对当前和未来急诊医学人才队伍的看法

Adriana Segura Olson MD, MAEd, Simiao Li-Sauerwine MD, MSCR, Aaron S. Kraut MD, William Burns MD, Kelly Williamson MD, Jeremy Branzetti MD, MHPE, Nicholas D. Hartman MD, MPH, Jonathan J. Oskvarek MD, MBA, Amer Aldeen MD, the Emergency Medicine Education Research Alliance (EMERA)
{"title":"对当前和未来急诊医学人才队伍的看法","authors":"Adriana Segura Olson MD, MAEd,&nbsp;Simiao Li-Sauerwine MD, MSCR,&nbsp;Aaron S. Kraut MD,&nbsp;William Burns MD,&nbsp;Kelly Williamson MD,&nbsp;Jeremy Branzetti MD, MHPE,&nbsp;Nicholas D. Hartman MD, MPH,&nbsp;Jonathan J. Oskvarek MD, MBA,&nbsp;Amer Aldeen MD,&nbsp;the Emergency Medicine Education Research Alliance (EMERA)","doi":"10.1002/emp2.13279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The objectives of the study were to assess emergency medicine (EM) physician perceptions of the EM job market 2 years after “The Emergency Medicine Physician Workforce: Projections for 2030” was published in <i>Annals of Emergency Medicine</i> and to examine how the workforce report may have influenced perceptions about job prospects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2022 of EM residents, fellows, and attendings at 21 practice sites. Main outcomes were perceptions of the likelihood of currently finding any job, currently finding a desirable job, and confidence in the future EM job market.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Note that 831 of 1938 physicians (42.9%) responded. A total of 92.4% reported a high likelihood of finding any job currently, 49.8% reported a high likelihood of finding a desirable job currently, and 44.4% reported future confidence. Workforce report familiarity was associated with greater likelihood of finding a desirable job. Fellows were least confident in the future. Residents with desired Midwest location were twice as confident in the future job market; those with desired West location were less confident. Attendings 20 or more years post-training were more than twice as likely to report a high likelihood of finding a desirable job and almost twice as likely to report future confidence. Attendings in leadership were nearly three times as likely to report high a likelihood of finding a desirable job and future confidence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>EM trainees and attendings have favorable perceptions of the current job market but are less confident in future prospects. As the projected surplus of EM physicians appears to have had an impact, updated projections are needed for more accurate assessments of the future of the specialty.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/emp2.13279","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of the current and future emergency medicine workforce\",\"authors\":\"Adriana Segura Olson MD, MAEd,&nbsp;Simiao Li-Sauerwine MD, MSCR,&nbsp;Aaron S. Kraut MD,&nbsp;William Burns MD,&nbsp;Kelly Williamson MD,&nbsp;Jeremy Branzetti MD, MHPE,&nbsp;Nicholas D. Hartman MD, MPH,&nbsp;Jonathan J. Oskvarek MD, MBA,&nbsp;Amer Aldeen MD,&nbsp;the Emergency Medicine Education Research Alliance (EMERA)\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/emp2.13279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>The objectives of the study were to assess emergency medicine (EM) physician perceptions of the EM job market 2 years after “The Emergency Medicine Physician Workforce: Projections for 2030” was published in <i>Annals of Emergency Medicine</i> and to examine how the workforce report may have influenced perceptions about job prospects.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2022 of EM residents, fellows, and attendings at 21 practice sites. Main outcomes were perceptions of the likelihood of currently finding any job, currently finding a desirable job, and confidence in the future EM job market.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Note that 831 of 1938 physicians (42.9%) responded. A total of 92.4% reported a high likelihood of finding any job currently, 49.8% reported a high likelihood of finding a desirable job currently, and 44.4% reported future confidence. Workforce report familiarity was associated with greater likelihood of finding a desirable job. Fellows were least confident in the future. Residents with desired Midwest location were twice as confident in the future job market; those with desired West location were less confident. Attendings 20 or more years post-training were more than twice as likely to report a high likelihood of finding a desirable job and almost twice as likely to report future confidence. Attendings in leadership were nearly three times as likely to report high a likelihood of finding a desirable job and future confidence.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>EM trainees and attendings have favorable perceptions of the current job market but are less confident in future prospects. As the projected surplus of EM physicians appears to have had an impact, updated projections are needed for more accurate assessments of the future of the specialty.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/emp2.13279\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/emp2.13279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/emp2.13279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的 本研究旨在评估《急诊医学医师队伍》在《急诊医学年鉴》上发表两年后急诊医学医师对急诊医学就业市场的看法:2030 年的预测》在《急诊医学年鉴》(Annals of Emergency Medicine)上发表两年后,对急诊医学医师对就业市场的看法进行评估,并研究劳动力报告可能对就业前景的看法产生了哪些影响。 方法 在 2022 年对 21 个实习基地的急诊科住院医师、研究员和主治医师进行了横断面调查。主要结果是对目前找到任何工作的可能性、目前找到理想工作的可能性以及对未来急诊医学就业市场的信心的看法。 结果显示,1938 名医生中有 831 人(42.9%)做出了回应。共有 92.4% 的人表示目前找到任何工作的可能性很高,49.8% 的人表示目前找到理想工作的可能性很高,44.4% 的人表示对未来充满信心。劳动力报告的熟悉程度与找到理想工作的可能性有关。研究员对未来最没有信心。希望在中西部地区工作的住院医师对未来就业市场的信心是希望在西部地区工作的住院医师的两倍;而希望在西部地区工作的住院医师则信心不足。培训后 20 年或 20 年以上的主治医师表示找到理想工作的可能性很高,表示对未来有信心的可能性几乎是前者的两倍。担任领导职务的主治医师表示找到理想工作的可能性高和对未来有信心的可能性几乎是其他人员的三倍。 结论 急诊科实习生和主治医师对目前的就业市场有良好的看法,但对未来的前景信心不足。由于预计的急诊科医生过剩似乎已经产生了影响,因此需要更新预测,以便更准确地评估该专业的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perceptions of the current and future emergency medicine workforce

