequency activity for long-range integration and for organizing visual processing while refuting a straightforward correlation between gamma-activity and perceptual binding.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Practitioner Points</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Distinct neurophysiological signals underlie competing bistable percepts.</li>\n \n <li>Increased alpha/beta activity correlate with visual integration while gamma correlates with segmentation.</li>\n \n <li>Ambiguous percepts drive alpha/beta activity in the posterior cingulate cortex.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.26779","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinct oscillatory patterns differentiate between segregation and integration processes in perceptual grouping\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Nascimento Costa,&nbsp;Michael Schaum,&nbsp;João Valente Duarte,&nbsp;Ricardo Martins,&nbsp;Isabel Catarina Duarte,&nbsp;João Castelhano,&nbsp;Michael Wibral,&nbsp;Miguel Castelo-Branco\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hbm.26779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Recently, there has been a resurgence in experimental and conceptual efforts to understand how brain rhythms can serve to organize visual information. Oscillations can provide temporal structure for neuronal processing and form a basis for integrating information across brain areas. Here, we use a bistable paradigm and a data-driven approach to test the hypothesis that oscillatory modulations associate with the integration or segregation of visual elements. Spectral signatures of perception of bound and unbound configurations of visual moving stimuli were studied using magnetoencephalography (MEG) in ambiguous and unambiguous conditions. Using a 2 × 2 design, we were able to isolate correlates from visual integration, either perceptual or stimulus-driven, from attentional and ambiguity-related activity. Two frequency bands were found to be modulated by visual integration: an alpha/beta frequency and a higher frequency gamma-band. Alpha/beta power was increased in several early visual cortical and dorsal visual areas during visual integration, while gamma-band power was surprisingly increased in the extrastriate visual cortex during segregation. This points to an integrative role for alpha/beta activity, likely from top-down signals maintaining a single visual representation. On the other hand, when more representations have to be processed in parallel gamma-band activity is increased, which is at odds with the notion that gamma oscillations are related to perceptual coherence. These modulations were confirmed in intracranial EEG recordings and partially originate from distinct brain areas. Our MEG and stereo-EEG data confirms predictions of binding mechanisms depending on low-frequency activity for long-range integration and for organizing visual processing while refuting a straightforward correlation between gamma-activity and perceptual binding.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Practitioner Points</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>Distinct neurophysiological signals underlie competing bistable percepts.</li>\\n \\n <li>Increased alpha/beta activity correlate with visual integration while gamma correlates with segmentation.</li>\\n \\n <li>Ambiguous percepts drive alpha/beta activity in the posterior cingulate cortex.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.26779\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.26779\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.26779","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,人们再次通过实验和概念来了解大脑节律是如何组织视觉信息的。振荡可为神经元处理提供时间结构,并为整合跨脑区信息奠定基础。在这里,我们使用双稳态范式和数据驱动方法来验证振荡调制与视觉元素的整合或分离有关的假设。我们使用脑磁图(MEG)在模棱两可和毫不含糊的条件下研究了对视觉移动刺激的约束和非约束配置的感知频谱特征。通过 2 × 2 设计,我们能够从注意和模糊相关活动中分离出知觉或刺激驱动的视觉整合相关性。研究发现,视觉整合会调节两个频段:α/β 频段和频率较高的γ 频段。在视觉整合过程中,几个早期视觉皮层和背侧视觉区域的α/β功率增加了,而在分离过程中,分布外视觉皮层的γ波段功率出人意料地增加了。这表明阿尔法/贝塔活动具有整合作用,可能来自维持单一视觉表征的自上而下的信号。另一方面,当更多的表象需要并行处理时,γ波段的活动就会增加,这与γ振荡与知觉一致性有关的观点不符。这些调制在颅内脑电图记录中得到了证实,并且部分源自不同的脑区。我们的 MEG 和立体脑电图数据证实了束缚机制的预测,即长程整合和组织视觉处理取决于低频活动,同时驳斥了伽马活动与知觉束缚之间的直接关联。实践者观点:不同的神经生理信号是相互竞争的双稳态知觉的基础。α/β活动的增加与视觉整合相关,而γ活动则与分割相关。模棱两可的知觉会驱动后扣带回皮层中的α/β活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Distinct oscillatory patterns differentiate between segregation and integration processes in perceptual grouping

Recently, there has been a resurgence in experimental and conceptual efforts to understand how brain rhythms can serve to organize visual information. Oscillations can provide temporal structure for neuronal processing and form a basis for integrating information across brain areas. Here, we use a bistable paradigm and a data-driven approach to test the hypothesis that oscillatory modulations associate with the integration or segregation of visual elements. Spectral signatures of perception of bound and unbound configurations of visual moving stimuli were studied using magnetoencephalography (MEG) in ambiguous and unambiguous conditions. Using a 2 × 2 design, we were able to isolate correlates from visual integration, either perceptual or stimulus-driven, from attentional and ambiguity-related activity. Two frequency bands were found to be modulated by visual integration: an alpha/beta frequency and a higher frequency gamma-band. Alpha/beta power was increased in several early visual cortical and dorsal visual areas during visual integration, while gamma-band power was surprisingly increased in the extrastriate visual cortex during segregation. This points to an integrative role for alpha/beta activity, likely from top-down signals maintaining a single visual representation. On the other hand, when more representations have to be processed in parallel gamma-band activity is increased, which is at odds with the notion that gamma oscillations are related to perceptual coherence. These modulations were confirmed in intracranial EEG recordings and partially originate from distinct brain areas. Our MEG and stereo-EEG data confirms predictions of binding mechanisms depending on low-frequency activity for long-range integration and for organizing visual processing while refuting a straightforward correlation between gamma-activity and perceptual binding.

Practitioner Points

  • Distinct neurophysiological signals underlie competing bistable percepts.
  • Increased alpha/beta activity correlate with visual integration while gamma correlates with segmentation.
  • Ambiguous percepts drive alpha/beta activity in the posterior cingulate cortex.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Brain Mapping
Human Brain Mapping 医学-核医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
401
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.
期刊最新文献
Alterations of Excitation–Inhibition Balance and Brain Network Dynamics Support Sensory Deprivation Theory in Presbycusis Characterization and Mitigation of a Simultaneous Multi-Slice fMRI Artifact: Multiband Artifact Regression in Simultaneous Slices Frontoparietal Structural Network Disconnections Correlate With Outcome After a Severe Stroke Olfactory Dysfunction and Limbic Hypoactivation in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Pain-Discriminating Information Decoded From Spatiotemporal Patterns of Hemodynamic Responses Measured by fMRI in the Human Brain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1