采用多功能色谱柱净化和柱前衍生化技术的液相色谱-荧光检测法测定糙米中的黄曲霉毒素总量:单实验室和实验室间验证研究。

Tomoya Yoshinari, Takahiro Watanabe, Toshihiko Takeuchi, Takahiro Ohnishi
{"title":"采用多功能色谱柱净化和柱前衍生化技术的液相色谱-荧光检测法测定糙米中的黄曲霉毒素总量:单实验室和实验室间验证研究。","authors":"Tomoya Yoshinari, Takahiro Watanabe, Toshihiko Takeuchi, Takahiro Ohnishi","doi":"10.1093/jaoacint/qsae066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aflatoxins (AFs) are toxic metabolites produced by Aspergillus spp. Because AFs are potent carcinogens in humans and animals, many countries have set regulatory limits for AFs in foods to prevent dietary exposure. From a global food safety perspective, in 2023, the Codex Alimentarius Commission established the maximum level (ML) of total AFs in certain cereals and cereal-based products, including polished rice. Therefore, validated analytical methods for AFs detection are necessary.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, an HPLC-fluorescence method coupled with multifunctional column cleanup and trifluoroacetic acid derivatization was developed for the determination of AF levels in polished rice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our method was validated in a single-laboratory study using AF-spiked materials, followed by an inter-laboratory validation study. Twelve laboratories participated in the inter-laboratory validation study, and five polished rice test samples artificially contaminated with AFs were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a single-laboratory study, the ranges of mean recoveries of AF B1, B2, G1, G2, and total AFs were 101, 100-103, 93-96, 95-98, and 97-99%, respectively. The RSDs for within-day and between-day variations were all ≤4.4%. In the inter-laboratory validation study, the RSDs for repeatability and reproducibility were from 0.7 to 2.7% and 3.3 to 8.9% for all analytes, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In response to the Codex ML and method performance criteria for AFs in polished rice, an analytical method based on HPLC-fluorescence detection was developed. All method performance parameters estimated from the test results of the single-laboratory and inter-laboratory validation studies met the criteria required by the Codex.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Single- and inter-laboratory studies for the validation of an analytical method for AF level determination in polished rice were successfully performed. This analytical method will be suitable to determine AF levels around the Codex ML set for polished rice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of AOAC International","volume":" ","pages":"953-959"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of Total Aflatoxins in Polished Rice by Liquid Chromatography-Fluorescence Detection with Multifunctional Column Cleanup and Precolumn Derivatization: Single-Laboratory and Inter-Laboratory Validation Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Tomoya Yoshinari, Takahiro Watanabe, Toshihiko Takeuchi, Takahiro Ohnishi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jaoacint/qsae066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aflatoxins (AFs) are toxic metabolites produced by Aspergillus spp. Because AFs are potent carcinogens in humans and animals, many countries have set regulatory limits for AFs in foods to prevent dietary exposure. From a global food safety perspective, in 2023, the Codex Alimentarius Commission established the maximum level (ML) of total AFs in certain cereals and cereal-based products, including polished rice. Therefore, validated analytical methods for AFs detection are necessary.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, an HPLC-fluorescence method coupled with multifunctional column cleanup and trifluoroacetic acid derivatization was developed for the determination of AF levels in polished rice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our method was validated in a single-laboratory study using AF-spiked materials, followed by an inter-laboratory validation study. Twelve laboratories participated in the inter-laboratory validation study, and five polished rice test samples artificially contaminated with AFs were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a single-laboratory study, the ranges of mean recoveries of AF B1, B2, G1, G2, and total AFs were 101, 100-103, 93-96, 95-98, and 97-99%, respectively. The RSDs for within-day and between-day variations were all ≤4.4%. In the inter-laboratory validation study, the RSDs for repeatability and reproducibility were from 0.7 to 2.7% and 3.3 to 8.9% for all analytes, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In response to the Codex ML and method performance criteria for AFs in polished rice, an analytical method based on HPLC-fluorescence detection was developed. All method performance parameters estimated from the test results of the single-laboratory and inter-laboratory validation studies met the criteria required by the Codex.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Single- and inter-laboratory studies for the validation of an analytical method for AF level determination in polished rice were successfully performed. This analytical method will be suitable to determine AF levels around the Codex ML set for polished rice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of AOAC International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"953-959\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of AOAC International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsae066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of AOAC International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsae066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:黄曲霉毒素是曲霉菌属产生的有毒代谢物。由于黄曲霉毒素是人类和动物的强致癌物,许多国家已制定了食品中黄曲霉毒素的监管限量,以防止从膳食中摄入黄曲霉毒素。从全球食品安全的角度来看,食品法典委员会于 2023 年规定了某些谷物和谷物类产品(包括糙米)中黄曲霉毒素总量的最高限量(ML)。因此,必须采用有效的分析方法来检测黄曲霉毒素:本研究开发了一种高效液相色谱-荧光法,该方法结合了多功能色谱柱净化和三氟乙酸衍生化技术,用于测定糙米中黄曲霉毒素的含量:使用黄曲霉毒素添加物对我们的方法进行了单实验室验证,随后进行了实验室间验证研究。12 个实验室参加了实验室间的验证研究,并分析了 5 个被黄曲霉毒素人为污染的糙米测试样品:在单个实验室的研究中,黄曲霉毒素 B1、B2、G1、G2 和总黄曲霉毒素的平均回收率范围分别为 101%、100-103%、93-96%、95-98% 和 97-99%。日内和日间差异的相对标准偏差均小于 4.4%。在实验室间验证研究中,所有分析物的重复性和再现性的相对标准偏差分别为 0.7% 至 2.7% 和 3.3% 至 8.9%:根据食品法典中关于糙米中黄曲霉毒素含量和方法性能的标准,开发了一种基于高效液相色谱-荧光检测的分析方法。根据单一实验室和实验室间验证研究的检测结果估算出的所有方法性能参数均符合食典要求的标准:重点:成功地进行了单个实验室和实验室间研究,以验证测定糙米中黄曲霉毒素含量的分析方法。该分析方法适用于测定食品法典委员会为糙米设定的黄曲霉毒素最高限量附近的黄曲霉毒素含量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Determination of Total Aflatoxins in Polished Rice by Liquid Chromatography-Fluorescence Detection with Multifunctional Column Cleanup and Precolumn Derivatization: Single-Laboratory and Inter-Laboratory Validation Studies.

