前壁额窦骨折保守治疗后的患者满意度。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2024.08.002
Marlous Marianne Beate Cardinaal , Omid Daqiq , Bram Barteld Jan Merema, Baucke van Minnen
{"title":"前壁额窦骨折保守治疗后的患者满意度。","authors":"Marlous Marianne Beate Cardinaal ,&nbsp;Omid Daqiq ,&nbsp;Bram Barteld Jan Merema,&nbsp;Baucke van Minnen","doi":"10.1016/j.jcms.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to determine patient forehead aesthetics satisfaction after conservative treatment of non-dislocated and dislocated anterior wall frontal sinus fractures.</div><div>Prospectively, patients older than 15 years of age with a frontal sinus fracture, treated conservatively between the period of 2010–2020, were analysed. The Face-Q questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction, and the fracture dimensional properties were measured using computed tomography. The results were compared with a matched non-fractured control group.</div><div>The mean total Face-Q questionnaire score was 114.77 (SD = 17.38) versus 114.23 (SD = 15.23) (research-versus control group, respectively), with a mean difference of 0.55 (SD = 4.85), which was not significant (p = 0.91). The size of impression area did not appear to have a linear relationship with patient satisfaction within the entire population (p = 0.87; r = 0.00). Presence of a scar in the fracture site was a significant predictor of patient satisfaction, contributing to 31% of the entire population's overall score (p = 0.01) and 57% in the dislocated fracture population (p = 0.003).</div><div>The conservatively treated patients’ satisfaction score was comparable to the control group. A higher satisfaction score after a conservative treatment is associated with the absence of a scar on the fracture site, even with dislocations up to 6 mm at the deepest impression point.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"52 11","pages":"Pages 1228-1234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient satisfaction after conservative treatment of anterior wall frontal sinus fractures\",\"authors\":\"Marlous Marianne Beate Cardinaal ,&nbsp;Omid Daqiq ,&nbsp;Bram Barteld Jan Merema,&nbsp;Baucke van Minnen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcms.2024.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study aims to determine patient forehead aesthetics satisfaction after conservative treatment of non-dislocated and dislocated anterior wall frontal sinus fractures.</div><div>Prospectively, patients older than 15 years of age with a frontal sinus fracture, treated conservatively between the period of 2010–2020, were analysed. The Face-Q questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction, and the fracture dimensional properties were measured using computed tomography. The results were compared with a matched non-fractured control group.</div><div>The mean total Face-Q questionnaire score was 114.77 (SD = 17.38) versus 114.23 (SD = 15.23) (research-versus control group, respectively), with a mean difference of 0.55 (SD = 4.85), which was not significant (p = 0.91). The size of impression area did not appear to have a linear relationship with patient satisfaction within the entire population (p = 0.87; r = 0.00). Presence of a scar in the fracture site was a significant predictor of patient satisfaction, contributing to 31% of the entire population's overall score (p = 0.01) and 57% in the dislocated fracture population (p = 0.003).</div><div>The conservatively treated patients’ satisfaction score was comparable to the control group. A higher satisfaction score after a conservative treatment is associated with the absence of a scar on the fracture site, even with dislocations up to 6 mm at the deepest impression point.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\"52 11\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1228-1234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010518224002300\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010518224002300","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定患者对前壁额窦非脱位和脱位骨折保守治疗后的额部美学满意度。研究对 2010-2020 年间接受保守治疗的 15 岁以上额窦骨折患者进行了前瞻性分析。采用 Face-Q 问卷评估患者的满意度,并使用计算机断层扫描测量骨折的尺寸特性。结果与匹配的非骨折对照组进行了比较。研究组与对照组的 Face-Q 问卷平均总分分别为 114.77(SD = 17.38)和 114.23(SD = 15.23),平均差异为 0.55(SD = 4.85),差异不显著(P = 0.91)。在整个人群中,压痕面积的大小与患者满意度似乎没有线性关系(p = 0.87;r = 0.00)。骨折部位有无疤痕是患者满意度的重要预测因素,占整个人群总分的 31% (p = 0.01),在脱位骨折人群中占 57% (p = 0.003)。保守治疗患者的满意度得分与对照组相当。保守治疗后较高的满意度得分与骨折部位无疤痕有关,即使脱位最深印模点达 6 毫米。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient satisfaction after conservative treatment of anterior wall frontal sinus fractures
This study aims to determine patient forehead aesthetics satisfaction after conservative treatment of non-dislocated and dislocated anterior wall frontal sinus fractures.
Prospectively, patients older than 15 years of age with a frontal sinus fracture, treated conservatively between the period of 2010–2020, were analysed. The Face-Q questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction, and the fracture dimensional properties were measured using computed tomography. The results were compared with a matched non-fractured control group.
The mean total Face-Q questionnaire score was 114.77 (SD = 17.38) versus 114.23 (SD = 15.23) (research-versus control group, respectively), with a mean difference of 0.55 (SD = 4.85), which was not significant (p = 0.91). The size of impression area did not appear to have a linear relationship with patient satisfaction within the entire population (p = 0.87; r = 0.00). Presence of a scar in the fracture site was a significant predictor of patient satisfaction, contributing to 31% of the entire population's overall score (p = 0.01) and 57% in the dislocated fracture population (p = 0.003).
The conservatively treated patients’ satisfaction score was comparable to the control group. A higher satisfaction score after a conservative treatment is associated with the absence of a scar on the fracture site, even with dislocations up to 6 mm at the deepest impression point.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
22.60%
发文量
117
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery publishes articles covering all aspects of surgery of the head, face and jaw. Specific topics covered recently have included: • Distraction osteogenesis • Synthetic bone substitutes • Fibroblast growth factors • Fetal wound healing • Skull base surgery • Computer-assisted surgery • Vascularized bone grafts
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of oral posaconazole and surgical debridement of rhino maxillofacial mucormycosis. A generalizable procedure for Brown's class Ⅱ and Ⅲ defects reconstruction with deep circumflex iliac artery flap using computer-assisted technique. Editorial Board Announcements Maxilla management in “phase II” skeletal surgery for obstructive sleep apnea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1