滔滔不绝与徽章对 GitHub 中个人成就的探索性分析

IF 3.8 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information and Software Technology Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107561
Fabio Calefato, Luigi Quaranta, Filippo Lanubile
{"title":"滔滔不绝与徽章对 GitHub 中个人成就的探索性分析","authors":"Fabio Calefato,&nbsp;Luigi Quaranta,&nbsp;Filippo Lanubile","doi":"10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context:</h3><p><span>GitHub</span> has introduced a new gamification element through personal achievements, whereby badges are unlocked and displayed on developers’ personal profile pages in recognition of their development activities.</p></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><p>In this paper, we present an exploratory analysis using mixed methods to study the diffusion of personal badges in <span>GitHub</span>, in addition to the effects and reactions to their introduction.</p></div><div><h3>Method:</h3><p>First, we conduct an observational study by mining longitudinal data from more than 6,000 developers and performed correlation and regression analysis. Then, we conduct a survey and analyze over 300 <span>GitHub</span> community discussions on the topic of personal badges to gauge how the community responded to the introduction of the new feature.</p></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><p>We find that most of the developers sampled own at least a badge, but we also observe an increasing number of users who choose to keep their profile private and opt out of displaying badges. Additionally, badges are generally poorly correlated with developers’ skills and dispositions such as timeliness and desire to collaborate. We also find that, except for the <span>Starstruck</span> badge (reflecting the number of followers), their introduction does not have an effect. Finally, the reaction of the community has been in general mixed, as developers find them appealing in principle but without a clear purpose and hardly reflecting their abilities in the current form.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions:</h3><p>We provide recommendations to the designers of the <span>GitHub</span>platform on how to improve the current implementation of personal badges as both a gamification mechanism and as sources of reliable cues for assessing the abilities of developers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54983,"journal":{"name":"Information and Software Technology","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 107561"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924001666/pdfft?md5=7dc16813d20c4c9c7f058e8d063fcd37&pid=1-s2.0-S0950584924001666-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A lot of talk and a badge: An exploratory analysis of personal achievements in GitHub\",\"authors\":\"Fabio Calefato,&nbsp;Luigi Quaranta,&nbsp;Filippo Lanubile\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context:</h3><p><span>GitHub</span> has introduced a new gamification element through personal achievements, whereby badges are unlocked and displayed on developers’ personal profile pages in recognition of their development activities.</p></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><p>In this paper, we present an exploratory analysis using mixed methods to study the diffusion of personal badges in <span>GitHub</span>, in addition to the effects and reactions to their introduction.</p></div><div><h3>Method:</h3><p>First, we conduct an observational study by mining longitudinal data from more than 6,000 developers and performed correlation and regression analysis. Then, we conduct a survey and analyze over 300 <span>GitHub</span> community discussions on the topic of personal badges to gauge how the community responded to the introduction of the new feature.</p></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><p>We find that most of the developers sampled own at least a badge, but we also observe an increasing number of users who choose to keep their profile private and opt out of displaying badges. Additionally, badges are generally poorly correlated with developers’ skills and dispositions such as timeliness and desire to collaborate. We also find that, except for the <span>Starstruck</span> badge (reflecting the number of followers), their introduction does not have an effect. Finally, the reaction of the community has been in general mixed, as developers find them appealing in principle but without a clear purpose and hardly reflecting their abilities in the current form.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions:</h3><p>We provide recommendations to the designers of the <span>GitHub</span>platform on how to improve the current implementation of personal badges as both a gamification mechanism and as sources of reliable cues for assessing the abilities of developers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information and Software Technology\",\"volume\":\"176 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107561\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924001666/pdfft?md5=7dc16813d20c4c9c7f058e8d063fcd37&pid=1-s2.0-S0950584924001666-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information and Software Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924001666\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Software Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924001666","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:GitHub 通过个人成就引入了新的游戏化元素,开发者的个人档案页面上会解锁并显示徽章,以表彰他们的开发活动。方法:首先,我们通过挖掘 6000 多名开发者的纵向数据进行观察研究,并进行相关性和回归分析。结果:我们发现大多数抽样调查的开发者至少拥有一个徽章,但我们也观察到越来越多的用户选择保持个人资料私密,不显示徽章。此外,徽章与开发人员的技能和性格(如及时性和合作意愿)的相关性普遍较低。我们还发现,除了 "追星族 "徽章(反映关注者数量)外,其他徽章的引入并没有产生影响。结论:我们向 GitHub 平台的设计者提出了建议,如何改善目前个人徽章作为游戏化机制和评估开发者能力的可靠线索的实施情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A lot of talk and a badge: An exploratory analysis of personal achievements in GitHub

Context:

GitHub has introduced a new gamification element through personal achievements, whereby badges are unlocked and displayed on developers’ personal profile pages in recognition of their development activities.

Objective:

In this paper, we present an exploratory analysis using mixed methods to study the diffusion of personal badges in GitHub, in addition to the effects and reactions to their introduction.

Method:

First, we conduct an observational study by mining longitudinal data from more than 6,000 developers and performed correlation and regression analysis. Then, we conduct a survey and analyze over 300 GitHub community discussions on the topic of personal badges to gauge how the community responded to the introduction of the new feature.

Results:

We find that most of the developers sampled own at least a badge, but we also observe an increasing number of users who choose to keep their profile private and opt out of displaying badges. Additionally, badges are generally poorly correlated with developers’ skills and dispositions such as timeliness and desire to collaborate. We also find that, except for the Starstruck badge (reflecting the number of followers), their introduction does not have an effect. Finally, the reaction of the community has been in general mixed, as developers find them appealing in principle but without a clear purpose and hardly reflecting their abilities in the current form.

Conclusions:

We provide recommendations to the designers of the GitHubplatform on how to improve the current implementation of personal badges as both a gamification mechanism and as sources of reliable cues for assessing the abilities of developers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information and Software Technology
Information and Software Technology 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
9.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Information and Software Technology is the international archival journal focusing on research and experience that contributes to the improvement of software development practices. The journal''s scope includes methods and techniques to better engineer software and manage its development. Articles submitted for review should have a clear component of software engineering or address ways to improve the engineering and management of software development. Areas covered by the journal include: • Software management, quality and metrics, • Software processes, • Software architecture, modelling, specification, design and programming • Functional and non-functional software requirements • Software testing and verification & validation • Empirical studies of all aspects of engineering and managing software development Short Communications is a new section dedicated to short papers addressing new ideas, controversial opinions, "Negative" results and much more. Read the Guide for authors for more information. The journal encourages and welcomes submissions of systematic literature studies (reviews and maps) within the scope of the journal. Information and Software Technology is the premiere outlet for systematic literature studies in software engineering.
期刊最新文献
A software product line approach for developing hybrid software systems Evaluating the understandability and user acceptance of Attack-Defense Trees: Original experiment and replication On the road to interactive LLM-based systematic mapping studies Top-down: A better strategy for incremental covering array generation Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1