{"title":"DRN-CDR:利用多组学和药物特征的癌症药物反应预测模型","authors":"K.R. Saranya, E.R. Vimina","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2024.108175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cancer drug response (CDR) prediction is an important area of research that aims to personalize cancer therapy, optimizing treatment plans for maximum effectiveness while minimizing potential negative effects. Despite the advancements in Deep learning techniques, the effective integration of multi-omics data for drug response prediction remains challenging. In this paper, a regression method using Deep ResNet for CDR (DRN-CDR) prediction is proposed. We aim to explore the potential of considering sole cancer genes in drug response prediction. Here the multi-omics data such as gene expressions, mutation data, and methylation data along with the molecular structural information of drugs were integrated to predict the IC50 values of drugs. Drug features are extracted by employing a Uniform Graph Convolution Network, while Cell line features are extracted using a combination of Convolutional Neural Network and Fully Connected Networks. These features are then concatenated and fed into a deep ResNet for the prediction of IC50 values between Drug – Cell line pairs. The proposed method yielded higher Pearson’s correlation coefficient (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>r</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>) of 0.7938 with lowest Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) value of 0.92 when compared with similar methods of tCNNS, MOLI, DeepCDR, TGSA, NIHGCN, DeepTTA, GraTransDRP and TSGCNN. Further, when the model is extended to a classification problem to categorize drugs as sensitive or resistant, we achieved AUC and AUPR measures of 0.7623 and 0.7691, respectively. The drugs such as Tivozanib, SNX-2112, CGP-60474, PHA-665752, Foretinib etc., exhibited low median IC50 values and were found to be effective anti-cancer drugs. The case studies with different TCGA cancer types also revealed the effectiveness of SNX-2112, CGP-60474, Foretinib, Cisplatin, Vinblastine etc. This consistent pattern strongly suggests the effectiveness of the model in predicting CDR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10616,"journal":{"name":"Computational Biology and Chemistry","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 108175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DRN-CDR: A cancer drug response prediction model using multi-omics and drug features\",\"authors\":\"K.R. Saranya, E.R. Vimina\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2024.108175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Cancer drug response (CDR) prediction is an important area of research that aims to personalize cancer therapy, optimizing treatment plans for maximum effectiveness while minimizing potential negative effects. Despite the advancements in Deep learning techniques, the effective integration of multi-omics data for drug response prediction remains challenging. In this paper, a regression method using Deep ResNet for CDR (DRN-CDR) prediction is proposed. We aim to explore the potential of considering sole cancer genes in drug response prediction. Here the multi-omics data such as gene expressions, mutation data, and methylation data along with the molecular structural information of drugs were integrated to predict the IC50 values of drugs. Drug features are extracted by employing a Uniform Graph Convolution Network, while Cell line features are extracted using a combination of Convolutional Neural Network and Fully Connected Networks. These features are then concatenated and fed into a deep ResNet for the prediction of IC50 values between Drug – Cell line pairs. The proposed method yielded higher Pearson’s correlation coefficient (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>r</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>) of 0.7938 with lowest Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) value of 0.92 when compared with similar methods of tCNNS, MOLI, DeepCDR, TGSA, NIHGCN, DeepTTA, GraTransDRP and TSGCNN. Further, when the model is extended to a classification problem to categorize drugs as sensitive or resistant, we achieved AUC and AUPR measures of 0.7623 and 0.7691, respectively. The drugs such as Tivozanib, SNX-2112, CGP-60474, PHA-665752, Foretinib etc., exhibited low median IC50 values and were found to be effective anti-cancer drugs. The case studies with different TCGA cancer types also revealed the effectiveness of SNX-2112, CGP-60474, Foretinib, Cisplatin, Vinblastine etc. This consistent pattern strongly suggests the effectiveness of the model in predicting CDR.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computational Biology and Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"112 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computational Biology and Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1476927124001634\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Biology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1476927124001634","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
DRN-CDR: A cancer drug response prediction model using multi-omics and drug features
Cancer drug response (CDR) prediction is an important area of research that aims to personalize cancer therapy, optimizing treatment plans for maximum effectiveness while minimizing potential negative effects. Despite the advancements in Deep learning techniques, the effective integration of multi-omics data for drug response prediction remains challenging. In this paper, a regression method using Deep ResNet for CDR (DRN-CDR) prediction is proposed. We aim to explore the potential of considering sole cancer genes in drug response prediction. Here the multi-omics data such as gene expressions, mutation data, and methylation data along with the molecular structural information of drugs were integrated to predict the IC50 values of drugs. Drug features are extracted by employing a Uniform Graph Convolution Network, while Cell line features are extracted using a combination of Convolutional Neural Network and Fully Connected Networks. These features are then concatenated and fed into a deep ResNet for the prediction of IC50 values between Drug – Cell line pairs. The proposed method yielded higher Pearson’s correlation coefficient () of 0.7938 with lowest Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) value of 0.92 when compared with similar methods of tCNNS, MOLI, DeepCDR, TGSA, NIHGCN, DeepTTA, GraTransDRP and TSGCNN. Further, when the model is extended to a classification problem to categorize drugs as sensitive or resistant, we achieved AUC and AUPR measures of 0.7623 and 0.7691, respectively. The drugs such as Tivozanib, SNX-2112, CGP-60474, PHA-665752, Foretinib etc., exhibited low median IC50 values and were found to be effective anti-cancer drugs. The case studies with different TCGA cancer types also revealed the effectiveness of SNX-2112, CGP-60474, Foretinib, Cisplatin, Vinblastine etc. This consistent pattern strongly suggests the effectiveness of the model in predicting CDR.
期刊介绍:
Computational Biology and Chemistry publishes original research papers and review articles in all areas of computational life sciences. High quality research contributions with a major computational component in the areas of nucleic acid and protein sequence research, molecular evolution, molecular genetics (functional genomics and proteomics), theory and practice of either biology-specific or chemical-biology-specific modeling, and structural biology of nucleic acids and proteins are particularly welcome. Exceptionally high quality research work in bioinformatics, systems biology, ecology, computational pharmacology, metabolism, biomedical engineering, epidemiology, and statistical genetics will also be considered.
Given their inherent uncertainty, protein modeling and molecular docking studies should be thoroughly validated. In the absence of experimental results for validation, the use of molecular dynamics simulations along with detailed free energy calculations, for example, should be used as complementary techniques to support the major conclusions. Submissions of premature modeling exercises without additional biological insights will not be considered.
Review articles will generally be commissioned by the editors and should not be submitted to the journal without explicit invitation. However prospective authors are welcome to send a brief (one to three pages) synopsis, which will be evaluated by the editors.