在老年股骨转子间骨折手术中应用自主呼吸联合麻醉。

IF 1.9 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Joint diseases and related surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.52312/jdrs.2024.1571
Lu Zou, Xiao-Yan Pan, Xu-Dong Xu, Yuan-Yuan Qu
{"title":"在老年股骨转子间骨折手术中应用自主呼吸联合麻醉。","authors":"Lu Zou, Xiao-Yan Pan, Xu-Dong Xu, Yuan-Yuan Qu","doi":"10.52312/jdrs.2024.1571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to investigate the feasibility and safety of combined anesthesia with spontaneous breathing in the operation of intertrochanteric fracture of femur in the elderly.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between January 2020 and January 2023, a total of 141 elderly patients (45 males, 96 females; mean age: 72.5±6.8 years; range, 65 to 87 years) who underwent proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) surgery for intertrochanteric fracture of femur were included in this single-blind, prospective, randomized-controlled study. The patients were randomly divided into three groups. Group A (experimental group) was a general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway (LMA) group preserving spontaneous breathing, Group B (control group 1) was a general anesthesia with LMA group for mechanical ventilation, and Group C (control group 2) was a tracheal intubation anesthesia group for mechanical ventilation. The differences of related indexes among the three groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean onset time of anesthesia (6.23±1.45 vs. 12.78±2.78 vs. 13.73±2.43 min), postoperative recovery time of consciousness (8.13±0.83 vs. 11.34±0.89 vs. 12.45±0.86 min), and postoperative complete awakening time (10.45±2.34 vs. 18.87±2.56 vs. 19.62±2.93 min) were significantly shorter in Group A than in Groups B and C (p<0.05). The duration of analgesic effect was longer in Group A than in Groups B and C (p<0.05). After anesthesia, the Ramsay Sedation Scale and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were significantly lower in Group A than the other groups (p<0.05). The mean Mini-Mental State Examination (MMS) scores were significantly higher in Group A than in Groups B and C (p<0.05). Hemodynamic parameters showed that blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, and cardiac index (CI) levels were significantly higher in Group A than the other groups (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study results indicate that combined anesthesia preserving spontaneous breathing is safe and feasible in the operation of intertrochanteric fracture of femur in the elderly, with faster anesthesia recovery than the mechanical ventilation group.</p>","PeriodicalId":73560,"journal":{"name":"Joint diseases and related surgery","volume":"35 3","pages":"562-573"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11411893/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of combined anesthesia with spontaneous breathing in the surgery of intertrochanteric fracture of femur in elderly patients.\",\"authors\":\"Lu Zou, Xiao-Yan Pan, Xu-Dong Xu, Yuan-Yuan Qu\",\"doi\":\"10.52312/jdrs.2024.1571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to investigate the feasibility and safety of combined anesthesia with spontaneous breathing in the operation of intertrochanteric fracture of femur in the elderly.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between January 2020 and January 2023, a total of 141 elderly patients (45 males, 96 females; mean age: 72.5±6.8 years; range, 65 to 87 years) who underwent proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) surgery for intertrochanteric fracture of femur were included in this single-blind, prospective, randomized-controlled study. The patients were randomly divided into three groups. Group A (experimental group) was a general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway (LMA) group preserving spontaneous breathing, Group B (control group 1) was a general anesthesia with LMA group for mechanical ventilation, and Group C (control group 2) was a tracheal intubation anesthesia group for mechanical ventilation. The differences of related indexes among the three groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean onset time of anesthesia (6.23±1.45 vs. 12.78±2.78 vs. 13.73±2.43 min), postoperative recovery time of consciousness (8.13±0.83 vs. 11.34±0.89 vs. 12.45±0.86 min), and postoperative complete awakening time (10.45±2.34 vs. 18.87±2.56 vs. 19.62±2.93 min) were significantly shorter in Group A than in Groups B and C (p<0.05). The duration of analgesic effect was longer in Group A than in Groups B and C (p<0.05). After anesthesia, the Ramsay Sedation Scale and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were significantly lower in Group A than the other groups (p<0.05). The mean Mini-Mental State Examination (MMS) scores were significantly higher in Group A than in Groups B and C (p<0.05). Hemodynamic parameters showed that blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, and cardiac index (CI) levels were significantly higher in Group A than the other groups (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study results indicate that combined anesthesia preserving spontaneous breathing is safe and feasible in the operation of intertrochanteric fracture of femur in the elderly, with faster anesthesia recovery than the mechanical ventilation group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Joint diseases and related surgery\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"562-573\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11411893/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Joint diseases and related surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2024.1571\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint diseases and related surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2024.1571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在探讨自主呼吸联合麻醉在老年股骨转子间骨折手术中的可行性和安全性:在2020年1月至2023年1月期间,共有141例老年股骨转子间骨折患者(男45例,女96例;平均年龄:72.5±6.8岁;范围:65至87岁)接受了股骨近端钉抗旋转(PFNA)手术。患者被随机分为三组。A组(实验组)为保留自主呼吸的喉罩气道(LMA)全身麻醉组,B组(对照组1)为机械通气的喉罩气道(LMA)全身麻醉组,C组(对照组2)为机械通气的气管插管麻醉组。比较三组相关指标的差异:结果:A组的平均麻醉起效时间(6.23±1.45 vs. 12.78±2.78 vs. 13.73±2.43min)、术后意识恢复时间(8.13±0.83 vs. 11.34±0.89 vs. 12.45±0.86min)、术后完全苏醒时间(10.45±2.34 vs. 18.87±2.56 vs. 19.62±2.93min)均明显短于B组和C组(P结论:我们的研究结果表明,联合麻醉保留自主呼吸在老年股骨转子间骨折手术中安全可行,且麻醉恢复快于机械通气组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of combined anesthesia with spontaneous breathing in the surgery of intertrochanteric fracture of femur in elderly patients.