Background: Aflatoxins (AFs) are toxic metabolites produced by Aspergillus spp. Because AFs are potent carcinogens in humans and animals, many countries have set regulatory limits for AFs in foods to prevent dietary exposure. From a global food safety perspective, in 2023, the Codex Alimentarius Commission established the maximum level (ML) of total AFs in certain cereals and cereal-based products, including polished rice. Therefore, validated analytical methods for AFs detection are necessary.

Objective: In this study, an HPLC-fluorescence method coupled with multifunctional column cleanup and trifluoroacetic acid derivatization was developed for the determination of AF levels in polished rice.

Methods: Our method was validated in a single-laboratory study using AF-spiked materials, followed by an inter-laboratory validation study. Twelve laboratories participated in the inter-laboratory validation study, and five polished rice test samples artificially contaminated with AFs were analyzed.

Results: In a single-laboratory study, the ranges of mean recoveries of AF B1, B2, G1, G2, and total AFs were 101, 100-103, 93-96, 95-98, and 97-99%, respectively. The RSDs for within-day and between-day variations were all ≤4.4%. In the inter-laboratory validation study, the RSDs for repeatability and reproducibility were from 0.7 to 2.7% and 3.3 to 8.9% for all analytes, respectively.

Conclusion: In response to the Codex ML and method performance criteria for AFs in polished rice, an analytical method based on HPLC-fluorescence detection was developed. All method performance parameters estimated from the test results of the single-laboratory and inter-laboratory validation studies met the criteria required by the Codex.

Highlights: Single- and inter-laboratory studies for the validation of an analytical method for AF level determination in polished rice were successfully performed. This analytical method will be suitable to determine AF levels around the Codex ML set for polished rice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Validation of the QuEChERSER Method for 245 Pesticides and Environmental Contaminants in Barley and Hemp by Low-Pressure GC: Comparison of Triple Quadrupole MS/MS and Orbitrap HRMS for Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis. FraMiTrACR: A Sustainable and Economical Technology for Analytical Sample Preparation. Proof of Concept: Autonomous Machine Vision Software for Botanical Identification. Influence of Talc in Polypropylene on Total Fluorine Measurements Used as an Indicator of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS). Validation of the Level 2 Modification for the Neogen® Molecular Detection Assay 2 - Salmonella Enteritidis/Salmonella Typhimurium Method for Detection of the Monophasic Variant Salmonella enterica  1,4,[5],12:-:1,2.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1