阵发性心房颤动患者心率变异性和心律失常的数据分析

Huayong Jin, Lijiang Ding, Binglei Li, Jianming Zhang
{"title":"阵发性心房颤动患者心率变异性和心律失常的数据分析","authors":"Huayong Jin, Lijiang Ding, Binglei Li, Jianming Zhang","doi":"10.24976/Discov.Med.202436187.147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of arrhythmia. Heart rate variability (HRV) may be associated with AF risk. The aim of this study was to test HRV indices and arrhythmias as predictors of paroxysmal AF based on 24-hour dynamic electrocardiogram recordings of patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 199 patients with paroxysmal AF (AF group) and 204 elderly volunteers over 60 years old (Control group) who underwent a 24-hour dynamic electrocardiogram from August 2022 to March 2023 were included. Time-domain indices, frequency-domain indices, and arrhythmia data of the two groups were classified and measured. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed on variables with significant differences to identify independent risk factors. A nomogram prediction model was established, and the sum of individual scores of each variable was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Gender, age, body mass index and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) did not differ significantly between AF and Control groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05), whereas significant group differences were found for smoking, hypertension, diabetes, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The standard deviation of all normal to normal (NN) R-R intervals (SDNN), standard deviation of 5-minute average NN intervals (SDANN), root mean square of successive NN interval differences (rMSSD), 50 ms from the preceding interval (pNN50), low-frequency/high-frequency (LF/HF), LF, premature atrial contractions (PACs), atrial tachycardia (AT), T-wave index, and ST-segment index differed significantly between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis identified rMSSD, PACs, and AT as independent predictors of AF. For each unit increase in rMSSD and PACs, the odds of developing AF increased by 1.0357 and 1.0005 times, respectively. For each unit increase in AT, the odds of developing AF decreased by 0.9976 times. The total score of the nomogram prediction model ranged from 0 to 110.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The autonomic nervous system (ANS) plays a pivotal role in the occurrence and development of AF. The individualized nomogram prediction model of AF occurrence contributes to the early identification of high-risk patients with AF.</p>","PeriodicalId":93980,"journal":{"name":"Discovery medicine","volume":"36 187","pages":"1610-1615"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data Analysis of Heart Rate Variability and Arrhythmia in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.\",\"authors\":\"Huayong Jin, Lijiang Ding, Binglei Li, Jianming Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.24976/Discov.Med.202436187.147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of arrhythmia. Heart rate variability (HRV) may be associated with AF risk. The aim of this study was to test HRV indices and arrhythmias as predictors of paroxysmal AF based on 24-hour dynamic electrocardiogram recordings of patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 199 patients with paroxysmal AF (AF group) and 204 elderly volunteers over 60 years old (Control group) who underwent a 24-hour dynamic electrocardiogram from August 2022 to March 2023 were included. Time-domain indices, frequency-domain indices, and arrhythmia data of the two groups were classified and measured. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed on variables with significant differences to identify independent risk factors. A nomogram prediction model was established, and the sum of individual scores of each variable was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Gender, age, body mass index and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) did not differ significantly between AF and Control groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05), whereas significant group differences were found for smoking, hypertension, diabetes, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The standard deviation of all normal to normal (NN) R-R intervals (SDNN), standard deviation of 5-minute average NN intervals (SDANN), root mean square of successive NN interval differences (rMSSD), 50 ms from the preceding interval (pNN50), low-frequency/high-frequency (LF/HF), LF, premature atrial contractions (PACs), atrial tachycardia (AT), T-wave index, and ST-segment index differed significantly between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis identified rMSSD, PACs, and AT as independent predictors of AF. For each unit increase in rMSSD and PACs, the odds of developing AF increased by 1.0357 and 1.0005 times, respectively. For each unit increase in AT, the odds of developing AF decreased by 0.9976 times. The total score of the nomogram prediction model ranged from 0 to 110.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The autonomic nervous system (ANS) plays a pivotal role in the occurrence and development of AF. The individualized nomogram prediction model of AF occurrence contributes to the early identification of high-risk patients with AF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Discovery medicine\",\"volume\":\"36 187\",\"pages\":\"1610-1615\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Discovery medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24976/Discov.Med.202436187.147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discovery medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24976/Discov.Med.202436187.147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心房颤动(房颤)是最常见的心律失常类型。心率变异性(HRV)可能与房颤风险有关。本研究旨在根据患者的 24 小时动态心电图记录,测试心率变异指数和心律失常作为阵发性房颤的预测指标:方法:共纳入199名阵发性房颤患者(房颤组)和204名60岁以上的老年志愿者(对照组),他们在2022年8月至2023年3月期间接受了24小时动态心电图检查。对两组的时域指数、频域指数和心律失常数据进行分类和测量。对差异显著的变量进行二元逻辑回归分析,以确定独立的风险因素。建立了提名图预测模型,并计算了每个变量的单项得分之和:房颤组和对照组的性别、年龄、体重指数和低密度脂蛋白(LDL)无显著差异(P > 0.05),而吸烟、高血压、糖尿病和高密度脂蛋白(HDL)有显著的组间差异(P < 0.05)。所有正常至正常(NN)R-R间期的标准差(SDNN)、5分钟平均NN间期的标准差(SDANN)、连续NN间期差的均方根(rMSSD)、距前一间期50毫秒(pNN50)、低频/高频(LF/HF)、LF、房性早搏(PAC)、房性心动过速(AT)、T波指数和ST段指数在两组之间存在显著差异。逻辑回归分析确定 rMSSD、PACs 和 AT 是房颤的独立预测因子。rMSSD 和 PACs 每增加一个单位,房颤发生几率分别增加 1.0357 倍和 1.0005 倍。心房颤动指数每增加一个单位,心房颤动的发病几率就会降低 0.9976 倍。提名图预测模型的总分范围为 0 至 110.结论:自律神经系统(ANS)在心房颤动的发生和发展中起着关键作用。房颤发生的个体化提名图预测模型有助于早期识别房颤高危患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Data Analysis of Heart Rate Variability and Arrhythmia in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of arrhythmia. Heart rate variability (HRV) may be associated with AF risk. The aim of this study was to test HRV indices and arrhythmias as predictors of paroxysmal AF based on 24-hour dynamic electrocardiogram recordings of patients.