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the feasibility and safety of combined anesthesia with spontaneous breathing in the operation of intertrochanteric fracture of femur in the elderly.

Patients and methods: Between January 2020 and January 2023, a total of 141 elderly patients (45 males, 96 females; mean age: 72.5±6.8 years; range, 65 to 87 years) who underwent proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) surgery for intertrochanteric fracture of femur were included in this single-blind, prospective, randomized-controlled study. The patients were randomly divided into three groups. Group A (experimental group) was a general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway (LMA) group preserving spontaneous breathing, Group B (control group 1) was a general anesthesia with LMA group for mechanical ventilation, and Group C (control group 2) was a tracheal intubation anesthesia group for mechanical ventilation. The differences of related indexes among the three groups were compared.

Results: The mean onset time of anesthesia (6.23±1.45 vs. 12.78±2.78 vs. 13.73±2.43 min), postoperative recovery time of consciousness (8.13±0.83 vs. 11.34±0.89 vs. 12.45±0.86 min), and postoperative complete awakening time (10.45±2.34 vs. 18.87±2.56 vs. 19.62±2.93 min) were significantly shorter in Group A than in Groups B and C (p<0.05). The duration of analgesic effect was longer in Group A than in Groups B and C (p<0.05). After anesthesia, the Ramsay Sedation Scale and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were significantly lower in Group A than the other groups (p<0.05). The mean Mini-Mental State Examination (MMS) scores were significantly higher in Group A than in Groups B and C (p<0.05). Hemodynamic parameters showed that blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, and cardiac index (CI) levels were significantly higher in Group A than the other groups (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Our study results indicate that combined anesthesia preserving spontaneous breathing is safe and feasible in the operation of intertrochanteric fracture of femur in the elderly, with faster anesthesia recovery than the mechanical ventilation group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comparison between 3D printed models and standard 2D planning in the use of metal block augments in revision knee arthroplasty. A rare mass with atypical localization: Heterotopic ossification associated with flexor hallucis longus. Anatomical medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction improves sport participation and activity levels in adolescents with recurrent patellar dislocation. Application of combined anesthesia with spontaneous breathing in the surgery of intertrochanteric fracture of femur in elderly patients. Chronic dislocations of the fourth and fifth carpometacarpal joints with successful treatment by ligament repair: A case report and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1