为在家接受老年护理服务的老年人提供家庭药品审查后的健康结果。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.08.004
{"title":"为在家接受老年护理服务的老年人提供家庭药品审查后的健康结果。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The impact of Home Medicines Reviews (HMRs) on long-term health outcomes among individuals receiving long-term in-home aged care services is unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To examine associations between HMR provision and hospitalization, long-term care facility (LTCF) entry and mortality among older people receiving long-term in-home aged care services.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective cohort study included individuals aged 65–105 years from three Australian states who accessed in-home aged care services between 2013 and 2017. Using propensity score matching, HMR recipients (n = 1530) were matched to individuals who did not receive an HMR (n = 1530). Associations between HMR provision and outcomes were estimated using multivariable regression models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Over a median of 414 days (interquartile range 217–650) of follow-up, HMR provision was not associated with hospitalizations for unplanned events (subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) 1.04, 95%CI 0.96–1.14), falls-related hospitalizations (sHR 0.97, 95%CI 0.83–1.13), LTCF entry (sHR 0.97, 95%CI 0.83–1.13), or all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 0.86, 95%CI 0.72–1.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In a cohort of older people receiving long-term in-home aged care services, no differences in unplanned hospitalizations, falls, LTCF entry or mortality were observed those with HMRs compared to those that did not receive an HMR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48126,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551741124002353/pdfft?md5=a4ee005f2dccba6a7693a2642cc9d201&pid=1-s2.0-S1551741124002353-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health outcomes following provision of Home Medicines Reviews for older people receiving aged care services at home\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The impact of Home Medicines Reviews (HMRs) on long-term health outcomes among individuals receiving long-term in-home aged care services is unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To examine associations between HMR provision and hospitalization, long-term care facility (LTCF) entry and mortality among older people receiving long-term in-home aged care services.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective cohort study included individuals aged 65–105 years from three Australian states who accessed in-home aged care services between 2013 and 2017. Using propensity score matching, HMR recipients (n = 1530) were matched to individuals who did not receive an HMR (n = 1530). Associations between HMR provision and outcomes were estimated using multivariable regression models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Over a median of 414 days (interquartile range 217–650) of follow-up, HMR provision was not associated with hospitalizations for unplanned events (subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) 1.04, 95%CI 0.96–1.14), falls-related hospitalizations (sHR 0.97, 95%CI 0.83–1.13), LTCF entry (sHR 0.97, 95%CI 0.83–1.13), or all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 0.86, 95%CI 0.72–1.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In a cohort of older people receiving long-term in-home aged care services, no differences in unplanned hospitalizations, falls, LTCF entry or mortality were observed those with HMRs compared to those that did not receive an HMR.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551741124002353/pdfft?md5=a4ee005f2dccba6a7693a2642cc9d201&pid=1-s2.0-S1551741124002353-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551741124002353\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551741124002353","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:家庭药品审查(HMR)对接受长期居家养老服务的个人的长期健康结果的影响尚不清楚:目的:研究在接受长期居家养老服务的老年人中,HMR 的提供与住院、进入长期护理机构(LTCF)和死亡率之间的关系:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了澳大利亚三个州年龄在 65-105 岁之间、在 2013 年至 2017 年期间接受居家养老服务的个人。采用倾向得分匹配法,将接受居家养老服务者(n = 1530)与未接受居家养老服务者(n = 1530)进行匹配。使用多变量回归模型估算了HMR的提供与结果之间的关系:在中位数为 414 天(四分位数间距为 217-650 天)的随访中,提供 HMR 与意外事件住院(次分布危险比 (sHR) 1.04,95%CI 0.96-1.14)、跌倒相关住院(sHR 0.97,95%CI 0.83-1.13)、进入 LTCF(sHR 0.97,95%CI 0.83-1.13)或全因死亡率(调整后 HR 0.86,95%CI 0.72-1.01)无关:在接受长期居家养老服务的老年人群中,与未接受 HMR 的老年人相比,接受 HMR 的老年人在非计划住院、跌倒、进入 LTCF 或死亡率方面没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health outcomes following provision of Home Medicines Reviews for older people receiving aged care services at home

Background

The impact of Home Medicines Reviews (HMRs) on long-term health outcomes among individuals receiving long-term in-home aged care services is unknown.

Objectives

To examine associations between HMR provision and hospitalization, long-term care facility (LTCF) entry and mortality among older people receiving long-term in-home aged care services.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included individuals aged 65–105 years from three Australian states who accessed in-home aged care services between 2013 and 2017. Using propensity score matching, HMR recipients (n = 1530) were matched to individuals who did not receive an HMR (n = 1530). Associations between HMR provision and outcomes were estimated using multivariable regression models.

Results

Over a median of 414 days (interquartile range 217–650) of follow-up, HMR provision was not associated with hospitalizations for unplanned events (subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) 1.04, 95%CI 0.96–1.14), falls-related hospitalizations (sHR 0.97, 95%CI 0.83–1.13), LTCF entry (sHR 0.97, 95%CI 0.83–1.13), or all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 0.86, 95%CI 0.72–1.01).

Conclusions

In a cohort of older people receiving long-term in-home aged care services, no differences in unplanned hospitalizations, falls, LTCF entry or mortality were observed those with HMRs compared to those that did not receive an HMR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (RSAP) is a quarterly publication featuring original scientific reports and comprehensive review articles in the social and administrative pharmaceutical sciences. Topics of interest include outcomes evaluation of products, programs, or services; pharmacoepidemiology; medication adherence; direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications; disease state management; health systems reform; drug marketing; medication distribution systems such as e-prescribing; web-based pharmaceutical/medical services; drug commerce and re-importation; and health professions workforce issues.
期刊最新文献
The association between patient self-reported experiences with medication discharge counselling and hospital readmissions: A cross-sectional analysis of a population-based survey. Enhancing older Veterans' care: Insights from medication reviews and deprescribing interventions. Development and evaluation of a model to identify publications on the clinical impact of pharmacist interventions. A graphical model to make explicit pharmacist clinical reasoning during medication review. Developing and validating development goals towards transforming a global framework for pharmacy practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1