美国堕胎诊所对 COVID-19 的调整:计划生育协会调查数据分析。

Elizabeth Kravitz, Jessica Chen, Jessica Wu, Kira Bromwich, Nathanael Koelper, Arden McAllister, Sarita Sonalkar
{"title":"美国堕胎诊所对 COVID-19 的调整:计划生育协会调查数据分析。","authors":"Elizabeth Kravitz, Jessica Chen, Jessica Wu, Kira Bromwich, Nathanael Koelper, Arden McAllister, Sarita Sonalkar","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Analyze changes in abortion practices during the early coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Sites recruited by Society of Family Planning participated in a longitudinal descriptive analysis comprising three surveys between February and October 2020. Average monthly total and medication abortion volume was analyzed by χ<sup>2</sup> and linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total average volume of abortion services did not change among participating sites (p = 0.79). Volume and proportion of medication abortion increased over the study period (p = 0.02, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The early COVID-19 pandemic marked a shift toward medication abortion.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Our findings are interlaced in a national trend predating the Dobbs ruling, likely accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":93955,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adaptations to COVID-19 by US abortion clinics: Analysis of Society of Family Planning survey data.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Kravitz, Jessica Chen, Jessica Wu, Kira Bromwich, Nathanael Koelper, Arden McAllister, Sarita Sonalkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Analyze changes in abortion practices during the early coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Sites recruited by Society of Family Planning participated in a longitudinal descriptive analysis comprising three surveys between February and October 2020. Average monthly total and medication abortion volume was analyzed by χ<sup>2</sup> and linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total average volume of abortion services did not change among participating sites (p = 0.79). Volume and proportion of medication abortion increased over the study period (p = 0.02, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The early COVID-19 pandemic marked a shift toward medication abortion.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Our findings are interlaced in a national trend predating the Dobbs ruling, likely accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110692\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析 COVID-19 大流行初期堕胎方式的变化:分析 COVID-19 流行初期堕胎方式的变化:研究设计:纵向描述性分析,包括 2020 年 2 月至 10 月间的 3 次调查。研究地点由计划生育协会通过便利抽样的方式招募。选取的数据包括每月平均总人工流产量和药物流产量,并采用卡方和线性回归进行分析:结果:在研究期间,参与地点的平均人工流产服务总量没有变化(p=.79)。在研究期间,药物流产的数量和比例均有所增加(p=.02,pConclusion):COVID-19早期大流行标志着向药物流产的转变:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,在受访地点中,药物流产的比例有所增加。这些发现与药物流产的全国性趋势相互交织在一起,这一趋势早于多布斯裁决,并可能因 COVID-19 大流行而加速。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adaptations to COVID-19 by US abortion clinics: Analysis of Society of Family Planning survey data.

Objective: Analyze changes in abortion practices during the early coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Study design: Sites recruited by Society of Family Planning participated in a longitudinal descriptive analysis comprising three surveys between February and October 2020. Average monthly total and medication abortion volume was analyzed by χ2 and linear regression.

Results: Total average volume of abortion services did not change among participating sites (p = 0.79). Volume and proportion of medication abortion increased over the study period (p = 0.02, p < 0.01).

Conclusions: The early COVID-19 pandemic marked a shift toward medication abortion.

Implications: Our findings are interlaced in a national trend predating the Dobbs ruling, likely accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic analysis of foregoing Rh immunoglobulin for bleeding in pregnancy <12 weeks gestation. Modeling the impact of decreasing waiting period length for Medicaid sterilization: A multi-site cohort study. Ongoing contraceptive goals of patients who did not achieve desired postpartum permanent contraception prior to hospital discharge. The association of insertion methods on immediate postpartum intrauterine device expulsion rates: A retrospective cohort study. Society of Family Planning Research Practice Support: Strategies and considerations for addressing race and racism in quantitative family planning studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1