新发癫痫与 COVID-19 疫苗和长期随访的关系:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsia Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1111/epi.18102
Ali Rafati, Melika Jameie, Mobina Amanollahi, Yeganeh Pasebani, Nastaran Salimi, Mohammad Hosein Feyz Kazemi, Mana Jameie, Mohammad Yazdan Pasebani, Delaram Sakhaei, Fateme Feizollahi, Churl-Su Kwon
{"title":"新发癫痫与 COVID-19 疫苗和长期随访的关系:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ali Rafati,&nbsp;Melika Jameie,&nbsp;Mobina Amanollahi,&nbsp;Yeganeh Pasebani,&nbsp;Nastaran Salimi,&nbsp;Mohammad Hosein Feyz Kazemi,&nbsp;Mana Jameie,&nbsp;Mohammad Yazdan Pasebani,&nbsp;Delaram Sakhaei,&nbsp;Fateme Feizollahi,&nbsp;Churl-Su Kwon","doi":"10.1111/epi.18102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Seizures have been reported as an adverse event of the COVID-19 vaccine. However, there is no solid evidence of increased seizure occurrence compared to the general population. This study was undertaken to investigate seizure occurrence among COVID-19 vaccine recipients compared to unvaccinated controls.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic search was made of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library up to April 9, 2024. Studies reporting seizure occurrence following COVID-19 vaccination were included. This study is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework and was conducted using random- and common-effect models. The risk of bias in the studies was evaluated by the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. The outcome of interest was new onset seizure incidence proportion compared among (1) COVID-19 vaccine recipients, (2) unvaccinated cohorts, and (3) various types of COVID-19 vaccines.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Forty studies were included, of which seven entered the meta-analysis. Results of the pooled analysis of the new onset seizure incidence (21- or 28-day period after vaccination) in 13 016 024 vaccine recipients and 13 013 262 unvaccinated individuals by pooling the cohort studies did not show any statistically significant difference between the two groups (odds ratio [OR] = .48, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .19–1.20, <i>p</i> = .12, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 95%, <i>τ</i><sup>2</sup> = .7145). Pooling four studies accounting for 19 769 004 mRNA versus 47 494 631 viral vector vaccine doses demonstrated no significant difference in terms of new onset seizure incidence between the groups (OR = 1.18, 95% CI = .78–1.78, <i>p</i> = .44, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%, <i>τ</i><sup>2</sup> = .004).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance</h3>\n \n <p>This systematic review and meta-analysis shows no statistically significant difference in the risk of new onset seizure incidence between COVID-19 vaccinated individuals and unvaccinated individuals.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of new onset seizure and COVID-19 vaccines and long-term follow-up: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ali Rafati,&nbsp;Melika Jameie,&nbsp;Mobina Amanollahi,&nbsp;Yeganeh Pasebani,&nbsp;Nastaran Salimi,&nbsp;Mohammad Hosein Feyz Kazemi,&nbsp;Mana Jameie,&nbsp;Mohammad Yazdan Pasebani,&nbsp;Delaram Sakhaei,&nbsp;Fateme Feizollahi,&nbsp;Churl-Su Kwon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epi.18102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Seizures have been reported as an adverse event of the COVID-19 vaccine. However, there is no solid evidence of increased seizure occurrence compared to the general population. This study was undertaken to investigate seizure occurrence among COVID-19 vaccine recipients compared to unvaccinated controls.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A systematic search was made of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library up to April 9, 2024. Studies reporting seizure occurrence following COVID-19 vaccination were included. This study is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework and was conducted using random- and common-effect models. The risk of bias in the studies was evaluated by the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. The outcome of interest was new onset seizure incidence proportion compared among (1) COVID-19 vaccine recipients, (2) unvaccinated cohorts, and (3) various types of COVID-19 vaccines.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Forty studies were included, of which seven entered the meta-analysis. Results of the pooled analysis of the new onset seizure incidence (21- or 28-day period after vaccination) in 13 016 024 vaccine recipients and 13 013 262 unvaccinated individuals by pooling the cohort studies did not show any statistically significant difference between the two groups (odds ratio [OR] = .48, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .19–1.20, <i>p</i> = .12, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 95%, <i>τ</i><sup>2</sup> = .7145). Pooling four studies accounting for 19 769 004 mRNA versus 47 494 631 viral vector vaccine doses demonstrated no significant difference in terms of new onset seizure incidence between the groups (OR = 1.18, 95% CI = .78–1.78, <i>p</i> = .44, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%, <i>τ</i><sup>2</sup> = .004).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Significance</h3>\\n \\n <p>This systematic review and meta-analysis shows no statistically significant difference in the risk of new onset seizure incidence between COVID-19 vaccinated individuals and unvaccinated individuals.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epi.18102\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epi.18102","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:据报道,癫痫发作是 COVID-19 疫苗的不良反应之一。然而,与普通人群相比,没有确凿证据表明癫痫发作的发生率会增加。本研究旨在调查 COVID-19 疫苗接种者与未接种对照者的癫痫发作情况:方法:对截至 2024 年 4 月 9 日的 PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus 和 Cochrane Library 进行了系统检索。纳入了报告接种 COVID-19 疫苗后癫痫发作情况的研究。本研究根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》框架进行报告,并采用随机效应和共同效应模型。研究的偏倚风险采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。研究结果是比较了(1) COVID-19 疫苗接种者、(2) 未接种者和(3) 不同类型 COVID-19 疫苗的新发癫痫发作比例:结果:共纳入 40 项研究,其中 7 项进入荟萃分析。通过汇集队列研究,对13 016 024名接种疫苗者和13 013 262名未接种疫苗者的新发癫痫发作率(接种疫苗后21天或28天)进行了汇总分析,结果显示两组之间没有任何统计学上的显著差异(几率比[OR] = .48,95%置信区间[CI] = .19-1.20,P = .12,I2 = 95%,τ2 = .7145)。将四项研究的 19 769 004 个 mRNA 剂量与 47 494 631 个病毒载体疫苗剂量进行汇总,结果表明两组在新发癫痫发作率方面无显著差异(OR = 1.18,95% CI = .78-1.78,p = .44,I2 = 0%,τ2 = .004):本系统综述和荟萃分析表明,接种 COVID-19 疫苗的个体与未接种疫苗的个体在新发癫痫发作风险方面没有统计学意义上的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association of new onset seizure and COVID-19 vaccines and long-term follow-up: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Seizures have been reported as an adverse event of the COVID-19 vaccine. However, there is no solid evidence of increased seizure occurrence compared to the general population. This study was undertaken to investigate seizure occurrence among COVID-19 vaccine recipients compared to unvaccinated controls.

