James K. Stoller , Herbert P. Wiedemann , Jacob Loke, Peter Snyder, James Virgulto, Richard A. Matthay
{"title":"特布他林与慢性阻塞性肺疾病膈肌功能:一项双盲随机临床试验","authors":"James K. Stoller , Herbert P. Wiedemann , Jacob Loke, Peter Snyder, James Virgulto, Richard A. Matthay","doi":"10.1016/0007-0971(88)90064-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We conducted a double-blind, randomized crossover trial to evaluate whether oral terbutaline (2.5 mg orally three times daily for a week) increased the force of diaphragmatic contraction in normocapnic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ten patients with moderate to severe airway obstruction completed the trial. Compared with placebo, terbutaline produced a mean increase of 5.8 cmH<sub>2</sub>O in peak inspiratory mouth pressure and a mean increase of 5.0 cmH<sub>2</sub>O in transdiaphragmatic pressure during a maximal inspiratory manoeuvre. These small changes with terbutaline failed to achieve statistical significance. Also, terbutaline failed to alter flow rates (FEV<sub>1</sub>, <span><math><mtext>V</mtext><mtext>̇</mtext><msub><mi></mi><mn>max50</mn></msub></math></span>) or patients' dyspnoea ratings using two separate clinical scales (Pneumoconiosis Research Unit Score and the Modified Dyspnoea Index). Because all observed changes in respiratory muscle strength were small and because the trial had power to detect small changes in inspiratory mouth pressures, we suggest that oral terbutaline at the dose administered in this study has little noteworthy effect on respiratory muscle strength in normocapnic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75618,"journal":{"name":"British journal of diseases of the chest","volume":"82 ","pages":"Pages 242-250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0007-0971(88)90064-2","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Terbutaline and diaphragm function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A double-blind randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"James K. Stoller , Herbert P. Wiedemann , Jacob Loke, Peter Snyder, James Virgulto, Richard A. Matthay\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0007-0971(88)90064-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We conducted a double-blind, randomized crossover trial to evaluate whether oral terbutaline (2.5 mg orally three times daily for a week) increased the force of diaphragmatic contraction in normocapnic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ten patients with moderate to severe airway obstruction completed the trial. Compared with placebo, terbutaline produced a mean increase of 5.8 cmH<sub>2</sub>O in peak inspiratory mouth pressure and a mean increase of 5.0 cmH<sub>2</sub>O in transdiaphragmatic pressure during a maximal inspiratory manoeuvre. These small changes with terbutaline failed to achieve statistical significance. Also, terbutaline failed to alter flow rates (FEV<sub>1</sub>, <span><math><mtext>V</mtext><mtext>̇</mtext><msub><mi></mi><mn>max50</mn></msub></math></span>) or patients' dyspnoea ratings using two separate clinical scales (Pneumoconiosis Research Unit Score and the Modified Dyspnoea Index). Because all observed changes in respiratory muscle strength were small and because the trial had power to detect small changes in inspiratory mouth pressures, we suggest that oral terbutaline at the dose administered in this study has little noteworthy effect on respiratory muscle strength in normocapnic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of diseases of the chest\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 242-250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0007-0971(88)90064-2\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of diseases of the chest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0007097188900642\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of diseases of the chest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0007097188900642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Terbutaline and diaphragm function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A double-blind randomized clinical trial
We conducted a double-blind, randomized crossover trial to evaluate whether oral terbutaline (2.5 mg orally three times daily for a week) increased the force of diaphragmatic contraction in normocapnic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ten patients with moderate to severe airway obstruction completed the trial. Compared with placebo, terbutaline produced a mean increase of 5.8 cmH2O in peak inspiratory mouth pressure and a mean increase of 5.0 cmH2O in transdiaphragmatic pressure during a maximal inspiratory manoeuvre. These small changes with terbutaline failed to achieve statistical significance. Also, terbutaline failed to alter flow rates (FEV1, ) or patients' dyspnoea ratings using two separate clinical scales (Pneumoconiosis Research Unit Score and the Modified Dyspnoea Index). Because all observed changes in respiratory muscle strength were small and because the trial had power to detect small changes in inspiratory mouth pressures, we suggest that oral terbutaline at the dose administered in this study has little noteworthy effect on respiratory muscle strength in normocapnic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.