Objective

The objectives of the study were to assess emergency medicine (EM) physician perceptions of the EM job market 2 years after “The Emergency Medicine Physician Workforce: Projections for 2030” was published in Annals of Emergency Medicine and to examine how the workforce report may have influenced perceptions about job prospects.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2022 of EM residents, fellows, and attendings at 21 practice sites. Main outcomes were perceptions of the likelihood of currently finding any job, currently finding a desirable job, and confidence in the future EM job market.

Results

Note that 831 of 1938 physicians (42.9%) responded. A total of 92.4% reported a high likelihood of finding any job currently, 49.8% reported a high likelihood of finding a desirable job currently, and 44.4% reported future confidence. Workforce report familiarity was associated with greater likelihood of finding a desirable job. Fellows were least confident in the future. Residents with desired Midwest location were twice as confident in the future job market; those with desired West location were less confident. Attendings 20 or more years post-training were more than twice as likely to report a high likelihood of finding a desirable job and almost twice as likely to report future confidence. Attendings in leadership were nearly three times as likely to report high a likelihood of finding a desirable job and future confidence.

Conclusion

EM trainees and attendings have favorable perceptions of the current job market but are less confident in future prospects. As the projected surplus of EM physicians appears to have had an impact, updated projections are needed for more accurate assessments of the future of the specialty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Passage of vaginal tissue in an non-pregnant adolescent A woman with sudden unilateral vision loss Factors influencing emergency medicine worker shift satisfaction: A rapid assessment of wellness in the emergency department The Dunning‒Kruger effect in resident predicted and actual performance on the American Board of Emergency Medicine in-training examination A multicenter randomized control trial: Point-of-care syndromic assessment versus standard testing in urgent care center patients with acute respiratory illness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1