Methods

A systematic search was made of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library up to April 9, 2024. Studies reporting seizure occurrence following COVID-19 vaccination were included. This study is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework and was conducted using random- and common-effect models. The risk of bias in the studies was evaluated by the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. The outcome of interest was new onset seizure incidence proportion compared among (1) COVID-19 vaccine recipients, (2) unvaccinated cohorts, and (3) various types of COVID-19 vaccines.

Results

Forty studies were included, of which seven entered the meta-analysis. Results of the pooled analysis of the new onset seizure incidence (21- or 28-day period after vaccination) in 13 016 024 vaccine recipients and 13 013 262 unvaccinated individuals by pooling the cohort studies did not show any statistically significant difference between the two groups (odds ratio [OR] = .48, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .19–1.20, p = .12, I2 = 95%, τ2 = .7145). Pooling four studies accounting for 19 769 004 mRNA versus 47 494 631 viral vector vaccine doses demonstrated no significant difference in terms of new onset seizure incidence between the groups (OR = 1.18, 95% CI = .78–1.78, p = .44, I2 = 0%, τ2 = .004).

Significance

This systematic review and meta-analysis shows no statistically significant difference in the risk of new onset seizure incidence between COVID-19 vaccinated individuals and unvaccinated individuals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
期刊最新文献
Histopathological substrate of increased T2 signal in the anterior temporal lobe white matter in temporal lobe epilepsy associated with hippocampal sclerosis. Imaging blood-brain barrier dysfunction in drug-resistant epilepsy: A multi-center feasibility study. Long-term neuroplasticity in language networks after anterior temporal lobe resection. Eating habits and behaviors in children with Dravet syndrome: A case-control study. Machine learning for forecasting initial seizure onset in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1