先天性膈疝膈肌缺损的手术治疗:当代综述。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PEDIATRICS World Journal of Pediatric Surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/wjps-2023-000747
Marietta Jank, Michael Boettcher, Richard Keijzer
{"title":"先天性膈疝膈肌缺损的手术治疗:当代综述。","authors":"Marietta Jank, Michael Boettcher, Richard Keijzer","doi":"10.1136/wjps-2023-000747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Worldwide, 150 children are born each day with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), a diaphragmatic defect with concomitant abnormal lung development. Patients with CDH with large defects are particularly challenging to treat, have the highest mortality, and are at significant risk of long-term complications. Advances in prenatal and neonatal treatments have improved survival in high-risk patients with CDH, but surgical treatment of large defects lacks standardization. Open repair by an abdominal approach has long been considered the traditional procedure, but the type of defect repair (patch or muscle flap) and patch material (non-absorbable, synthetic or absorbable, biological) remain subjects of debate. Increased experience and improved techniques in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) have expanded selection criteria for thoracoscopic defect repair in cardiopulmonary stable patients with small defects. However, the application of MIS to repair large defects remains controversial due to increased recurrence rates and unknown long-term effects of perioperative hypercapnia and acidosis resulting from capnothorax and reduced ventilation. Current recommendations on the surgical management rely on cohort studies of varying patient numbers and data on the long-term outcomes are sparse. Here, we discuss surgical approaches for diaphragmatic defect repair highlighting advancements, and knowledge gaps in surgical techniques (open surgery and MIS), patch materials and muscle flaps for large defects, as well as procedural adjuncts and management of CDH variants.</p>","PeriodicalId":23823,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Pediatric Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11340723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical management of the diaphragmatic defect in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a contemporary review.\",\"authors\":\"Marietta Jank, Michael Boettcher, Richard Keijzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/wjps-2023-000747\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Worldwide, 150 children are born each day with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), a diaphragmatic defect with concomitant abnormal lung development. Patients with CDH with large defects are particularly challenging to treat, have the highest mortality, and are at significant risk of long-term complications. Advances in prenatal and neonatal treatments have improved survival in high-risk patients with CDH, but surgical treatment of large defects lacks standardization. Open repair by an abdominal approach has long been considered the traditional procedure, but the type of defect repair (patch or muscle flap) and patch material (non-absorbable, synthetic or absorbable, biological) remain subjects of debate. Increased experience and improved techniques in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) have expanded selection criteria for thoracoscopic defect repair in cardiopulmonary stable patients with small defects. However, the application of MIS to repair large defects remains controversial due to increased recurrence rates and unknown long-term effects of perioperative hypercapnia and acidosis resulting from capnothorax and reduced ventilation. Current recommendations on the surgical management rely on cohort studies of varying patient numbers and data on the long-term outcomes are sparse. Here, we discuss surgical approaches for diaphragmatic defect repair highlighting advancements, and knowledge gaps in surgical techniques (open surgery and MIS), patch materials and muscle flaps for large defects, as well as procedural adjuncts and management of CDH variants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Pediatric Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11340723/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Pediatric Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/wjps-2023-000747\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Pediatric Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/wjps-2023-000747","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全世界每天有 150 名先天性膈疝(CDH)患儿出生,这种膈肌缺陷同时伴有肺部发育异常。缺陷较大的 CDH 患者尤其难以治疗,死亡率最高,并面临长期并发症的巨大风险。产前和新生儿治疗的进步提高了高风险 CDH 患者的存活率,但大面积缺损的手术治疗缺乏标准化。腹部开腹修复一直被认为是传统的手术方法,但缺损修复的类型(补片或肌瓣)和补片材料(非吸收、合成或可吸收、生物)仍存在争议。随着微创手术(MIS)经验的增加和技术的改进,胸腔镜缺损修补术的选择标准也在不断扩大,适用于心肺功能稳定且缺损较小的患者。然而,由于复发率增加,以及帽状气胸和通气量减少导致的围手术期高碳酸血症和酸中毒的长期影响未知,MIS 在修复大缺损方面的应用仍存在争议。目前关于手术治疗的建议主要依赖于不同患者人数的队列研究,而关于长期疗效的数据却很少。在此,我们将讨论膈肌缺损修复的手术方法,重点介绍手术技术(开放手术和 MIS)、修补材料、大缺损的肌肉瓣、手术辅助工具和 CDH 变异的处理等方面的进展和知识差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Surgical management of the diaphragmatic defect in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a contemporary review.

Worldwide, 150 children are born each day with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), a diaphragmatic defect with concomitant abnormal lung development. Patients with CDH with large defects are particularly challenging to treat, have the highest mortality, and are at significant risk of long-term complications. Advances in prenatal and neonatal treatments have improved survival in high-risk patients with CDH, but surgical treatment of large defects lacks standardization. Open repair by an abdominal approach has long been considered the traditional procedure, but the type of defect repair (patch or muscle flap) and patch material (non-absorbable, synthetic or absorbable, biological) remain subjects of debate. Increased experience and improved techniques in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) have expanded selection criteria for thoracoscopic defect repair in cardiopulmonary stable patients with small defects. However, the application of MIS to repair large defects remains controversial due to increased recurrence rates and unknown long-term effects of perioperative hypercapnia and acidosis resulting from capnothorax and reduced ventilation. Current recommendations on the surgical management rely on cohort studies of varying patient numbers and data on the long-term outcomes are sparse. Here, we discuss surgical approaches for diaphragmatic defect repair highlighting advancements, and knowledge gaps in surgical techniques (open surgery and MIS), patch materials and muscle flaps for large defects, as well as procedural adjuncts and management of CDH variants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
38
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hirschsprung disease: common and uncommon variants. Role of genetics and the environment in the etiology of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Surgical management of the diaphragmatic defect in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a contemporary review. Lung-protective ventilation in the management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Efficacy of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of pulmonary sequestration in children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1