对特种作战部队牧师团队为预防、干预和事后预防自杀而建立关系的定性研究。

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychological Services Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1037/ser0000894
Su Yeon Lee-Tauler, Joseph Grammer, Eric Ekman, Jessica LaCroix, Marjan Ghahramanlou-Holloway
{"title":"对特种作战部队牧师团队为预防、干预和事后预防自杀而建立关系的定性研究。","authors":"Su Yeon Lee-Tauler, Joseph Grammer, Eric Ekman, Jessica LaCroix, Marjan Ghahramanlou-Holloway","doi":"10.1037/ser0000894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The U.S. special operations forces (SOF) contribute to a range of complex missions and experience high operational tempo, which may result in heightened professional and personal stressors. Those who are experiencing stressors may be reluctant to seek professional mental health services due to career concerns. The chaplaincy community is at the forefront of bearing and responding to the pain of others including those at risk for suicide. As a formative step to developing a tailored suicide prevention curriculum for the U.S. SOF religious support teams (RSTs), we sought to understand SOF RSTs' common strategies for suicide prevention, intervention, and postvention. We conducted confidential interviews with SOF RSTs via telephone and in person. We used an inductive thematic analysis to code a total of 57 transcripts. SOF RSTs prominently expressed that building relationships with SOF community members was foundational to their suicide prevention, intervention, and postvention practices: (a) Suicide prevention involved being available and cultivating a community of insiders who can provide resources as needed prior to crisis escalation; (b) Suicide intervention involved listening and responding to suicide risk and building autonomy for a suicidal SOF member to seek outside help; (c) Suicide postvention involved reaching out to suicide-loss survivors and grieving together through memorial services. The salient theme of building relationships points to opportunities to capitalize on RSTs' social connections and to enhance skills and resources for military suicide prevention, intervention, and postvention practices. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A qualitative study of special operations forces chaplaincy teams' relationship building for suicide prevention, intervention, and postvention.\",\"authors\":\"Su Yeon Lee-Tauler, Joseph Grammer, Eric Ekman, Jessica LaCroix, Marjan Ghahramanlou-Holloway\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ser0000894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The U.S. special operations forces (SOF) contribute to a range of complex missions and experience high operational tempo, which may result in heightened professional and personal stressors. Those who are experiencing stressors may be reluctant to seek professional mental health services due to career concerns. The chaplaincy community is at the forefront of bearing and responding to the pain of others including those at risk for suicide. As a formative step to developing a tailored suicide prevention curriculum for the U.S. SOF religious support teams (RSTs), we sought to understand SOF RSTs' common strategies for suicide prevention, intervention, and postvention. We conducted confidential interviews with SOF RSTs via telephone and in person. We used an inductive thematic analysis to code a total of 57 transcripts. SOF RSTs prominently expressed that building relationships with SOF community members was foundational to their suicide prevention, intervention, and postvention practices: (a) Suicide prevention involved being available and cultivating a community of insiders who can provide resources as needed prior to crisis escalation; (b) Suicide intervention involved listening and responding to suicide risk and building autonomy for a suicidal SOF member to seek outside help; (c) Suicide postvention involved reaching out to suicide-loss survivors and grieving together through memorial services. The salient theme of building relationships points to opportunities to capitalize on RSTs' social connections and to enhance skills and resources for military suicide prevention, intervention, and postvention practices. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Services\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000894\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000894","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国特种作战部队(SOF)承担着一系列复杂的任务,并经历着高强度的作战节奏,这可能会导致职业和个人压力增大。由于职业方面的原因,承受压力的人可能不愿意寻求专业的心理健康服务。牧师团体在承受和回应他人痛苦(包括那些有自杀风险的人)方面走在前列。作为为美国特种部队宗教支持团队(RST)量身定制自杀预防课程的第一步,我们试图了解特种部队宗教支持团队在自杀预防、干预和事后预防方面的共同策略。我们通过电话和面对面的方式对 SOF RST 进行了保密访谈。我们采用归纳式主题分析法对总共 57 份记录誊本进行了编码。SOFRSTs突出地表示,与SOF社区成员建立关系是他们预防自杀、干预自杀和自杀后干预实践的基础:(a)预防自杀涉及到随时待命,并培养一个能够在危机升级前提供所需资源的内部社区;(b)自杀干预涉及到倾听和应对自杀风险,并为有自杀倾向的SOF成员寻求外部帮助建立自主权;(c)自杀后干预涉及到与自杀丧生者接触,并通过追悼会共同哀悼。建立关系这一突出主题为利用 RST 的社会关系、加强军队自杀预防、干预和后期干预实践的技能和资源提供了机会。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A qualitative study of special operations forces chaplaincy teams' relationship building for suicide prevention, intervention, and postvention.

The U.S. special operations forces (SOF) contribute to a range of complex missions and experience high operational tempo, which may result in heightened professional and personal stressors. Those who are experiencing stressors may be reluctant to seek professional mental health services due to career concerns. The chaplaincy community is at the forefront of bearing and responding to the pain of others including those at risk for suicide. As a formative step to developing a tailored suicide prevention curriculum for the U.S. SOF religious support teams (RSTs), we sought to understand SOF RSTs' common strategies for suicide prevention, intervention, and postvention. We conducted confidential interviews with SOF RSTs via telephone and in person. We used an inductive thematic analysis to code a total of 57 transcripts. SOF RSTs prominently expressed that building relationships with SOF community members was foundational to their suicide prevention, intervention, and postvention practices: (a) Suicide prevention involved being available and cultivating a community of insiders who can provide resources as needed prior to crisis escalation; (b) Suicide intervention involved listening and responding to suicide risk and building autonomy for a suicidal SOF member to seek outside help; (c) Suicide postvention involved reaching out to suicide-loss survivors and grieving together through memorial services. The salient theme of building relationships points to opportunities to capitalize on RSTs' social connections and to enhance skills and resources for military suicide prevention, intervention, and postvention practices. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
期刊最新文献
Equity and access of a civilian-based crisis response model. An evaluation of youth mental health first aid training with law enforcement officers. Implementing family-based interventions in opioid treatment programs: Preferences for method of delivery. Professional firefighters: Findings from the National Wellness Survey for Public Safety Personnel. A qualitative study of special operations forces chaplaincy teams' relationship building for suicide prevention, intervention, and postvention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1