Methods: A total of 199 patients with paroxysmal AF (AF group) and 204 elderly volunteers over 60 years old (Control group) who underwent a 24-hour dynamic electrocardiogram from August 2022 to March 2023 were included. Time-domain indices, frequency-domain indices, and arrhythmia data of the two groups were classified and measured. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed on variables with significant differences to identify independent risk factors. A nomogram prediction model was established, and the sum of individual scores of each variable was calculated.

Results: Gender, age, body mass index and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) did not differ significantly between AF and Control groups (p > 0.05), whereas significant group differences were found for smoking, hypertension, diabetes, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (p < 0.05). The standard deviation of all normal to normal (NN) R-R intervals (SDNN), standard deviation of 5-minute average NN intervals (SDANN), root mean square of successive NN interval differences (rMSSD), 50 ms from the preceding interval (pNN50), low-frequency/high-frequency (LF/HF), LF, premature atrial contractions (PACs), atrial tachycardia (AT), T-wave index, and ST-segment index differed significantly between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis identified rMSSD, PACs, and AT as independent predictors of AF. For each unit increase in rMSSD and PACs, the odds of developing AF increased by 1.0357 and 1.0005 times, respectively. For each unit increase in AT, the odds of developing AF decreased by 0.9976 times. The total score of the nomogram prediction model ranged from 0 to 110.

Conclusion: The autonomic nervous system (ANS) plays a pivotal role in the occurrence and development of AF. The individualized nomogram prediction model of AF occurrence contributes to the early identification of high-risk patients with AF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CKAP2L Plays a Pivotal Role in Colorectal Cancer Progression via the Dual Regulation of Cell Cycle and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. Fruit Acid Inhibits UV-Induced Skin Aging via PI3K/Akt and NF-κB Pathway Inhibition. Analysis of Risk Factors Associated with Organic Erectile Dysfunction in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Erectile Dysfunction. Carbamazepine Inhibits Lung Cancer Metastasis by Suppressing Chemokine Receptor 4 Expression. Clinical Application of a Big Data Machine Learning Analysis Model for Osteoporotic Fracture Risk Assessment Built on Multicenter Clinical Data in Qingdao City.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1